Literature DB >> 33678445

A Deep Learning Tool for Automated Radiographic Measurement of Acetabular Component Inclination and Version After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Pouria Rouzrokh1, Cody C Wyles2, Kenneth A Philbrick1, Taghi Ramazanian2, Alexander D Weston3, Jason C Cai1, Michael J Taunton2, David G Lewallen4, Daniel J Berry4, Bradley J Erickson1, Hilal Maradit Kremers2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate acetabular component angular position is believed to increase the risk of hip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. However, manual measurement of these angles is time consuming and prone to interobserver variability. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning tool to automate the measurement of acetabular component angles on postoperative radiographs.
METHODS: Two cohorts of 600 anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and 600 cross-table lateral hip postoperative radiographs were used to develop deep learning models to segment the acetabular component and the ischial tuberosities. Cohorts were manually annotated, augmented, and randomly split to train-validation-test data sets on an 8:1:1 basis. Two U-Net convolutional neural network models (one for AP and one for cross-table lateral radiographs) were trained for 50 epochs. Image processing was then deployed to measure the acetabular component angles on the predicted masks for anatomical landmarks. Performance of the tool was tested on 80 AP and 80 cross-table lateral radiographs.
RESULTS: The convolutional neural network models achieved a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.878 and 0.903 on AP and cross-table lateral test data sets, respectively. The mean difference between human-level and machine-level measurements was 1.35° (σ = 1.07°) and 1.39° (σ = 1.27°) for the inclination and anteversion angles, respectively. Differences of 5⁰ or more between human-level and machine-level measurements were observed in less than 2.5% of cases.
CONCLUSION: We developed a highly accurate deep learning tool to automate the measurement of angular position of acetabular components for use in both clinical and research settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetabular component angle; anteversion angle; artificial intelligence; deep learning; inclination angle; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33678445      PMCID: PMC8197739          DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.435


  17 in total

1.  Measuring acetabular component position on lateral radiographs - ischio-lateral method.

Authors:  Nicholas Pulos; John V Tiberi Iii; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2011

2.  The functional and financial impact of isolated and recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M P Abdel; M B Cross; A T Yasen; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  A precise method for determining acetabular component anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael P Murphy; Cameron J Killen; Steven J Ralles; Nicholas M Brown; William J Hopkinson; Karen Wu
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Performance and function of a desktop viewer at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale.

Authors:  W G Eversman; W Pavlicek; B Zavalkovskiy; B J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component.

Authors:  R Biedermann; A Tonin; M Krismer; F Rachbauer; G Eibl; B Stöckl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

7.  Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?

Authors:  B Craiovan; M Weber; M Worlicek; M Schneider; H R Springorum; F Zeman; J Grifka; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2016-04-19

8.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Y Woo; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  RIL-Contour: a Medical Imaging Dataset Annotation Tool for and with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Kenneth A Philbrick; Alexander D Weston; Zeynettin Akkus; Timothy L Kline; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Tomas Sakinis; Petro Kostandy; Arunnit Boonrod; Atefeh Zeinoddini; Naoki Takahashi; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Superior accuracy of model-based radiostereometric analysis for measurement of polyethylene wear: A phantom study.

Authors:  M Stilling; S Kold; S de Raedt; N T Andersen; O Rahbek; K Søballe
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  6 in total

1.  Deep Learning for Radiographic Measurement of Femoral Component Subsidence Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pouria Rouzrokh; Cody C Wyles; Shyam J Kurian; Taghi Ramazanian; Jason C Cai; Qiao Huang; Kuan Zhang; Michael J Taunton; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Artificial intelligence for distinguishment of hammering sound in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Homma; Shun Ito; Xu Zhuang; Tomonori Baba; Kazutoshi Fujibayashi; Kazuo Kaneko; Yu Nishiyama; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning: an introduction for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  R Kyle Martin; Christophe Ley; Ayoosh Pareek; Andreas Groll; Thomas Tischer; Romain Seil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence in arthroplasty.

Authors:  Glen Purnomo; Seng-Jin Yeo; Ming Han Lincoln Liow
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-11-02

5.  Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Preoperative Planning System for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Xingyu Liu; Yiou Wang; Ruichen Ma; Shibai Zhu; Shanni Li; Songlin Li; Xiying Dong; Hairui Li; Guangzhi Wang; Yaojiong Wu; Yiling Zhang; Guixing Qiu; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years?

Authors:  Maximilian Hinz; Christoph Lutter; Ralf Mueller-Rath; Philipp Niemeyer; Oliver Miltner; Thomas Tischer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.114

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.