Literature DB >> 27586760

Role of contextual cues on the perception of spectrally reduced interrupted speech.

Chhayakanta Patro1, Lisa Lucks Mendel1.   

Abstract

Understanding speech within an auditory scene is constantly challenged by interfering noise in suboptimal listening environments when noise hinders the continuity of the speech stream. In such instances, a typical auditory-cognitive system perceptually integrates available speech information and "fills in" missing information in the light of semantic context. However, individuals with cochlear implants (CIs) find it difficult and effortful to understand interrupted speech compared to their normal hearing counterparts. This inefficiency in perceptual integration of speech could be attributed to further degradations in the spectral-temporal domain imposed by CIs making it difficult to utilize the contextual evidence effectively. To address these issues, 20 normal hearing adults listened to speech that was spectrally reduced and spectrally reduced interrupted in a manner similar to CI processing. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise test, which includes contextually rich and contextually poor sentences, was used to evaluate the influence of semantic context on speech perception. Results indicated that listeners benefited more from semantic context when they listened to spectrally reduced speech alone. For the spectrally reduced interrupted speech, contextual information was not as helpful under significant spectral reductions, but became beneficial as the spectral resolution improved. These results suggest top-down processing facilitates speech perception up to a point, and it fails to facilitate speech understanding when the speech signals are significantly degraded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586760     DOI: 10.1121/1.4961450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Steven P Gianakas; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Access to semantic cues does not lead to perceptual restoration of interrupted speech in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Sarah Weinstein; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ashley N Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.