Literature DB >> 22035491

Measuring acetabular component position on lateral radiographs - ischio-lateral method.

Nicholas Pulos1, John V Tiberi Iii, Thomas P Schmalzried.   

Abstract

The standard method for the evaluation of arthritis and postoperative assessment of arthroplasty treatment is observation and measurement from plain films, using the flm edge for orientation. A more recent employment of an anatomical landmark, the ischial tuberosity, has come into use as orientation for evaluation and is called the ischio-lateral method. In this study, the use of this method was evaluated as a first report to the literature on acetabular component measurement using a skeletal reference with lateral radiographs. Postoperative radiographs of 52 hips, with at least three true lateral radiographs taken at different time periods, were analyzed. Component position was measured with the historical method (using the flm edge for orientation) and with the new method using the ischio-lateral method. The mean standard deviation (SD) for the historical approach was 3.7° and for the ischio-lateral method, 2.2° (p < 0.001). With the historical method, 19 (36.5%) hips had a SD greater than ± 4°, compared to six hips (11.5%) with the ischio-lateral method. By using a skeletal reference, the ischio-lateral method provides a more consistent measurement of acetabular component position. The high intra-class correlation coefficients for both intra- and inter-observer reliability indicate that the angle measured with this simple method, which employs no further technology, increased time, or cost, is consistent and reproducible for multiple observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22035491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis        ISSN: 1936-9719


  7 in total

1.  Anteroposterior Radiographs Are More Accurate than Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Acetabular Anteversion Assessment: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Alexander S McLawhorn; Kaitlin M Carroll; Benjamin A McArthur; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  A more reliable method to assess acetabular component position.

Authors:  John V Tiberi; Nicholas Pulos; Michael Kertzner; Thomas P Schmalzried; Thomas P Schmlazried
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Radiographic assessment of the cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  Jing-Xin Zhao; Xiu-Yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Ruo-Xiu Xiao; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

4.  Assessment of Acetabular Component Anteversion after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Anteroposterior and Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs with Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Tarun Goyal; Souvik Paul; Arghya Kundu Choudhury; Tushar Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-08-17

5.  Computer-Assisted Navigation for Complex Revision of Unstable Total Hip Replacement in a Patient With Post-traumatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Kelsey A Rankin; Logan Petit; Adam Nasreddine; Phil Minotti; Michael Leslie; Daniel H Wiznia
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-10

6.  Does femoral neck to cup impingement affect metal ion levels in hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Michel J Le Duff; Alicia J Johnson; Andrew J Wassef; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A Deep Learning Tool for Automated Radiographic Measurement of Acetabular Component Inclination and Version After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pouria Rouzrokh; Cody C Wyles; Kenneth A Philbrick; Taghi Ramazanian; Alexander D Weston; Jason C Cai; Michael J Taunton; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry; Bradley J Erickson; Hilal Maradit Kremers
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.435

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.