Literature DB >> 18763695

The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan.

Toshi A Furukawa1, Norito Kawakami, Mari Saitoh, Yutaka Ono, Yoshibumi Nakane, Yosikazu Nakamura, Hisateru Tachimori, Noboru Iwata, Hidenori Uda, Hideyuki Nakane, Makoto Watanabe, Yoichi Naganuma, Yukihiro Hata, Masayo Kobayashi, Yuko Miyake, Tadashi Takeshima, Takehiko Kikkawa.   

Abstract

Two new screening scales for psychological distress, the K6 and K10, have been developed using the item response theory and shown to outperform existing screeners in English. We developed their Japanese versions using the standard back-translaton method and included them in the World Mental Health Survey Japan (WMH-J), which is a psychiatric epidemiologic study conducted in seven communities across Japan with 2436 participants. The WMH-J used the WMH Survey Initiative version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) to assess the 30-day Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders--Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Performance of the two screening scales in detecting DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders, as assessed by the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), was excellent, with values as high as 0.94 (95% confidence interval = 0.88 to 0.99) for K6 and 0.94 (0.88 to 0.995) for K10. Stratum-specific likelihood ratios (SSLRs), which express screening test characteristics and can be used to produce individual-level predicted probabilities of being a case from screening scale scores and pretest probabilities in other samples, were strikingly similar between the Japanese and the original versions. The Japanese versions of the K6 and K10 thus demonstrated screening performances essentially equivalent to those of the original English versions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18763695      PMCID: PMC6878390          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  15 in total

1.  Letter: Nomogram for Bayes theorem.

Authors:  T J Fagan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02

3.  A twenty-two item screening score of psychiatric symptoms indicating impairment.

Authors:  T S LANGNER
Journal:  J Health Hum Behav       Date:  1962

4.  Factor structure and interpretation of the K10.

Authors:  Robert T Brooks; John Beard; Zachary Steel
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2006-03

5.  Stratum-specific likelihood ratios of two versions of the general health questionnaire.

Authors:  T A Furukawa; D P Goldberg; S Rabe-Hesketh; T B Ustün
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 6.  Integrating stratum-specific likelihood ratios with the analysis of ROC curves.

Authors:  J C Peirce; R G Cornell
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health surveys.

Authors:  Josep Maria Haro; Saena Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Traolach S Brugha; Giovanni de Girolamo; Margaret E Guyer; Robert Jin; Jean Pierre Lepine; Fausto Mazzi; Blanca Reneses; Gemma Vilagut; Nancy A Sampson; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  Why GHQ threshold varies from one place to another.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; T Oldehinkel; J Ormel
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.

Authors:  Koen Demyttenaere; Ronny Bruffaerts; Jose Posada-Villa; Isabelle Gasquet; Viviane Kovess; Jean Pierre Lepine; Matthias C Angermeyer; Sebastian Bernert; Giovanni de Girolamo; Pierluigi Morosini; Gabriella Polidori; Takehiko Kikkawa; Norito Kawakami; Yutaka Ono; Tadashi Takeshima; Hidenori Uda; Elie G Karam; John A Fayyad; Aimee N Karam; Zeina N Mneimneh; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Guilherme Borges; Carmen Lara; Ron de Graaf; Johan Ormel; Oye Gureje; Yucun Shen; Yueqin Huang; Mingyuan Zhang; Jordi Alonso; Josep Maria Haro; Gemma Vilagut; Evelyn J Bromet; Semyon Gluzman; Charles Webb; Ronald C Kessler; Kathleen R Merikangas; James C Anthony; Michael R Von Korff; Philip S Wang; Traolach S Brugha; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Sing Lee; Steven Heeringa; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Alan M Zaslavsky; T Bedirhan Ustun; Somnath Chatterji
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  351 in total

1.  Organizational justice and psychological distress among permanent and non-permanent employees in Japan: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Akiomi Inoue; Norito Kawakami; Kanami Tsuno; Kimiko Tomioka; Mayuko Nakanishi
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-06

2.  Marital Adjustment and Psychological Distress in Japan.

Authors:  Angela Li; Briana L Robustelli; Mark A Whisman
Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat       Date:  2015-08-14

3.  Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers.

Authors:  Akiomi Inoue; Norito Kawakami; Masao Ishizaki; Akihito Shimazu; Masao Tsuchiya; Masaji Tabata; Miki Akiyama; Akiko Kitazume; Mitsuyo Kuroda
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Gender differences in association between psychological distress and detailed living arrangements among Japanese older adults, aged 65-74 years.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kikuchi; Tomoko Takamiya; Yuko Odagiri; Yumiko Ohya; Tomoki Nakaya; Teruichi Shimomitsu; Shigeru Inoue
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Toward a cancer-specific model of psychological distress: population data from the 2003-2005 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  Natalie C Kaiser; Narineh Hartoonian; Jason E Owen
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Scale development of health status for secondary data analysis using a nationally representative survey.

Authors:  Akihiro Nishi; Haruko Noguchi; Hideki Hashimoto; Nanako Tamiya
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.674

7.  How is an informal caregiver's psychological distress associated with prolonged caregiving? Evidence from a six-wave panel survey in Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Oshio
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Organizational Justice and Physiological Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors in Japanese Employees: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Akiomi Inoue; Norito Kawakami; Hisashi Eguchi; Koichi Miyaki; Akizumi Tsutsumi
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2015-12

9.  Mental Health Service Use and Perceived Unmet Needs for Mental Health Care in Asian Americans.

Authors:  Yuri Jang; Hyunwoo Yoon; Nan Sook Park; Min-Kyoung Rhee; David A Chiriboga
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2018-10-24

10.  Measurement Equivalence of the K6 Scale: The Effects of Race/Ethnicity and Language.

Authors:  Giyeon Kim; Jamie DeCoster; Ami N Bryant; Katy L Ford
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2015-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.