Laura L Blaisdell1, Jennifer A Zellner2, Alison A King3, Elaine Faustman4, Mari Wilhelm5, Mark L Hudak6, Robert D Annett7. 1. Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine; 2. University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; 3. Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri; 4. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; 5. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; 6. University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida; and. 7. Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi rannett@umc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ten National Children's Study (NCS) study locations with diverse demographic characteristics used an enhanced household-based recruitment (EHBR) approach to enroll preconceptional and pregnant women. Study centers used different types and dosages of community outreach and engagement (COE) activities and supplemental strategies. The goal of the study was to determine whether variability in enumeration and recruitment outcomes correlated with study location characteristics or types and dosages of COE activities (number of COE events, number of advance household mailings, total media expenditures, and total COE expenditures). METHODS: Each of the sites provided data on COE activities, protocol implementation, supplemental recruitment activities, location demographic characteristics, and enumeration/recruitment outcomes. RESULTS: COE activities varied across sites in breadth and scope. Numerous strategies were used, including media advertising, social media, participation in community-wide events, presentations to stakeholders, and creation of advisory boards. Some sites included supplemental recruitment efforts. EHBR sites enrolled 1404 women at the initial pregnancy screening. No significant relationships were found between study location demographic characteristics or between the types and dosages of COE activities and recruitment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Probability sampling for a long-term study requires a positive image with stakeholders and within communities; this requirement may be especially true for door-to-door recruitment. EHBR sites successfully recruited a representative sample of preconceptional and pregnant women. Sites reported implementing similar COE activities but with varying dosage and cost; however, analyses did not support a benefit of COE strategies on study recruitment.
OBJECTIVES: Ten National Children's Study (NCS) study locations with diverse demographic characteristics used an enhanced household-based recruitment (EHBR) approach to enroll preconceptional and pregnant women. Study centers used different types and dosages of community outreach and engagement (COE) activities and supplemental strategies. The goal of the study was to determine whether variability in enumeration and recruitment outcomes correlated with study location characteristics or types and dosages of COE activities (number of COE events, number of advance household mailings, total media expenditures, and total COE expenditures). METHODS: Each of the sites provided data on COE activities, protocol implementation, supplemental recruitment activities, location demographic characteristics, and enumeration/recruitment outcomes. RESULTS: COE activities varied across sites in breadth and scope. Numerous strategies were used, including media advertising, social media, participation in community-wide events, presentations to stakeholders, and creation of advisory boards. Some sites included supplemental recruitment efforts. EHBR sites enrolled 1404 women at the initial pregnancy screening. No significant relationships were found between study location demographic characteristics or between the types and dosages of COE activities and recruitment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Probability sampling for a long-term study requires a positive image with stakeholders and within communities; this requirement may be especially true for door-to-door recruitment. EHBR sites successfully recruited a representative sample of preconceptional and pregnant women. Sites reported implementing similar COE activities but with varying dosage and cost; however, analyses did not support a benefit of COE strategies on study recruitment.
Authors: J E Brown; D R Jacobs; G M Barosso; J D Potter; P J Hannan; R A Kopher; M J Rourke; T J Hartman; K Hase Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Daniel E Hale; Sharon B Wyatt; Stephen Buka; Debra Cherry; Kendall K Cislo; Donald J Dudley; Pearl Anna McElfish; Gwendolyn S Norman; Simone A Reynolds; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Sandra Wadlinger; Cheryl K Walker; James M Robbins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Patricia M McGovern; Nancy M Nachreiner; Jane L Holl; Neal Halfon; Dana Dabelea; Laura Caulfield; Jane A Cauley; Mark S Innocenti; Laura Amsden; Nina Markovic; Minsun Riddles; Sara Adams Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Brenda Eskenazi; Eleanor A Gladstone; Gertrud S Berkowitz; Christina H Drew; Elaine M Faustman; Nina T Holland; Bruce Lanphear; Stefanie J Meisel; Frederica P Perera; Virginia A Rauh; Anne Sweeney; Robin M Whyatt; Kimberly Yolton Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-07-08
Authors: Germaine M Buck; Courtney D Lynch; Joseph B Stanford; Anne M Sweeney; Laura A Schieve; John C Rockett; Sherry G Selevan; Steven M Schrader Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Beth B Tigges; Jill L Kaar; Nancy Erbstein; Pamela Silberman; Kate Winseck; Maria Lopez-Class; Thomas M Burbacher Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2017-07-19
Authors: Peter K Gilbertson; Susan Forrester; Linda Andrews; Kathleen McCann; Lydia Rogers; Christina Park; Jack Moye Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-03-05
Authors: Suzanne C Hughes; Carol J Hogue; Melissa A Clark; Jessica E Graber; Elaine D Eaker; Amy H Herring Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2019-03