Literature DB >> 29875071

Genotoxicity of disinfection byproducts and disinfected waters: A review of recent literature.

Constanza Cortés1, Ricard Marcos2.   

Abstract

The presence of water disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in tap water, resulting from disinfection processes involving chlorination or chloramination, increases the mutagenicity of the water and may pose adverse health effects. The topic was reviewed by DeMarini and coworkers in 2007. Here, we review research on the genotoxicity of DBPs published since that time. Studies, primarily using the Salmonella mutagenicity assay, have continued to show that chlorination or chloramination of source waters results in finished, tap, or swimming pool/spa water that is more mutagenic than the original source water. The genotoxic potencies of DBPs in both bacterial and mammalian cells generally rank as iodinated > brominated > chlorinated. Several DBPs are genotoxic in vivo in plants as well as in animals such as the worm Caenorhabditis elegans and the zebrafish Danio rerio. Studies primarily using the comet assay in mammalian cells have identified several non-regulated DBPs as genotoxic. However, the comet assay detects DNA damage that is generally repaired by the cells; thus, genotoxicity data more relevant to persistent mutations, such as chromosomal or gene mutations, are needed for these DBPs. Recent molecular epidemiology has indicated that activation of brominated trihalomethanes by the enzyme GSTT1 and the lack of metabolism of haloacetic acids by a variant of enzyme GSTZ1 are likely causative mechanisms for bladder cancer associated with exposure to chlorinated water. Further studies, especially in vivo, are needed to determine the ability of various DBPs, especially unregulated ones, to induce both gene as well as chromosomal mutations. Such investigations, along with additional molecular epidemiology studies, are required for a comprehensive understanding of the genotoxic and carcinogenic risks associated with DBP exposure.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlorination byproducts; Comet assay; Genotoxicity; Mutagenicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29875071     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen        ISSN: 1383-5718            Impact factor:   2.873


  11 in total

1.  Degradation of haloacetic acids with the Fenton-like and analysis by GC-MS: use of bioassays for monitoring of genotoxic, mutagenic and cytotoxic effects.

Authors:  Amanda Oliveira Mourão; Diego Francis Silva; Mariandry Rodriguez; Thamyris Souza Torres; Elton Santos Franco; Valter Lúcio Pádua; Márcia Cristina da Silva Faria; Luiz Fernando Oliveira Maia; Jairo Lisboa Rodrigues
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Effects of prenatal and lactational exposure to iodoacetic acid on the F1 generation of mice†.

Authors:  Andressa Gonsioroski; Michael J Plewa; Jodi A Flaws
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.161

3.  Effects of ascorbate and carbonate on the conversion and developmental toxicity of halogenated disinfection byproducts during boiling of tap water.

Authors:  Jiaqi Liu; Yu Li; Jingyi Jiang; Xiangru Zhang; Virender K Sharma; Christie M Sayes
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Addition of lemon before boiling chlorinated tap water: A strategy to control halogenated disinfection byproducts.

Authors:  Jiaqi Liu; Christie M Sayes; Virender K Sharma; Yu Li; Xiangru Zhang
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Inability of GSTT1 to activate iodinated halomethanes to mutagens in Salmonella.

Authors:  David M DeMarini; Sarah H Warren; Weston J Smith; Susan D Richardson; Hannah K Liberatore
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.579

6.  Public and private tapwater: Comparative analysis of contaminant exposure and potential risk, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Denis R LeBlanc; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Mary C Cardon; Jimmy M Clark; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth K Medlock-Kakaley; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 13.352

7.  Comparison of UV-induced AOPs (UV/Cl2, UV/NH2Cl, UV/ClO2 and UV/H2O2 ) in the degradation of iopamidol: Kinetics, energy requirements and DBPs-related toxicity in sequential disinfection processes.

Authors:  Fu-Xiang Tian; Wen-Kai Ye; Bin Xu; Xiao-Jun Hu; Shi-Xu Ma; Fan Lai; Yu-Qiong Gao; Hai-Bo Xing; Wei-Hong Xia; Bo Wang
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 13.273

Review 8.  A review on the 40th anniversary of the first regulation of drinking water disinfection by-products.

Authors:  David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.579

9.  Simultaneous Determination of Chlorinated and Brominated Acetic Acids in Various Environmental Water Matrixes by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Inductively Coupled Plasma Tandem Mass Spectrometry without Sample Preparation.

Authors:  Bassam Lajin; Walter Goessler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Ferrate(VI) pretreatment before disinfection: An effective approach to controlling unsaturated and aromatic halo-disinfection byproducts in chlorinated and chloraminated drinking waters.

Authors:  Jiaqi Liu; Henry Lujan; Birendra Dhungana; William C Hockaday; Christie M Sayes; George P Cobb; Virender K Sharma
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 9.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.