Literature DB >> 24188402

The flexible focus: whether spatial attention is unitary or divided depends on observer goals.

Lisa N Jefferies1, James T Enns2, Vincent Di Lollo3.   

Abstract

The distribution of visual attention has been the topic of much investigation, and various theories have posited that attention is allocated either as a single unitary focus or as multiple independent foci. In the present experiment, we demonstrate that attention can be flexibly deployed as either a unitary or a divided focus in the same experimental task, depending on the observer's goals. To assess the distribution of attention, we used a dual-stream Attentional Blink (AB) paradigm and 2 target pairs. One component of the AB, Lag-1 sparing, occurs only if the second target pair appears within the focus of attention. By varying whether the first-target-pair could be expected in a predictable location (always in-stream) or not (unpredictably in-stream or between-streams), observers were encouraged to deploy a divided or a unitary focus, respectively. When the second-target-pair appeared between the streams, Lag-1 sparing occurred for the Unpredictable group (consistent with a unitary focus) but not for the Predictable group (consistent with a divided focus). Thus, diametrically different outcomes occurred for physically identical displays, depending on the expectations of the observer about where spatial attention would be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24188402     DOI: 10.1037/a0034734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Alexa B Roggeveen; James T Enns; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-15

2.  Working memory capacity accounts for the ability to switch between object-based and location-based allocation of visual attention.

Authors:  M Kathryn Bleckley; Jeffrey L Foster; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

3.  Can training change attentional breadth? Failure to find transfer effects.

Authors:  Lin Fang; Kristof Hoorelbeke; Lynn Bruyneel; Lies Notebaert; Colin MacLeod; Rudi De Raedt; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-26

4.  Spatial distribution of emotional attentional blink under top-down attentional control.

Authors:  Divita Singh; Meera Mary Sunny
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-09-26

5.  Flexible attention system: Appearance time of split attention changes in accordance with the task difficulty level.

Authors:  Guangyao Zu; Hanbin Sang; Heng Zhou; Fan Zhang; Xiaogang Wu; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  What factors influence the switch from unitary to divided attention?

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Mathea Ambrose; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-25

7.  Pupillary dilation elicited by attending to two disks with different luminance.

Authors:  Xiaofei Hu; Rumi Hisakata; Hirohiko Kaneko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Studying Spatial Visual Attention: The Attention-Window Task as a Measurement Tool for the Shape and Maximum Spread of the Attention Window.

Authors:  Stefanie Klatt; Daniel Memmert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-25

9.  The whole is faster than its parts: evidence for temporally independent attention to distinct spatial locations.

Authors:  Andrew Clement; Nestor Matthews
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.