Literature DB >> 33728206

The Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High-Density Renal Stone on Non-Contrast Computed Tomography.

Sami Ullah1, Syed Razi Muhammad1, Rizwan Farooque2, Umar Farooque3, Fnu Farukhuddin4, Muhammad Daim Bin Zafar5, Chinmay Khadke6, Ahmad Usman7, Julio Perez8, Mostafa A Shehata9.   

Abstract

Introduction Urinary lithiasis is usually managed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Patients are examined using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) in order to evaluate the feasibility of ESWL, according to where the stone is located and how big is its size. The objective of this study is to determine the outcomes of ESWL in patients having high-density renal stone, evaluated using NCCT. Materials and methods A descriptive case series study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi for six months. Patients of either gender aged between 25-50 years, who presented with solitary renal and ureteric calculi of 0.5-2 cm in diameter and high-density renal stones [>750 hounsfield units (HU)] were enrolled. ESWL was performed and a satisfactory outcome was defined as complete stone clearance in less than or equal to three ESWL sessions. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used to analyze frequencies and percentages of the number of ESWL sessions, complete renal stone clearances, and satisfactory outcomes at the end of 12 weeks. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results The mean age of the patient was reported to be 34.08 ± 9.53 years. 51.6% male preponderance was noticed. Renal and ureteric stones were found in 69.7% and 30.3% of patients, respectively. 21.3% of patients showed stone clearance after two ESWL sessions, 27% of patients after three ESWL sessions, and 51.6% of patients after four ESWL sessions. Stone clearance was found in 58.2% of patients and a satisfactory outcome was found in 42.6% of patients. Conclusions Our results signify a satisfactory outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for high-density renal stone on non-contrast computed tomography. Further studies on a larger scale are needed to validate these results.
Copyright © 2021, Ullah et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extracorporeal shock waves lithotripsy; high-density renal stone; non-contrast computed tomography; outcomes; renal stone

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728206      PMCID: PMC7949630          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  19 in total

1.  New onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: age related incidence and prediction by intrarenal resistive index.

Authors:  G Janetschek; F Frauscher; R Knapp; G Höfle; R Peschel; G Bartsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Stone fragility--a new therapeutic distinction.

Authors:  S P Dretler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.

Authors:  Gyan Pareek; Sean P Hedican; Fred T Lee; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography.

Authors:  J R Fielding; G Steele; L A Fox; H Heller; K R Loughlin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Diagnostic value of CT numbers in pelvocalyceal filling defects.

Authors:  R A Parienty; R Ducellier; J Pradel; J M Lubrano; F Coquille; F Richard
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography.

Authors:  M R Mostafavi; R D Ernst; B Saltzman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.

Authors:  Narmada P Gupta; Mohd S Ansari; Pawan Kesarvani; Annu Kapoor; Seema Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ahmed M El-Assmy; Osama Mansour; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century.

Authors:  Athanasios N Argyropoulos; David A Tolley
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Comparison of 2 generations of piezoelectric lithotriptors using matched pair analysis.

Authors:  C F Ng; L McLornan; T J Thompson; D A Tolley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Importance of precise imaging for stone identification during shockwave lithotripsy: a critical evaluation of "OptiVision" as a post-processing radiography imaging modality.

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Mehmet Ferhat; Rei Ohara; Sameer Parmar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.436

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.