Literature DB >> 10847386

Performance and function of a desktop viewer at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale.

W G Eversman1, W Pavlicek, B Zavalkovskiy, B J Erickson.   

Abstract

A clinical viewing system was integrated with the Mayo Clinic Scottsdale picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for providing images and the report as part of the electronic medical record (EMR). Key attributes of the viewer include a single user log-on, an integrated patient centric EMR image access for all ordered examinations, prefetching of the most recent prior examination of the same modality, and the ability to provide comparison of current and past exams at the same time on the display. Other functions included preset windows, measurement tools, and multiformat display. Images for the prior 12 months are stored on the clinical server and are viewable in less than a second. Images available on the desktop include all computed radiography (CR), chest, magnetic resonance images (MRI), computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (U/S), nuclear, angiographic, gastrointestinal (GI) digital spots, and portable C-arm digital spots. Ad hoc queries of examinations from PACS are possible for those patients whose image may not be on the clinical server, but whose images reside on the PACS archive (10TB). Clinician satisfaction was reported to be high, especially for those staff heavily dependent on timely access to images, as well as those having heavy film usage. The desktop viewer is used for resident access to images. It is also useful for teaching conferences with large-screen projection without film. We report on the measurements of functionality, reliability, and speed of image display with this application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10847386      PMCID: PMC3453262          DOI: 10.1007/bf03167648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  12 in total

1.  Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: comparison with cathode ray tube displays.

Authors:  W Pavlicek; J M Owen; M B Peter
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Performance and function of a high-speed multiple star topology image management system at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale.

Authors:  W Pavlicek; B Zavalkovskiy; W G Eversman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluation of commercial PC-based DICOM image viewer.

Authors:  R Honea; C W McCluggage; B Parker; D O'Neall; K A Shook
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application.

Authors:  B J Erickson; W J Ryan; D G Gehring; C Beebe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Wavelet compression of medical images.

Authors:  B J Erickson; A Manduca; P Palisson; K R Persons; F Earnest; V Savcenko; N J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A comparison between digital images viewed on a picture archiving and communication system diagnostic workstation and on a PC-based remote viewing system by emergency physicians.

Authors:  A Parasyn; R M Hanson; J K Peat; M De Silva
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  The effect of 10 : 1 compression and soft copy interpretation on the chest radiographs of premature neonates with reference to their possible application in teleradiology.

Authors:  S B Parisi; G T Mogel; R Dominguez; H Dao; T J Cramer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Subtle pulmonary abnormalities: detection on monitors with varying spatial resolutions and maximum luminance levels compared with detection on storage phosphor radiographic hard copies.

Authors:  D Otto; T M Bernhardt; U Rapp-Bernhardt; K Ludwig; A Kästner; U B Liehr; W Döhring
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Image display for clinicians on medical record workstations.

Authors:  B J Erickson; W J Ryan; D G Gehring; C Beebe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs.

Authors:  B J Erickson; A Manduca; K R Persons; F Earnest; T E Hartman; G F Harms; L R Brown
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  8 in total

1.  Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: comparison with cathode ray tube displays.

Authors:  W Pavlicek; J M Owen; M B Peter
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Functional requirements of a desktop clinical image display application.

Authors:  B J Erickson; W J Ryan; D G Gehring
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Irreversible compression of medical images.

Authors:  Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Evaluation of radiological workstations and web-browser-based image distribution clients for a PACS project in hands-on workshops.

Authors:  Thomas Boehm; Oliver Handgraetinger; Juergen Link; Ricardo Ploner; Daniel R Voellmy; Borut Marincek; Simon Wildermuth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  PACS bypass: a semi-automated routing solution to enable filmless operations when PACS fails.

Authors:  Steve G Langer; Chris P Wood; Naveen S Murthy; Todd L French; Mike Rubin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Problem-oriented prefetching for an integrated clinical imaging workstation.

Authors:  A A Bui; M F McNitt-Gray; J G Goldin; A F Cardenas; D R Aberle
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist.

Authors:  Bart M Demaerschalk; Bentley J Bobrow; Rema Raman; Karin Ernstrom; Joseph M Hoxworth; Ameet C Patel; Terri-Ellen J Kiernan; Maria I Aguilar; Timothy J Ingall; David W Dodick; Brett C Meyer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  A Deep Learning Tool for Automated Radiographic Measurement of Acetabular Component Inclination and Version After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pouria Rouzrokh; Cody C Wyles; Kenneth A Philbrick; Taghi Ramazanian; Alexander D Weston; Jason C Cai; Michael J Taunton; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry; Bradley J Erickson; Hilal Maradit Kremers
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.435

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.