Literature DB >> 32126404

Mixed organic and inorganic tapwater exposures and potential effects in greater Chicago area, USA.

Paul M Bradley1, Maria Argos2, Dana W Kolpin3, Shannon M Meppelink3, Kristin M Romanok4, Kelly L Smalling4, Michael J Focazio5, Joshua M Allen6, Julie E Dietze7, Michael J Devito8, Ariel R Donovan7, Nicola Evans9, Carrie E Givens10, James L Gray11, Christopher P Higgins12, Michelle L Hladik13, Luke R Iwanowicz14, Celeste A Journey15, Rachael F Lane7, Zachary R Laughrey7, Keith A Loftin7, R Blaine McCleskey16, Carrie A McDonough12, Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley9, Michael T Meyer7, Andrea R Putz17, Susan D Richardson6, Alan E Stark17, Christopher P Weis18, Vickie S Wilson9, Abderrahman Zehraoui19.   

Abstract

Safe drinking water at the point of use (tapwater, TW) is a public-health priority. TW exposures and potential human-health concerns of 540 organics and 35 inorganics were assessed in 45 Chicago-area United States (US) homes in 2017. No US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level(s) (MCL) were exceeded in any residential or water treatment plant (WTP) pre-distribution TW sample. Ninety percent (90%) of organic analytes were not detected in treated TW, emphasizing the high quality of the Lake Michigan drinking-water source and the efficacy of the drinking-water treatment and monitoring. Sixteen (16) organics were detected in >25% of TW samples, with about 50 detected at least once. Low-level TW exposures to unregulated disinfection byproducts (DBP) of emerging concern, per/polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and three pesticides were ubiquitous. Common exceedances of non-enforceable EPA MCL Goal(s) (MCLG) of zero for arsenic [As], lead [Pb], uranium [U], bromodichloromethane, and tribromomethane suggest potential human-health concerns and emphasize the continuing need for improved understanding of cumulative effects of low-concentration mixtures on vulnerable sub-populations. Because DBP dominated TW organics, residential-TW concentrations are potentially predictable with expanded pre-distribution DBP monitoring. However, several TW chemicals, notably Pb and several infrequently detected organic compounds, were not readily explained by pre-distribution samples, illustrating the need for continued broad inorganic/organic TW characterization to support consumer assessment of acceptable risk and point-of-use treatment options. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chicago USA; Contaminant mixtures; DBP; Disinfection byproducts; Exposure; Human health; Inorganics; Organics; Point-of-use drinking water; Tapwater; Urban

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32126404      PMCID: PMC9140060          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   10.753


  132 in total

1.  The lead industry and lead water pipes "A Modest Campaign".

Authors:  Richard Rabin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Acute Health Effects After the Elk River Chemical Spill, West Virginia, January 2014.

Authors:  Erica D Thomasson; Elizabeth Scharman; Ethan Fechter-Leggett; Danae Bixler; Sheri'f Ibrahim; Mary Anne Duncan; Joy Hsu; Melissa Scott; Suzanne Wilson; Loretta Haddy; Anthony Pizon; Sherry L Burrer; Amy Wolkin; Lauren Lewis
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Profile sampling to characterize particulate lead risks in potable water.

Authors:  Brandi Clark; Sheldon Masters; Marc Edwards
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  ToxCast Chemical Landscape: Paving the Road to 21st Century Toxicology.

Authors:  Ann M Richard; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Christopher M Grulke; Patra Volarath; Inthirany Thillainadarajah; Chihae Yang; James Rathman; Matthew T Martin; John F Wambaugh; Thomas B Knudsen; Jayaram Kancherla; Kamel Mansouri; Grace Patlewicz; Antony J Williams; Stephen B Little; Kevin M Crofton; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  What's wrong with the tap? Examining perceptions of tap water and bottled water at Purdue University.

Authors:  Amber Saylor; Linda Stalker Prokopy; Shannon Amberg
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Toxicological risk assessment and prioritization of drinking water relevant contaminants of emerging concern.

Authors:  Kirsten A Baken; Rosa M A Sjerps; Merijn Schriks; Annemarie P van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 7.  Health effects of arsenic and chromium in drinking water: recent human findings.

Authors:  Allan H Smith; Craig M Steinmaus
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Bone as a possible target of chemical toxicity of natural uranium in drinking water.

Authors:  Päivi Kurttio; Hannu Komulainen; Aila Leino; Laina Salonen; Anssi Auvinen; Heikki Saha
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Mixed organic and inorganic tapwater exposures and potential effects in greater Chicago area, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Maria Argos; Dana W Kolpin; Shannon M Meppelink; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Joshua M Allen; Julie E Dietze; Michael J Devito; Ariel R Donovan; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Celeste A Journey; Rachael F Lane; Zachary R Laughrey; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley; Michael T Meyer; Andrea R Putz; Susan D Richardson; Alan E Stark; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson; Abderrahman Zehraoui
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 10.  Arsenic in drinking water and urinary tract cancers: a systematic review of 30 years of epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Nathalie Saint-Jacques; Louise Parker; Patrick Brown; Trevor Jb Dummer
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Mixed Contaminants: Occurrence, Interactions, Toxicity, Detection, and Remediation.

Authors:  Anirban Goutam Mukherjee; Uddesh Ramesh Wanjari; Mohamed Ahmed Eladl; Mohamed El-Sherbiny; Dalia Mahmoud Abdelmonem Elsherbini; Aarthi Sukumar; Sandra Kannampuzha; Madurika Ravichandran; Kaviyarasi Renu; Balachandar Vellingiri; Sabariswaran Kandasamy; Abilash Valsala Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  In vitro effects-based method and water quality screening model for use in pre- and post-distribution treated waters.

Authors:  Elizabeth Medlock Kakaley; Mary C Cardon; Nicola Evans; Luke R Iwanowicz; Joshua M Allen; Elizabeth Wagner; Katherine Bokenkamp; Susan D Richardson; Michael J Plewa; Paul M Bradley; Kristin M Romanok; Dana W Kolpin; Justin M Conley; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Public and private tapwater: Comparative analysis of contaminant exposure and potential risk, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Denis R LeBlanc; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Mary C Cardon; Jimmy M Clark; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth K Medlock-Kakaley; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 13.352

Review 4.  Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Breast Cancer: Disparities in Exposure and Importance of Research Inclusivity.

Authors:  Ashlie Santaliz Casiano; Annah Lee; Dede Teteh; Zeynep Madak Erdogan; Lindsey Treviño
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.051

5.  Mixed organic and inorganic tapwater exposures and potential effects in greater Chicago area, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Maria Argos; Dana W Kolpin; Shannon M Meppelink; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Joshua M Allen; Julie E Dietze; Michael J Devito; Ariel R Donovan; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Celeste A Journey; Rachael F Lane; Zachary R Laughrey; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley; Michael T Meyer; Andrea R Putz; Susan D Richardson; Alan E Stark; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson; Abderrahman Zehraoui
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 10.753

6.  Integrating Multiscale Geospatial Environmental Data into Large Population Health Studies: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Yuxia Cui; Kristin M Eccles; Richard K Kwok; Bonnie R Joubert; Kyle P Messier; David M Balshaw
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-07-20

7.  Prioritizing Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Great Lakes Tributaries Using Risk-Based Screening Techniques.

Authors:  Matthew A Pronschinske; Steven R Corsi; Laura A DeCicco; Edward T Furlong; Gerald T Ankley; Brett R Blackwell; Daniel L Villeneuve; Peter L Lenaker; Michelle A Nott
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.218

8.  Identifying Chemicals and Mixtures of Potential Biological Concern Detected in Passive Samplers from Great Lakes Tributaries Using High-Throughput Data and Biological Pathways.

Authors:  David A Alvarez; Steven R Corsi; Laura A De Cicco; Daniel L Villeneuve; Austin K Baldwin
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.