Literature DB >> 34751676

Cutting Through the Noise: Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy and Individual Differences in Speech Understanding Among Listeners With Normal Audiograms.

Mishaela DiNino1, Lori L Holt, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

Following a conversation in a crowded restaurant or at a lively party poses immense perceptual challenges for some individuals with normal hearing thresholds. A number of studies have investigated whether noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy (CS; damage to the synapses between cochlear hair cells and the auditory nerve following noise exposure that does not permanently elevate hearing thresholds) contributes to this difficulty. A few studies have observed correlations between proxies of noise-induced CS and speech perception in difficult listening conditions, but many have found no evidence of a relationship. To understand these mixed results, we reviewed previous studies that have examined noise-induced CS and performance on speech perception tasks in adverse listening conditions in adults with normal or near-normal hearing thresholds. Our review suggests that superficially similar speech perception paradigms used in previous investigations actually placed very different demands on sensory, perceptual, and cognitive processing. Speech perception tests that use low signal-to-noise ratios and maximize the importance of fine sensory details- specifically by using test stimuli for which lexical, syntactic, and semantic cues do not contribute to performance-are more likely to show a relationship to estimated CS levels. Thus, the current controversy as to whether or not noise-induced CS contributes to individual differences in speech perception under challenging listening conditions may be due in part to the fact that many of the speech perception tasks used in past studies are relatively insensitive to CS-induced deficits.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34751676      PMCID: PMC8712363          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.562


  84 in total

1.  Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Mead C Killion; Patricia A Niquette; Gail I Gudmundsen; Lawrence J Revit; Shilpi Banerjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Subcategories of patients with King-Kopetzky syndrome.

Authors:  F Zhao; D Stephens
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-08

4.  Dynamics of cochlear synaptopathy after acoustic overexposure.

Authors:  Leslie D Liberman; Jun Suzuki; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-13

5.  Evidence of "hidden hearing loss" following noise exposures that produce robust TTS and ABR wave-I amplitude reductions.

Authors:  Edward Lobarinas; Christopher Spankovich; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Translational issues in cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Ann E Hickox; Erik Larsen; Michael G Heinz; Leslie Shinobu; Jonathon P Whitton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1981-12

8.  Speech predictability can hinder communication in difficult listening conditions.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-26

Review 9.  Effects of Recreational Noise on Threshold and Suprathreshold Measures of Auditory Function.

Authors:  Angela N C Fulbright; Colleen G Le Prell; Scott K Griffiths; Edward Lobarinas
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-10-10

10.  Loud Music Exposure and Cochlear Synaptopathy in Young Adults: Isolated Auditory Brainstem Response Effects but No Perceptual Consequences.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Relative and Combined Effects of Noise Exposure and Aging on Auditory Peripheral Neural Deafferentation: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Adnan M Shehabi; Garreth Prendergast; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.702

2.  No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Alexis Pinsonnault-Skvarenina; Karina Moïn-Darbari; Wulan Zhao; Meibian Zhang; Wei Qiu; Adrian Fuente
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.152

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.