Literature DB >> 33765178

What factors influence the switch from unitary to divided attention?

Lisa N Jefferies1,2, Mathea Ambrose3, Vincent Di Lollo4.   

Abstract

The focus of attention can be either unitary or divided and can transition from unitary to divided while performing a task. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether alerting hastens the transition from unitary to divided attention. To this end, we employed a dual-RSVP-stream Attentional Blink task (AB; impaired perception of the second of two rapidly sequential targets) with two pairs of letter targets (T1-pair and T2-pair). One component of the AB known as Lag-1 sparing (unimpaired perception of the T2-pair when it is presented directly after the T1-pair) occurs only when the T2-pair falls in an attended location. When the T2-pair falls in an unattended location, the converse pattern occurs (Lag-1 deficit). Accordingly, we used the incidence of Lag-1 sparing/deficit to index whether a location was attended or unattended. We found that presenting a brief brightening flash of the screen (alerting) just before the T1-pair hastened the transition from the initial unitary focus to a divided focus. In Experiment 2, we pitted the hastening account against an alternative hypothesis that the flash triggers phasic activation of the Locus Coeruleus-norepinephrine neuromodulatory system, thus resetting the underlying neural networks that mediate the distribution of attention, triggering a switch from unitary to divided attention. The results of Experiment 2 were incompatible with the hastening account, but consistent with the network-reset account.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33765178     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01500-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  6 in total

1.  Evidence for split attentional foci.

Authors:  E Awh; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? .

Authors:  J E Raymond; K L Shapiro; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Masking T1 difficulty: processing time and the attenional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The flexible focus: whether spatial attention is unitary or divided depends on observer goals.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; James T Enns; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Linear changes in the spatial extent of the focus of attention across time.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Allocation of attention in the visual field.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; Y Y Yeh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.