Yeli Wang1, Monica Palanichamy Kala2, Tazeen H Jafar1,3,4. 1. Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 2. Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 3. Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 4. Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has escalated the burden of psychological distress. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with psychological distress among the predominantly general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and World Health Organization COVID-19 databases (Dec 2019-15 July 2020). We included cross-sectional studies that reported factors associated with psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary outcomes were self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Random-effects models were used to pool odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42020186735). FINDINGS: We included 68 studies comprising 288,830 participants from 19 countries. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% CI: 28%-39%) and 30% (26%-36%). Women versus men (OR: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.29-1.71; I2 = 90.8%]), younger versus older (< versus ≥35 years) adults (1.20 [1.13-1.26]; I2 = 91.7%), living in rural versus urban areas (1.13 [1.00-1.29]; I2 = 82.9%), lower versus higher socioeconomic status (e.g. lower versus higher income: 1.45 [1.24-1.69; I2 = 82.3%]) were associated with higher anxiety odds. These factors (except for residential area) were also associated with higher depression odds. Furthermore, higher COVID-19 infection risk (suspected/confirmed cases, living in hard-hit areas, having pre-existing physical or mental conditions) and longer media exposure were associated with higher odds of anxiety and depression. INTERPRETATION: One in three adults in the predominantly general population have COVID-19 related psychological distress. Concerted efforts are urgently needed for interventions in high-risk populations to reduce urban-rural, socioeconomic and gender disparities in COVID-19 related psychological distress.
BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has escalated the burden of psychological distress. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with psychological distress among the predominantly general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and World Health Organization COVID-19 databases (Dec 2019-15 July 2020). We included cross-sectional studies that reported factors associated with psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary outcomes were self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Random-effects models were used to pool odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42020186735). FINDINGS: We included 68 studies comprising 288,830 participants from 19 countries. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% CI: 28%-39%) and 30% (26%-36%). Women versus men (OR: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.29-1.71; I2 = 90.8%]), younger versus older (< versus ≥35 years) adults (1.20 [1.13-1.26]; I2 = 91.7%), living in rural versus urban areas (1.13 [1.00-1.29]; I2 = 82.9%), lower versus higher socioeconomic status (e.g. lower versus higher income: 1.45 [1.24-1.69; I2 = 82.3%]) were associated with higher anxiety odds. These factors (except for residential area) were also associated with higher depression odds. Furthermore, higher COVID-19infection risk (suspected/confirmed cases, living in hard-hit areas, having pre-existing physical or mental conditions) and longer media exposure were associated with higher odds of anxiety and depression. INTERPRETATION: One in three adults in the predominantly general population have COVID-19 related psychological distress. Concerted efforts are urgently needed for interventions in high-risk populations to reduce urban-rural, socioeconomic and gender disparities in COVID-19 related psychological distress.
Authors: Jelena Vrublevska; Viktorija Perepjolkina; Kristine Martinsone; Jelena Kolesnikova; Ilona Krone; Daria Smirnova; Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Elmars Rancans Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-06-13
Authors: Giuseppe Francesco Papalia; Giorgia Petrucci; Fabrizio Russo; Luca Ambrosio; Gianluca Vadalà; Sergio Iavicoli; Rocco Papalia; Vincenzo Denaro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Els Nadort; Nadine Rijkers; Robbert W Schouten; Ellen K Hoogeveen; Willem J W Bos; Louis Jean Vleming; Michiel Westerman; Marcel Schouten; Marijke J E Dekker; Yves F C Smets; Prataap Chandie Shaw; Karima Farhat; Friedo W Dekker; Patricia van Oppen; Carl E H Siegert; Birit F P Broekman Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 4.620
Authors: Julio Cesar Tolentino; Ana Lucia Taboada Gjorup; Carolina Ribeiro Mello; Simone Gonçalves de Assis; André Casarsa Marques; Áureo do Carmo Filho; Hellen Rose Maia Salazar; Eelco van Duinkerken; Sergio Luis Schmidt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Melanie L Hill; Brandon Nichter; Peter J Na; Sonya B Norman; Leslie A Morland; John H Krystal; Robert H Pietrzak Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 7.723