Literature DB >> 25239296

Older and younger adult cochlear implant users: speech recognition in quiet and noise, quality of life, and music perception.

Douglas P Sladen, Amanda Zappler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether older cochlear implant (CI) listeners differ from younger CI listeners on measures of speech understanding, music perception, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In the study, the authors hypothesized that speech recognition would be more difficult for older adults, especially in noisy conditions. Performance on music perception was expected to be lower for older implanted listeners. No differences between age groups were expected on HRQoL.
METHOD: Twenty older (>60 years) and 20 younger (<60 years) implanted adults participated. Speech understanding was assessed using words and sentences presented in quiet, and sentences presented at +15, +10, and +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio conditions. Music perception was tested using the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music, and HRQoL was measured using the Njimegen CI survey.
RESULTS: Speech understanding was significantly lower for the older compared with the younger group in all conditions. Older implanted adults showed lower performance on music perception compared with younger implanted adults on 1 of 3 subtests. Older adults reported lower HRQoL benefit than younger adults on 3 of 6 subdomains.
CONCLUSION: Data indicate that older CI listeners performed more poorly than younger CI listeners, although group differences appear to be task specific.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25239296     DOI: 10.1044/2014_AJA-13-0066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  28 in total

1.  Effect of Stimulation Rate on Speech Understanding in Older Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Nicole Nguyen; Miranda Cleary; Ronna Hertzano; David J Eisenman; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Age-Related Compensation Mechanism Revealed in the Cortical Representation of Degraded Speech.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsey Roque; Casey R Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-08

3.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Age effects on perceptual restoration of degraded interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Bruna S S Mussoi; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Evaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  Douglas P Sladen; René H Gifford; David Haynes; David Kelsall; Aaron Benson; Kristen Lewis; Teresa Zwolan; Qian-Jie Fu; Bruce Gantz; Jan Gilden; Brian Westerberg; Cindy Gustin; Lori O'Neil; Colin L Driscoll
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Erin P Walter; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Audiology Practices in the Preoperative Evaluation and Management of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates.

Authors:  Sandra Prentiss; Hillary Snapp; Teresa Zwolan
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Clinical Application of Spectral Modulation Detection: Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Authors:  David M Kessler; Jace Wolfe; Michelle Blanchard; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  Aging and Hearing Health: The Life-course Approach.

Authors:  Adrian Davis; Catherine M McMahon; Kathleen M Pichora-Fuller; Shirley Russ; Frank Lin; Bolajoko O Olusanya; Shelly Chadha; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.