Natalie A Bebbington1,2, Troels Jørgensen3, Erik Dupont4, Mille A Micheelsen3. 1. Siemens Healthcare A/S, Bredskifte Alle 15, 8210, Aarhus V, Denmark. natalie.bebbington@siemens-healthineers.com. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Søndre Skovvej 15, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark. natalie.bebbington@siemens-healthineers.com. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Region Zealand, Roskilde, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Applied tube voltage (kilovolts, kV) and tube current (milliampere seconds, mAs) affect CT radiation dose and image quality and should be optimised for the individual patient. CARE kV determines the kV and mAs providing the lowest dose to the patient, whilst maintaining user-defined reference image quality. Given that kV changes affect CT values which are used to obtain attenuation maps, the aim was to evaluate the effect of kV changes on PET quantification and CT radiation dose using phantoms. METHOD: Four phantoms ('Lungman', 'Lungman plus fat', 'Esser' and 'NEMA image quality' (NEMA IQ)) containing F-18 sources underwent 1 PET and 5 CT scans, with CARE kV on (automatic kV selection and mAs modulation) and in semi mode with specified tube voltages of 140, 120, 100 and 80 kV (mAs modulation only). A CARE kV image quality reference of 120 kV/50 mAs was used. Impact on PET quantification was determined by comparing measured activity concentrations for PET reconstructions from different CT scans with the reconstruction using the 120 kV reference, and dose (DLP, CTDIvol) differences calculated by comparing doses from all kV settings with the 120 kV reference. RESULTS: CARE kV-determined optimal tube voltage and CARE kV 'on' dose (DLP) savings compared with the 120 kV reference were: Lungman, 100 kV, 2.0%; Lungman plus fat, 120 kV, 0%; Esser, 100 kV, 9.3%; NEMA IQ, 100 kV, 3.4%. Using tube voltages in CARE kV 'semi' mode which were not advised by CARE kV 'on' resulted in dose increases ≤ 65% compared with the 120 kV reference (greatest difference Lungman plus fat, 80 kV). Clinically insignificant differences in PET activity quantification of up to 0.7% (Lungman, 100 kV, mean measured activity concentration) were observed when using the optimal tube voltage advised by CARE kV. Differences in PET quantification of up to 4.0% (Lungman, 140 kV, maximum measured activity concentration) were found over the full selection of tube voltages in semi mode, with the greatest differences seen at the most suboptimal kV for each phantom. However, most differences were within 1%. CONCLUSIONS: CARE kV on can provide CT radiation dose savings without concern over changes in PET quantification.
BACKGROUND: Applied tube voltage (kilovolts, kV) and tube current (milliampere seconds, mAs) affect CT radiation dose and image quality and should be optimised for the individual patient. CARE kV determines the kV and mAs providing the lowest dose to the patient, whilst maintaining user-defined reference image quality. Given that kV changes affect CT values which are used to obtain attenuation maps, the aim was to evaluate the effect of kV changes on PET quantification and CT radiation dose using phantoms. METHOD: Four phantoms ('Lungman', 'Lungman plus fat', 'Esser' and 'NEMA image quality' (NEMA IQ)) containing F-18 sources underwent 1 PET and 5 CT scans, with CARE kV on (automatic kV selection and mAs modulation) and in semi mode with specified tube voltages of 140, 120, 100 and 80 kV (mAs modulation only). A CARE kV image quality reference of 120 kV/50 mAs was used. Impact on PET quantification was determined by comparing measured activity concentrations for PET reconstructions from different CT scans with the reconstruction using the 120 kV reference, and dose (DLP, CTDIvol) differences calculated by comparing doses from all kV settings with the 120 kV reference. RESULTS: CARE kV-determined optimal tube voltage and CARE kV 'on' dose (DLP) savings compared with the 120 kV reference were: Lungman, 100 kV, 2.0%; Lungman plus fat, 120 kV, 0%; Esser, 100 kV, 9.3%; NEMA IQ, 100 kV, 3.4%. Using tube voltages in CARE kV 'semi' mode which were not advised by CARE kV 'on' resulted in dose increases ≤ 65% compared with the 120 kV reference (greatest difference Lungman plus fat, 80 kV). Clinically insignificant differences in PET activity quantification of up to 0.7% (Lungman, 100 kV, mean measured activity concentration) were observed when using the optimal tube voltage advised by CARE kV. Differences in PET quantification of up to 4.0% (Lungman, 140 kV, maximum measured activity concentration) were found over the full selection of tube voltages in semi mode, with the greatest differences seen at the most suboptimal kV for each phantom. However, most differences were within 1%. CONCLUSIONS: CARE kV on can provide CT radiation dose savings without concern over changes in PET quantification.
Entities:
Keywords:
CARE kV; PET-CT; dose; kV; optimisation; quantification
Authors: Madeleine Kok; Casper Mihl; Anna Seehofnerová; Jakub Turek; Gregor Jost; Hubertus Pietsch; Ulrike Haberland; Joachim E Wildberger; Marco Das Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Hyun Woo Kwon; Jong Phil Kim; Hong Jae Lee; Jin Chul Paeng; Jae Sung Lee; Gi Jeong Cheon; Dong Soo Lee; June-Key Chung; Keon Wook Kang Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Josep M Martí-Climent; Elena Prieto; Verónica Morán; Lidia Sancho; Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile; Javier Arbizu; María J García-Velloso; José A Richter Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Elena Tonkopi; Eline Jahre Wikan; Tor Olav Hovland; Sivert Høgset; Thomas Alexander Kofod; Selasi K Sefenu; Emily Hughes-Ryan; Dakota D Entremont-O Connell; Catherine Gunn; Tanja Holter; Safora Johansen Journal: Acta Radiol Open Date: 2022-10-07