| Literature DB >> 33712580 |
Gerald S Wilkinson1, Steve Horvath2,3, Danielle M Adams4, Amin Haghani5, Ake T Lu5, Joseph Zoller6, Charles E Breeze7, Bryan D Arnold8, Hope C Ball9, Gerald G Carter10, Lisa Noelle Cooper9, Dina K N Dechmann11,12,13, Paolo Devanna14, Nicolas J Fasel15, Alexander V Galazyuk9, Linus Günther16, Edward Hurme4,12, Gareth Jones17, Mirjam Knörnschild13,16, Ella Z Lattenkamp14,18, Caesar Z Li6, Frieder Mayer16, Josephine A Reinhardt19, Rodrigo A Medellin20, Martina Nagy16, Brian Pope21, Megan L Power22, Roger D Ransome17, Emma C Teeling22, Sonja C Vernes14,23,24, Daniel Zamora-Mejías20, Joshua Zhang5, Paul A Faure25, Lucas J Greville25, L Gerardo Herrera M26, José J Flores-Martínez27.
Abstract
Exceptionally long-lived species, including many bats, rarely show overt signs of aging, making it difficult to determine why species differ in lifespan. Here, we use DNA methylation (DNAm) profiles from 712 known-age bats, representing 26 species, to identify epigenetic changes associated with age and longevity. We demonstrate that DNAm accurately predicts chronological age. Across species, longevity is negatively associated with the rate of DNAm change at age-associated sites. Furthermore, analysis of several bat genomes reveals that hypermethylated age- and longevity-associated sites are disproportionately located in promoter regions of key transcription factors (TF) and enriched for histone and chromatin features associated with transcriptional regulation. Predicted TF binding site motifs and enrichment analyses indicate that age-related methylation change is influenced by developmental processes, while longevity-related DNAm change is associated with innate immunity or tumorigenesis genes, suggesting that bat longevity results from augmented immune response and cancer suppression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33712580 PMCID: PMC7955057 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21900-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 17.694
Fig. 1Epigenetic clocks accurately predict the chronological age of bats.
a Leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation based on penalized regression gave a correlation of 0.95 with a median absolute error (MAE) of 0.74 years between observed and predicted (DNAmAge) age (after square-root transform) for 26 bat species. To ensure an unbiased cross-validation analysis, we allowed the number of CpGs to change with the respective training data. b LOO cross-validation based on penalized regression of 51 Pteropus vampyrus samples gave a correlation of 0.99 with MAE of 0.72 years between observed and predicted age. c LOO cross-validation based on penalized regression of 40 Rhinolophus ferrumequinum samples gave a correlation of 0.96 with MAE of 1.11 years between observed and predicted age. d Cross-validation analysis in which the DNAm data for one species was left out (LOSO) and ages are predicted for that species using a clock estimated with the remaining data. The resulting correlation between observed and predicted age is 0.84 (MAE = 1.41 years). Additional epigenetic clocks for individual species and genera are in Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2.
Fig. 2Species longevity is predicted by the mean rate of DNAm change.
a After controlling for phylogeny using phylogenetic generalized least squares regression, mean DNAm rate at 1165 hypermethylating age DMPs correlate with longevity (r = −0.704, t = −4.95, P = 6.79e−5), b as does mean DNAm rate at 835 hypomethylating age DMPs (r = −0.682, t = −4.27, P = 3.42e−4). Species longevity is represented by the longevity quotient (LQ), which is the ratio of the observed species maximum lifespan to the maximum lifespan predicted for a nonflying placental mammal of the same body mass[29]. For example, the maximum longevity of Myotis lucifugus (10) is over six times longer than expected, while the maximum longevity of Molossus molossus (9) is equal to an average placental mammal of the same body size. The five species used for identifying longevity DMPs by the difference in methylation rate are indicated by red triangles (long-lived) and blue triangles (short-lived). Only species with more than ten samples are included.
Fig. 3Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) for age and longevity are widely distributed and partially overlap.
a Negative log P for age-associated DMPs plotted against location on each Rhinolophus ferrumequinum chromosome. The top 2000 age-associated DMPs are darkened with increasing DNAm indicated by red and decreasing DNAm indicated by blue. Hypermethylated age-DMPs are underrepresented on chromosome 1, which is syntenic with the human X chromosome. b Longevity DMPs are also distributed across all R. ferrumequinum chromosomes. Darkened symbols indicate 1491 significant (BY 5% FDR) longevity DMPs with colors indicating DNAm direction as in (a). c Effect of DNAm change on age plotted against the effect of DNAm change on longevity (see “Methods”) illustrates the association between age and longevity effects. Significant sites are colored blue for age, red for longevity, and purple for both age and longevity. Symbols for the orthologous gene with the nearest transcription start site (TSS) to the DMP are indicated for a sample of extreme age and longevity DMPs. Bottom panels indicate DMPs that map to different genes in the short-lived species, M. molossus, and the long-lived species, R. ferrumequinum, with the M. molossus gene indicated after /. Note that most extreme age and longevity DMPs in promoter regions (i.e., −10,000 to +1000 bp from the TSS) are in the upper right panel, i.e., nearest the same gene in both species. d Age DMPs overlap 17% with hypermethylating (+) and hypomethylating (−) longevity DMPs in M. molossus. Long-lived bat species show similar patterns (Supplementary Fig. 5a). e Number of unique genes nearest age and longevity DMPs for M. molossus. Signs on numbers in the overlap region indicate methylation direction for age then longevity. Long-lived bat species show similar patterns (Supplementary Fig. 5b).
Fig. 4Age and longevity DMPs are enriched in promoter regions of genes associated with immunity and cancer.
a CpG annotation for the short-lived bat, M. molossus, in comparison to genome regions where probes map to the human genome (HG19) shows that fewer than half of the probes that map to a promoter region in the bat also map to a promoter region in human (see also Supplementary Fig. 4). Colors indicate genomic regions in the human genome as indicated in the legend. b In contrast, CpG annotation comparison between two phylogenetically distant bat species, M. molossus, and R. ferrumequinum, indicates greater probe conservation with respect to gene proximity (see also Supplementary Fig. 4). Colors indicate genomic regions in the genome of R. ferrumequinum. c The top 2000 age DMPs are highly enriched near promoter regions with over 95% exhibiting hypermethylation in M. molossus and other bats (Supplementary Fig. 5). Red indicates DMPs associated with increasing DNAm, blue indicates DMPs associated with decreasing DNAm. d The 1491 longevity DMPs are also enriched in promoter regions with over 80% exhibiting hypermethylation in M. molossus and other bats (Supplementary Fig. 5). Color as in (d). e Enriched biological processes for unique M. molossus genes from promoter regions are only significant for hypermethylating age and longevity DMPs. Only three significant GO terms from each parent–child group are shown to minimize redundancy. f Enrichment analysis of protein class for unique M. molossus genes from promoter regions reveals significant enrichment of helix-turn-helix transcription factors (TF) only for hypermethylated DMPs associated with age and longevity. Cell color indicates significance (negative log P for GO terms with adjP < 10e−4) of enrichment in (e) and (f). g Overlap between genes associated with longevity, innate immunity, or frequently mutated in human tumors identified in M. molossus. Enrichment analyses using genome annotations from other bat species produce similar results (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Fig. 5Functional overlap analysis of DMPs reveals the role of key transcriptional regulators.
Histone marks (e.g., H3K27me3 = trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3) are denoted by shape and color as indicated in the legend for cell lines derived from skin, muscle, or blood for DMPs mapped in Desmodus rotundus, a long lifespan species, for (a) age and (b) longevity with darkened symbols indicating significance (BY 5% FDR) and ±indicating positive/negative rates of DNAm change. Enriched chromatin states (e.g., ReprPC = Repressed Polycomb) as predicted by a hidden Markov model for cell lines derived from skin, muscle, or blood are denoted by shape and color as indicated in the legend for (c) age and (d) longevity DMPs mapped in Desmodus rotundus with darkened symbols indicating significance (BY 5% FDR) and ±indicating positive/negative rates of DNAm change. e Transcription factor clusters enriched for hypermethylated (+) and hypomethylated (−) age or longevity DMPs with cell color indicating significance (negative log P, adjP < 10e−4) of overlap with predicted transcription factor binding sites in probe sequences using a hypergeometric test. f Top-ranked transcription factors associated with the change in expression of genes containing age or longevity DMPs in promoter regions in M. molossus, with integrative rank significance (see “Methods”) indicated as negative log P. Genes frequently mutated in human tumors are indicated by (c), and those involved in innate immunity by i. Only genes with hypermethylated sites in promoter regions showed evidence of enrichment. Analyses using genome annotations from other bat species produce similar results (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Summarya of samples used for DNAm profiling.
| Source | #F | #M | Exact | Yg | Old | Max age | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 21 | 2 | 1 | 0.2 | 7 | 14.8 | |
| C | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 19.2 | |
| C | 17 | 15 | 32 | 0.2 | 10.5 | 17.0 | |
| C | 6 | 4 | 10 | 6.7 | 12.9 | 13.0 | |
| C | 27 | 17 | 41 | 0.3 | 17.3 | 29.9 | |
| C | 17 | 7 | 24 | 3.4 | 16.5 | 21.8 | |
| C | 18 | 41 | 59 | 0.3 | 18.3 | 23.0 | |
| F | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0.2 | 5 | 10.1 | |
| F | 9 | 5 | 6 | 0.3 | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
| F | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0.1 | 5 | 34.0 | |
| F | 36 | 2 | 33 | 1 | 9 | 37.1 | |
| F | 11 | 6 | 4 | 0.1 | 2 | 10.0 | |
| F | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0.9 | 2 | 12.0 | |
| C | 31 | 19 | 42 | 0.1 | 17.7 | 18.0 | |
| F | 61 | 10 | 52 | 0.1 | 16.5 | 22.0 | |
| C | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10.9 | 14.2 | 44.0 | |
| C | 28 | 12 | 40 | 0.4 | 19.3 | 26.5 | |
| C | 10 | 6 | 16 | 6.1 | 16.7 | 23.6 | |
| C | 24 | 22 | 45 | 0.8 | 17.3 | 17.3 | |
| C | 12 | 7 | 19 | 4 | 20.9 | 28.0 | |
| C | 27 | 24 | 51 | 0.6 | 22.4 | 24.0 | |
| F | 40 | 0 | 39 | 0.1 | 21.1 | 30.5 | |
| F | 6 | 16 | 15 | 0.1 | 6 | 8.5 | |
| C | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 22.9 | |
| F | 20 | 9 | 24 | 0.2 | 8.3 | 11.0 | |
| C | 9 | 10 | 15 | 0.2 | 6.2 | 12.0 |
aFamily: E = Emballonuridae, M = Molossidae, Ph = Phyllostomidae, Pt = Pteropodidae, R = Rhinolophidae, V = Vespertilionidae; Source: F = field, C = captivity; #F, #M: number of samples for each sex; Exact N: number of individuals with exact age estimates; Yg, Old: youngest (Yg) and oldest (Old) individual sampled in years; Max age: maximum recorded age in years.