Literature DB >> 3361657

Stone fragility--a new therapeutic distinction.

S P Dretler1.   

Abstract

The ESWL retreatment rates for calculi of 1.1 to 3.0 cm. varied according to stone composition: calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) 10.3%, calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD) 2.8%, struvite/apatite calculi 6.4%. Fine detail in-vitro radiographs of approximately equal sized calculi composed of COM, COD, struvite, brushite, uric acid and cystine showed structural differences which may account for differences in their fragility. The same six calculi were fragmented in vitro in the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor by 200 shocks at 18 KV and the percent weight of each calculus able to be filtered through a two mm. sieve was determined; COD and uric acid (100%); COM (64%); struvite (57%); brushite (47%); cystine (16%). The linear density of these calculi, measured by single photon emission absorbtiometry, correlated with radio-density, not fragility. Calculi of varying composition respond differently to shock wave fragmentation. The assessment of the capability of ESWL to fragment a stone will determine the size stone selected for treatment. Therefore, "stone fragility" is a new distinction which deserves to be included in the conversation about urinary calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3361657     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42801-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  33 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Age-related delay in urinary stone clearance in elderly patients with solitary proximal ureteral calculi treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osamu Ichiyanagi; Akira Nagaoka; Takuji Izumi; Yuko Kawamura; Tomoyuki Kato
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.

Authors:  Serdar Celik; Ozan Bozkurt; Fatih Gulbey Kaya; Sedat Egriboyun; Omer Demir; Mustafa Secil; Ilhan Celebi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL).

Authors:  James C Williams; Chad A Zarse; Molly E Jackson; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2007-04-05

Review 5.  Management of complex renal calculi.

Authors:  S A Holmes; H N Whitfield
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Mechanical testing of urinary calculi.

Authors:  N P Cohen; H N Whitfield
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Differentiation of calcium oxalate monohydrate and calcium oxalate dihydrate stones using quantitative morphological information from micro-computerized and clinical computerized tomography.

Authors:  Xinhui Duan; Mingliang Qu; Jia Wang; James Trevathan; Terri Vrtiska; James C Williams; Amy Krambeck; John Lieske; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Estimation of urinary stone composition by automated processing of CT images.

Authors:  Grégoire Chevreau; Jocelyne Troccaz; Pierre Conort; Raphaëlle Renard-Penna; Alain Mallet; Michel Daudon; Pierre Mozer
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-08-27

10.  Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Samuel C Kim; Erin K Burns; James E Lingeman; Ryan F Paterson; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.