Literature DB >> 33688666

Factors Associated with Serious Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.

Takashi Yoshioka1, Ryo Okubo2, Takahiro Tabuchi3, Satomi Odani3, Tomohiro Shinozaki4, Yusuke Tsugawa5,6.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have a negative impact on mental health of the population, leading to higher suicide rates, in many countries. However, little is known about risk factors associated with worsened mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors associated with serious psychological distress (SPD) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study using a large-scale internet survey conducted between August 25 and September 30, 2020, in Japan. EXPOSURES: Demographics (age, gender, marital status, family composition, and caregiving burden), socio-economic status (income level, employment type, educational attainment), the experience of domestic violence (DV), the state of emergency, fear of COVID-19, and stigma related to COVID-19. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of SPD, defined as Kessler 6 scale score ≥13.
RESULTS: Among 25,482 individuals included in this study, 2,556 (10%) met the criteria of SPD. Overall, women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.59; 95%CI, 1.17-2.16; P=0.003), ages 15-29 (aOR compared with ages 45-59, 2.35; 95%CI, 1.64-3.38; P<0.001), low income (aOR compared with intermediate income, 1.70; 95%CI, 1.16-2.49; P=0.007), providing caregiving to family members (aOR, 5.48; 95%CI, 3.51-8.56; P<0.001), experiencing DV (aOR, 5.72; 95%CI, 3.81-8.59; P<0.001), and fear of COVID-19 (aOR, 1.96; 95%CI, 1.55-2.48; P<0.001) were associated with a higher rate of SPD. Among women aged 15-29 years, who experienced the highest rate of SPD, caregiving, DV, fear of COVID-19, and COVID-19-related stigma were associated with a higher rate of SPD; whereas economic situation (income level and employment type) and social isolation (marital status) were not associated with the prevalence of SPD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Economic situation, caregiving burden, DV, and fear of COVID-19 were independently associated with SPD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among young women-who have a higher risk of suicide during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan-similar factors, except economic situation, were associated with a higher rate of SPD. Targeted interventions based on age and gender may be more effective in mitigating the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the population's mental health.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33688666      PMCID: PMC7941641          DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.27.21252458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  medRxiv


INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected more than 110 million people, contributed to over 2.4 million deaths globally,[1] and has impacted many aspects of our lives. The COVID-19 pandemic has put a significant burden on our healthcare systems, and many countries have been struggling with an economic downturn due to reduced economic activities or lockdowns, leading to widened social inequalities.[2] Reduced social interactions due to social distancing and isolation, as well as economic downturns due to the pandemic, have the potential to negatively impact mental health conditions leading to psychological distress and increased risk for psychiatric disorders.[3,4] Some countries have been experiencing an increased suicide rate during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, in Japan, the number of people who died of suicide increased from 20,169 in 2019 to 20,919 in 2020.[5] It is important to note that the suicide rate has increased dramatically among young women during the COVID-19 pandemic,[6] and some have speculated that the economic downturn combined with a relatively unstable employment status often experienced among this population may be underlying reasons for increased suicides among this population. Although there are people who commit suicide without experiencing psychological distress, it is clearly one of the major risk factors for suicide.[7] Therefore, identifying risk factors associated with psychological distress is critically important for policymakers to design interventions that can effectively mitigate deteriorating mental health conditions. Research has found that those who are vulnerable to financial stressors (e.g., low-income levels or unemployed) are associated with psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.[8-10] Notably, women and the young are more likely to experience psychological distress,[10] although the risk of severe disease and death due to COVID-19 is higher in men and older adults.[11,12] This may be attributable to the difference in the prevalence of psychological distress. For example, depression and anxiety are generally more prevalent among women than men.[13] However, specific risk factors associated with psychological distress in women—except the difference in the prevalence of depression and anxiety—remain unknown, making it difficult for policymakers to design interventions that can effectively mitigate deteriorating mental health conditions in the population. Moreover, to our knowledge, no study to date has investigated the factors associated with psychological distress among young women who are experiencing a higher risk of suicide during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, using data from a large-scale internet survey conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (between August 25 and September 30, 2020) in Japan, we sought to answer two key questions: What are the factors associated with a higher prevalence of serious psychological distress (SPD) during the COVID-19 pandemic? What are the risk factors of SPD among young women who are exhibiting a dramatic increase in suicides during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan?

METHODS

Data

We analyzed data from the Japan “COVID-19 and Society” Internet Survey (JACSIS). The JACSIS is a large-scale, internet-based, self-reported questionnaire survey via a survey panel provided by a major internet survey agency in Japan (Rakuten Insight, Inc., Tokyo, Japan).[14] The total number of individuals included in the survey panel was approximately 2.2 million and comprises individuals from diverse socio-economic backgrounds—such as educational level, household income and number of household members, and marital status—to be nationally representative.[15] This study reached out to 224,389 participants using a stratified sampling approach by gender, age, and each prefecture from the panel. The study enrollment continued until it achieved the target numbers of respondents whose age, gender, and prefectures had been a priori set (based on the distribution of the general Japanese population in 2019; and 28,000 respondents). The survey was conducted between August 25 and September 30, 2020. The overall response rate accounted for 12.5% (28,000/224,389). This study excluded respondents whose answers were inconsistent (we included specific items in the survey to identify inconsistent responses).

Exposure variables

Our exposure variables of interest were respondents’ demographics and socio-economic status (SES),[16] the experience of domestic violence (DV),[17] the state of emergency (SOE) in response to COVID-19 (Supplementary Method),[18] fear of COVID-19,[19] and stigma related to COVID-19.[20] The demographics included age groups (15–29, 30–44, 45–59, 60–79 years), gender,[16] marital status (unmarried, married, and widowed/separated), having children, and caregiving to an elderly/disabled family member.[21] The SES included educational attainment (high-school-educated or lower, and college-educated or higher),[22] income level (categorized by the tertiles of household equivalent income [low, <2.5 million JPY; intermediate, 2.5–4.3 million JPY; high, 4.3< million JPY; unknown/declined to answer]),[23] employment type (employer, self-employed, regular employee, non-regular employee, and unemployed).[24] The experiences of DV (including any of physical, sexual, and financial violence) and COVID-19-related stigma were defined using the specific survey questions (Supplementary Method). Fear of COVID-19 was categorized by the median of the fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S),[25] which is validated in Japanese.[26]

Adjustment variables

Adjustment variables were health-related status as follows: smoking status (never, ever, and current smokers), alcohol use (never, ever, and current users), and comorbidities. The comorbidities included those at risk of severe COVID-19, which may influence mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic (hypertension, diabetes, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, and psychiatric disorders).[27,28]

Outcome variable

The outcome variable is SPD, defined as Kessler 6 scale (K-6) score ≥13.[29,30] K-6 was validated in Japanese.[31] SPD is a relevant outcome for policy because it is strongly associated with mental health services.[32]

Statistical analysis

First, for each gender, we described the exposure variables (demographics, SES, experience of DV, SOE in relation to COVID-19, fear of and stigma related to COVID-19) and the adjustment variables (smoking status, alcohol use, and comorbidities) with number and proportion (%) of each category. Second, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine the potential risk factors of SPD among exposure variables. To characterize the risk factors for young women in addition to the general public, we also conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis focusing on women aged 15–29 years whom prior reports have shown a dramatic increase in the suicide rate in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic[6] Regarding this analysis, some comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, COPD, cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer) were uncommon among young women, and therefore, were not included as adjustment variables. To account for the differences between the sociodemographic status in actual respondents from the survey panel and the Japanese general public, we used inverse sampling-probability weighting for all analyses.[33,34] The sampling weights using propensity scores were calculated by fitting a logistic regression model using sociodemographic and health-related characteristics to adjust for the difference in respondents between the current internet survey and the 2016 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions, which is a nationally representative survey in Japan.[33] Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. The data were analyzed using STATA version 16.1 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). We obtained web-based informed consent from all respondents. The Institutional Review Board of Osaka International Cancer Institute approved this study (No. 20084).

RESULTS

Characteristics of respondents

After excluding 2,518 respondents who met the exclusion criteria, a total of 25,482 respondents (91.0% of the overall survey respondents) were included in our study. Of the overall weighted respondents, 50.3% were women; 27.2% were ages 45–59; 51.2% were college-educated or higher; 28.8% were low-income level; 63.2% were currently married; and 30.9% were regular employees (Table 1). The characteristics of overall unweighted respondents and those aged 15–29 years were shown in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2, respectively.
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of weighted respondents

CharacteristicsOverall n = 25,482
Women12,810(50.3)
Age (years)15–294,426(17.4)
30–445,996(23.5)
45–596,921(27.2)
60–798,139(31.9)
Educational attainmentHigh-school-educated or lower12,435(48.8)
College-educated or higher13,047(51.2)
Income levelLow7,336(28.8)
Intermediate6,816(26.8)
High5,733(22.5)
Unknown/declined to answer5,596(22.0)
Marital statusMarried16,100(63.2)
Unmarried6,047(23.7)
Widowed/ separated3,336(13.1)
EmploymentEmployer1,007(4.0)
Self-employed2,008(7.9)
Regular employee7,876(30.9)
Non-regular employee4,870(19.1)
Unemployed9,721(38.2)
Having children9,602(37.7)
Caregiving to an elderly/disabled family member2,500(9.8)
Experiencing DV2,831(11.1)
SOE in response to COVID-1911,041(43.3)
Fear of COVID-1911,569(45.4)
Experiencing COVID-19-related stigma864(3.4)
Smoking statusNever13,472(52.9)
Ever8,480(33.3)
Current3,527(13.8)
Alcohol useNever5,639(22.1)
Ever8,315(32.6)
Current11,531(45.3)
ComorbiditiesHypertension5,053(19.8)
Diabetes1,888(7.4)
Asthma/COPD1,702(6.7)
Cardiovascular disease1,040(4.1)
Stroke459(1.8)
Cancer892(3.5)
Psychiatric disorders1,970(7.7)

Abbreviations. CI: confidence intervals, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, DV: domestic violence, SOE: state of emergency, COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019.

Notes. All proportions are expressed as weighted numbers and weighted percentages (%). The sum of respondents did not necessarily equal the number of categories because of sample weighting and rounding. The weights, which were scaled such that the total came to 25,482 (original number of respondents), were predicted from the logistic model including area (residence), marital status, education, home-ownership (household), self-rated health and smoking status were adjusted for in individuals aged 20-79 years; and area, education, home-ownership (household) and self-rated health were adjusted for (omitting marital and smoking status) in individuals aged 15-19 years.

Factors associated with SPD in overall respondents

Of the overall weighted respondents, SPD was prevalent in 10.0% of the individuals (which amounts to 2,556 cases among 25,482 weighted total). After adjusting for smoking status, alcohol use, and comorbidities, women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17–2.16; P=0.003); aged 15–29 (aOR, 2.35 compared with ages 45–59 years; 95%CI, 1.64–3.38; P<0.001) and 30–44 (aOR, 1.67; 95%CI, 1.35–2.08; P<0.001); low- (aOR, 1.70 compared with intermediate-income; 95%CI, 1.16–2.49; P=0.007) and high-income level (aOR, 1.74; 95%CI, 1.25–2.42; P=0.001); self-employed (aOR, 2.11 compared with regular employee; 95%CI, 1.21–3.68; P=0.008); caregiving to an elderly/disabled family member (aOR, 5.48; 95%CI, 3.51–8.56; P<0.001); experiencing DV (aOR, 5.72; 95%CI, 3.81–8.59; P<0.001); and fear of COVID-19 (aOR, 1.96; 95%CI, 1.55–2.48; P<0.001) were independently associated with higher odds of experiencing SPD (Table 2)
Table 2.

Factors associated with serious psychological distress among the general population

CharacteristicsaOR(95% CI)P value
Women1.59(1.17–2.16)0.003
Age (years)15–292.35(1.64–3.38)<0.001
30–441.67(1.35–2.08)<0.001
45–59Ref
60–790.50(0.3–0.81)0.005
Educational attainmentCollege-educated or higher1.11(0.86–1.43)0.44
Income levelLow1.70(1.16–2.49)0.007
IntermediateRef
High1.74(1.25–2.42)0.001
Unknown/declined to answer1.19(0.86–1.66)0.29
Marital statusMarriedRef
Unmarried1.26(0.88–1.81)0.20
Widowed/separated1.45(0.88–2.37)0.14
EmploymentEmployer1.11(0.35–3.49)0.86
Self-employed2.11(1.21–3.68)0.008
Regular employeeRef
Non-regular employee0.92(0.68–1.25)0.59
Unemployed0.75(0.51–1.1)0.14
Having children0.97(0.7–1.35)0.86
Caregiving to an elderly/disabled family member5.48(3.51–8.56)<0.001
Experiencing DV5.72(3.81–8.59)<0.001
SOE in response to COVID-191.23(0.98–1.56)0.08
Fear of COVID-191.96(1.55–2.48)<0.001
Experiencing COVID-19-related stigma1.22(0.69–2.13)0.50

Abbreviations: aOR: adjusted odds ratio, CI: confidence intervals, DV: domestic violence, SOE: state of emergency, COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019.

Notes: Adjusted for smoking status, alcohol use, and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, and psychiatric disorder). All CIs and P values were based on the robust variance estimator to account for the inverse probability weighting.

Analysis focusing on women aged 15-29 years

Of 2,295 weighted women aged 15–29 years, SPD was prevalent in 15.0% individuals (which amounts to 344 cases among 2,295 weighted samples). After adjustment for potential confounders, caregiving to an elderly/disabled family member (aOR, 4.05; 95%CI, 1.69–9.75; P=0.002), experiencing DV (aOR, 3.44; 95%CI, 1.94–6.11; P<0.001), fear of COVID-19 (aOR, 1.94; 95%CI, 1.30–2.89; P=0.001), and experiencing COVID-19-related stigma (aOR, 2.42; 95%CI, 1.31–4.50; P=0.005) had a significantly higher odds ratio of SPD (Table 3). We found that economic status (e.g., income level, employment type) or social isolation (e.g., unmarried) were not associated with a higher prevalence of SPD among this population.
Table 3.

Factors associated with serious psychological distress among those aged 15–29 years (population with the highest risk of suicide during the COVID-19 pandemic)

CharacteristicsaOR(95% CI)P value
Age (years)15–191.12(0.59–2.12)0.74
Educational attainmentCollege or higher0.83(0.50–1.39)0.48
Income levelLow1.31(0.71–2.42)0.39
IntermediateRef
High1.31(0.63–2.74)0.47
Not answered0.78(0.38–1.61)0.51
Marital statusMarriedRef
Unmarried1.31(0.71–2.44)0.39
Widowed/separated0.68(0.17–2.75)0.59
EmploymentEmployer1.29(0.44–3.77)0.65
Self-employed0.62(0.12–3.22)0.57
Regular employeeRef
Non-regular employee0.87(0.45–1.67)0.67
Unemployed0.81(0.44–1.49)0.49
Having children0.77(0.41–1.45)0.42
Caregiving to an elderly/disabled family member4.05(1.69–9.75)0.002
Experiencing DV3.44(1.94–6.11)<0.001
SOE in response to COVID-191.09(0.75–1.59)0.64
Fear of COVID-191.94(1.30–2.89)0.001
Experiencing COVID-19-related stigma2.42(1.31–4.50)0.005

Abbreviations: aOR: adjusted odds ratio, CI: confidence intervals, DV: domestic violence, SOE: state of emergency, COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019.

Notes: Adjusted for smoking status, alcohol use, and comorbidities (asthma and psychiatric disorder). All CIs and P values were based on the robust variance estimator to account for the inverse probability weighting.

DISCUSSION

Using data from a nationally representative survey conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we identified several important factors that were associated with a higher rate of SPD in Japan. We found that women, younger age, income level, employment type, caregiving status, DV experience, and fear of COVID-19 were independently associated with SPD. Among young women—who are exhibiting an increased suicide rate during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan—experiencing DV, fear of COVID-19, and COVID-19-related stigma were risk factors of SPD. On the other hand, economic situation and social isolation—factors considered to be causes of an increased suicide rate among this population—were not associated with the rate of SPD. Taken together, these findings indicate that underlying reasons for SPD may vary based on subgroups of the population, and therefore, targeted interventions based on age and gender may be more effective in mitigating negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the population’s mental health. There are several potential mechanisms that may explain the factors associated with SPD in Japan. First, economic downturns due to the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively impact the mental health condition of the population. For example, we found that having a low-income level and being self-employed were associated with SPD, suggesting that the individuals in the general public were potentially vulnerable population affected by economic stagnation itself and social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[35,36] Second, social isolation due to the SOE may cause a heavier burden of caregiving as well as DV from partners, resulting in mental illness. In our study, caregiving to an elderly/disabled family member was associated with SPD in both the general public and young women. It is known that reported cases of DV increased while people were staying home,[37] probably leading to worse mental health conditions. Finally, as COVID-19 spread and society dramatically changed, fears about COVID-19 gradually developed making people psychologically unstable. Our findings, in which fear of COVID-19 was associated with SPD in all analyses, support this hypothesis. Evidence is limited as to which factors affected mental health status at the population level during the COVID-19 pandemic. Wang et al. conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the factors associated with psychological distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) in the general population, and found that women, younger age, and lower SES were associated with both anxiety and depression.[10] Regarding gender- and age-related risk factors, Rehm and Shield reported that anxiety and depression are more prevalent in women than in men.[13] In addition to such pre-existing psychological distress, previous studies reported that women in preconception,[38] pregnancy,[39] or postpartum periods[40] experienced anxiety or depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. While informative, evidence regarding young women in the factors associated with SPD is limited. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has examined the risk factors of SPD comprehensively in both the general public and the mentally vulnerable population (young women) using large-scale, nationally representative data. Our study has limitations. First, because this survey was conducted between August and September 2020, it is possible that our findings would have been different if more recent data had been used. However, the data was collected just before October, 2020, when suicides among young women actually increased in Japan,[41] and therefore, our findings may reflect the most critical period regarding the underlying reasons for increased suicide rates in Japan. Second, due to the self-reported design of our study, not all the variables were based on the validated questionnaire. For example, COVID-19-related stigma, which was an important risk factor for SPD among young women, was collected via a single-item questionnaire we developed, resulting in a lack of detailed stigma profiles.[42] However, our survey used the items (K-6 scale), the reliability and validity of which have been tested and verified in prior studies.[31,43] Third, given that our data were collected using an internet-based survey, respondents may be different in meaningful ways than those who were not recruited. However, we used propensity-score weighted analysis to adjust for the demographic, socio-economic, and health-related differences between respondents of the present study and the Japanese general public.[33,34] Finally, our findings may not be generalizable to populations in other countries. Using large-scale, nationally representative survey data, we identified several important factors associated with SPD during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan’s general population. In particular, we found that female gender, younger age, income level, employment type, caregiving status, DV experience, and fear of COVID-19 were key risk factors for a higher rate of SPD. Among young women who presented higher suicide rates during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, experience of DV, fear of COVID-19, and COVID-19-related stigma were risk factors associated with SPD. Our findings highlight the importance of designing countermeasures based on the age and gender of the population to more effectively mitigate negative impacts on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  39 in total

1.  Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02

2.  The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan.

Authors:  Toshi A Furukawa; Norito Kawakami; Mari Saitoh; Yutaka Ono; Yoshibumi Nakane; Yosikazu Nakamura; Hisateru Tachimori; Noboru Iwata; Hidenori Uda; Hideyuki Nakane; Makoto Watanabe; Yoichi Naganuma; Yukihiro Hata; Masayo Kobayashi; Yuko Miyake; Tadashi Takeshima; Takehiko Kikkawa
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Fear of COVID-19 and the mental health consequences in America.

Authors:  Kevin M Fitzpatrick; Casey Harris; Grant Drawve
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2020-06-04

4.  Association Between Educational Attainment and Causes of Death Among White and Black US Adults, 2010-2017.

Authors:  Isaac Sasson; Mark D Hayward
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The shape of the relationship between income and self-assessed health: an international study.

Authors:  Johan P Mackenbach; Pekka Martikainen; Caspar W N Looman; Jetty A A Dalstra; Anton E Kunst; Eero Lahelma
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Staying Home, Staying Safe? A Short-Term Analysis of COVID-19 on Dallas Domestic Violence.

Authors:  Alex R Piquero; Jordan R Riddell; Stephen A Bishopp; Chelsey Narvey; Joan A Reid; Nicole Leeper Piquero
Journal:  Am J Crim Justice       Date:  2020-06-14

7.  COVID-19-related stigma and its association with mental health of health-care workers after quarantine in Vietnam.

Authors:  Cuong Do Duy; Vuong Minh Nong; An Ngo Van; Tra Doan Thu; Nga Do Thu; Tuan Nguyen Quang
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 12.145

8.  Heat-not-burn tobacco product use in Japan: its prevalence, predictors and perceived symptoms from exposure to secondhand heat-not-burn tobacco aerosol.

Authors:  Takahiro Tabuchi; Silvano Gallus; Tomohiro Shinozaki; Tomoki Nakaya; Naoki Kunugita; Brian Colwell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Psychosocial factors associated with postpartum psychological distress during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Luca Ostacoli; Stefano Cosma; Federica Bevilacqua; Paola Berchialla; Marialuisa Bovetti; Andrea Roberto Carosso; Francesca Malandrone; Sara Carletto; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Levels of Severity of Depressive Symptoms Among At-Risk Groups in the UK During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Eleonora Iob; Philipp Frank; Andrew Steptoe; Daisy Fancourt
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.