Literature DB >> 17955333

Feasibility of recruiting a birth cohort through the Internet: the experience of the NINFEA cohort.

Lorenzo Richiardi1, Iacopo Baussano, Loredana Vizzini, Jeroen Douwes, Neil Pearce, Franco Merletti.   

Abstract

The NINFEA cohort is an Italian birth cohort aiming at recruiting pregnant women through the Internet and following-up their children. To understand whether Internet-based recruitment was feasible we started a pilot in July 2005 targeted to pregnant women visiting the hospitals of the city of Turin (900,000 inhabitants), where we advertised the study. For this purpose we constructed a website (www.progettoninfea.it), with on-line questionnaires to be completed during pregnancy and at 6 and 18 months after delivery. Participants' characteristics were compared with those of women giving birth in Turin, which are routinely released as individual anonymous records. We also compared complete with partial respondents. We also carried out a survey of 122 women giving birth in the main Turin obstetric hospital to estimate the proportion of pregnant women with access to the Internet and awareness of the NINFEA cohort. By December 2006, we had recruited 670 women. Participation was associated with being older, a university graduate, primiparous and born in Italy. Complete response (n = 633) was associated with being primiparous and participation after the first trimester. In the survey, 66% (95% confidence interval: 56-74%; n = 80) of the women had access to the Internet and 42% (33-51%; n = 51) were aware of the study; 6.5% (2.9-12.5%; n = 8) had participated in the NINFEA cohort. Our study indicates that recruitment of an Internet-based birth cohort is feasible. As with many other types of birth cohort study, the participants are a self-selected sample. To minimise selection bias analyses should therefore be limited to internal comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17955333     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-007-9194-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  23 in total

1.  Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Simon De Lusignan; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Administering an effective health intervention for smoking cessation online: the international users of Stop-Tabac.

Authors:  Jen Wang; Jean-François Etter
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?

Authors:  Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Morten Frydenberg; Tine Brink Henriksen; Jorn Olsen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Biases in internet sexual health samples: comparison of an internet sexuality survey and a national sexual health survey in Sweden.

Authors:  Michael W Ross; Sven-Axel Månsson; Kristian Daneback; Al Cooper; Ronny Tikkanen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Web-based and mailed questionnaires: a comparison of response rates and compliance.

Authors:  Katarina Augustsson Bälter; Olle Bälter; Elinor Fondell; Ylva Trolle Lagerros
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Internet-based data inclusion in a population-based European collaborative follow-up study of inflammatory bowel disease patients: description of methods used and analysis of factors influencing response rates.

Authors:  Frank L Wolters; Gilbert van Zeijl; Jildou Sijbrandij; Frederik Wessels; Colm O'Morain; Charles Limonard; Maurice G Russel; Reinhold W Stockbrugger
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Obtaining sensitive data through the Web: an example of design and methods.

Authors:  Atar Baer; Stefan Saroiu; Laura A Koutsky
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Optimizing the design of web-based questionnaires--experience from a population-based study among 50,000 women.

Authors:  Alexandra Ekman; Asa Klint; Paul W Dickman; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Eric Litton
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 12.434

9.  Internet-based monitoring of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the general population of the Netherlands during the 2003-2004 influenza season.

Authors:  Richard L Marquet; Aad I M Bartelds; Sander P van Noort; Carl E Koppeschaar; John Paget; François G Schellevis; Jouke van der Zee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison.

Authors:  Philip Ritter; Kate Lorig; Diana Laurent; Katy Matthews
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  42 in total

1.  Recent trends in publications in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

Authors:  Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Fetal nutritional origins of adult diseases: challenges for epidemiological research.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Evaluation of Selection Bias in an Internet-based Study of Pregnancy Planners.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hatch; Kristen A Hahn; Lauren A Wise; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Ramya Kumar; Matthew P Fox; Daniel R Brooks; Anders H Riis; Henrik Toft Sorensen; Kenneth J Rothman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Comparison of web versus interview participants in a case-control study.

Authors:  Mahsa M Yazdy; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Maternal anxiety, depression and sleep disorders before and during pregnancy, and preschool ADHD symptoms in the NINFEA birth cohort study.

Authors:  L Vizzini; M Popovic; D Zugna; B Vitiello; M Trevisan; C Pizzi; F Rusconi; L Gagliardi; F Merletti; L Richiardi
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 6.892

7.  POMME: The New Cohort to Evaluate Long-Term Effects After Prenatal Medicine Exposure.

Authors:  Justine Benevent; Caroline Hurault-Delarue; Mélanie Araujo; Jean-Louis Montastruc; Isabelle Lacroix; Christine Damase-Michel
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Design and Conduct of an Internet-Based Preconception Cohort Study in North America: Pregnancy Study Online.

Authors:  Lauren A Wise; Kenneth J Rothman; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Joseph B Stanford; Amelia K Wesselink; Craig McKinnon; Siobhan M Gruschow; Casie E Horgan; Aleta S Wiley; Kristen A Hahn; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Elizabeth E Hatch
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Recruitment of healthy first-trimester pregnant women: lessons from the Chemicals, Health & Pregnancy study (CHirP).

Authors:  Glenys M Webster; Kay Teschke; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

10.  [Pilot testing of an internet based pregnancy planning study "Snart-gravid.dk"].

Authors:  Ellen M Mikkelsen; Helle Terkildsen Maindal
Journal:  Klin Sygepleje       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.