Literature DB >> 17161522

A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.

Ahmed R El-Nahas1, Ahmed M El-Assmy, Osama Mansour, Khaled Z Sheir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) as a possible predictor of renal stone disintegration by shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 120 consecutive patients (71 males, 49 females; mean age: 42.6 yr) with a solitary renal stone of 0.5-2.5 cm in length. NCCT was performed using a multidetector row CT scanner at 120 KV and 240 mA, with 1.25-mm collimation. A bone window was used to measure stone attenuation values. SWL was performed with an electromagnetic lithotripter. Failure of disintegration was defined as no fragmentation of the stone after three sessions. The impact of patients' sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) and the stones' laterality, location, volume, mean attenuation value, and the skin-to-stone distance on disintegration were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Failure of disintegration was observed in 15 patients (12.5%). BMI and stone density >1000 HU were the significant independent predictors of failure (p=0.04 and 0.02, respectively). The success rate of extracorporeal SWL at 3 mo was 87.5% (105 of 120 patients); 90 patients were stone free and 15 had residual fragments<4 mm. The only significant predictor of residual fragments was stone density (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and increased stone density as detected by NCCT are significant predictors of failure to fragment renal stones by SWL. An alternative treatment should be devised for obese patients with stone density>1000 HU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17161522     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  79 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

2.  Predictive value of low tube voltage and dual-energy CT for successful shock wave lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Remo Largo; Paul Stolzmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Pirmin Wolfsgruber; Tullio Sulser; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

5.  Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy via a large ureteral access sheath for kidney stones >2 cm: a bicentric prospective assessment.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Miernik; Martin Schoenthaler; Konrad Wilhelm; Ulrich Wetterauer; Marcin Zyczkowski; Andrzej Paradysz; Piotr Bryniarski
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Does previous failed ESWL have a negative impact of on the outcome of ureterorenoscopy? A matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Prodromos Philippou; David Payne; Kim Davenport; Anthony G Timoney; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  [Urolithiasis 2016 : Reliable, effective and low radiation exposure].

Authors:  A Neisius; C Thomas; F C Roos; W Jäger; I Tsaur; G Bartsch; T Knoll; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  The hounsfield unit value calculated with the aid of non-contrast computed tomography and its effect on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Alper Gok; Haci Polat; Ali Cift; Mehmet Ozgur Yucel; Bahri Gok; Mehmet Sirik; Can Benlioglu; Bedreddin Kalyenci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Pain in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James Theo Berwin; T El-Husseiny; A G Papatsoris; T Hajdinjak; J Masood; N Buchholz
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.