Literature DB >> 7142237

Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

R Y Woo, B F Morrey.   

Abstract

During the ten-year period ending in 1978, 10,500 conventional total hip arthroplasties were performed at the Mayo Clinic; dislocation developed after 331 (3.2 per cent) of these procedures. Cross correlations of the data were performed using multivariate analysis. This analysis showed that previous surgery on the hip was the most significant of the factors predisposing to dislocation, the incidence doubling from 2.4 per cent (in hips without previous surgery) to 4.8 per cent (in hips with previous surgery) (p less than 0.001). The dislocation rate was 2.3 per cent after an anterolateral approach and 5.8 per cent after a posterior approach (p less than 0.01). The size of the head of the femoral component was not a strongly influential factor. The incidence of dislocation was 17.6 per cent in the hips that had osteotomy and avulsion of the greater trochanter, compared with 2.8 per cent in those in which the trochanteric osteotomy united (p less than 0.001). Reoperation for instability of the hip was performed in a third of the patients, but in 31 per cent of the patients whose hip was reoperated on the instability persisted after the revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7142237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  213 in total

1.  Influence of self-reported limb length discrepancy on function and satisfaction 6 years after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Maura D Iversen; Nidhi Chudasama; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.381

2.  Is metal-on-metal squeaking related to acetabular angle of inclination?

Authors:  Thomas Bernasek; David Fisher; David Dalury; Melissa Levering; Kirk Dimitris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Implementing capsule representation in a total hip dislocation finite element model.

Authors:  Kristofer J Stewart; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2004

4.  Differences between the wear couples metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic in the stability against dislocation of total hip replacement.

Authors:  Rainer Bader; Erwin Steinhauser; Susanne Zimmermann; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Roger Scholz; Raymonde Busch
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Do joint registries report true rates of hip dislocation?

Authors:  Peter A Devane; Philip J Wraighte; David C G Ong; J Geoffrey Horne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; David J Biau; Denis Huten; Thierry Musset; François Gaucher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Michael D Skeels; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Orlando J Franchi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases.

Authors:  Claude Vielpeau; Benoit Lebel; Ludovic Ardouin; Gilles Burdin; Christine Lautridou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Ha; Jeong Joon Yoo; Young-Kyun Lee; Jin Young Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches?

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; S M Javad Mortazavi; Justin Brothers; Javad Parvizi; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.