Literature DB >> 17469969

Masking T1 difficulty: processing time and the attenional blink.

Troy A W Visser1.   

Abstract

When observers are presented with 2 targets in rapid succession, identification of the 1st is highly accurate, whereas identification of the 2nd is impaired at brief intertarget intervals (i.e., 200-500 ms). This 2nd-target deficit is known as the attentional blink (AB). According to bottleneck models, the AB arises because attending to the 1st target delays allocation of attention to the 2nd target. Thus, these models predict that increasing 1st-target processing time will increase the magnitude of the AB. Previous tests of this prediction have yielded mixed results. The present work suggests that one factor contributing to this uncertainty is masking of the 1st target: When this mask is omitted, processing time and AB magnitude are reliably related. These findings clarify the role of 1st-target masking in the AB and support the validity of the bottleneck account.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17469969     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  Neither backward masking of T2 nor task switching is necessary for the attentional blink.

Authors:  Ali Jannati; Thomas M Spalek; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

2.  Task set flexibility and feature specificity modulate the limits of temporal attention.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Charlotte Köhne; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-08

3.  Contextual control over selective attention: evidence from a two-target method.

Authors:  Ellen MacLellan; David I Shore; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-17

Review 4.  The attentional blink: past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Unmasking the attentional blink.

Authors:  Mark R Nieuwenstein; Mary C Potter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Neural competition for conscious representation across time: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Tom Johnstone; Iseult A M Beets; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Memory search for the first target modulates the magnitude of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Ashley Sherman; Sage E P Boettcher; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

9.  The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: sparing at a cost.

Authors:  Brad Wyble; Howard Bowman; Mark Nieuwenstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  What factors influence the switch from unitary to divided attention?

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Mathea Ambrose; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.