Literature DB >> 33078291

Effects of Kainic Acid-Induced Auditory Nerve Damage on Envelope-Following Responses in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

John L Wilson1,2,3, Kristina S Abrams3, Kenneth S Henry4,5,6.   

Abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss is a prevalent problem that adversely impacts quality of life by compromising interpersonal communication. While hair cell damage is readily detectable with the clinical audiogram, this traditional diagnostic tool appears inadequate to detect lost afferent connections between inner hair cells and auditory nerve (AN) fibers, known as cochlear synaptopathy. The envelope-following response (EFR) is a scalp-recorded response to amplitude modulation, a critical acoustic feature of speech. Because EFRs can have greater amplitude than wave I of the auditory brainstem response (ABR; i.e., the AN-generated component) in humans, the EFR may provide a more sensitive way to detect cochlear synaptopathy. We explored the effects of kainate- (kainic acid) induced excitotoxic AN injury on EFRs and ABRs in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus), a parakeet species used in studies of complex sound discrimination. Kainate reduced ABR wave I by 65-75 % across animals while leaving otoacoustic emissions unaffected or mildly enhanced, consistent with substantial and selective AN synaptic loss. Compared to wave I loss, EFRs showed similar or greater percent reduction following kainate for amplitude-modulation frequencies from 380 to 940 Hz and slightly less reduction from 80 to 120 Hz. In contrast, forebrain-generated middle latency responses showed no consistent change post-kainate, potentially due to elevated "central gain" in the time period following AN damage. EFR reduction in all modulation frequency ranges was highly correlated with wave I reduction, though within-animal effect sizes were greater for higher modulation frequencies. These results suggest that even low-frequency EFRs generated primarily by central auditory nuclei might provide a useful noninvasive tool for detecting synaptic injury clinically.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory brainstem response; cochlear synaptopathy; group delay; hidden hearing loss; middle latency response; sinusoidal amplitude modulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33078291      PMCID: PMC7822981          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00776-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  53 in total

1.  Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  M D Valero; J A Burton; S N Hauser; T A Hackett; R Ramachandran; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.

Authors:  Glenis R Long; Carrick L Talmadge; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Dynamics of cochlear synaptopathy after acoustic overexposure.

Authors:  Leslie D Liberman; Jun Suzuki; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-13

4.  Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model.

Authors:  Roland Schaette; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Jérôme Bourien; Yong Tang; Charlène Batrel; Antoine Huet; Marc Lenoir; Sabine Ladrech; Gilles Desmadryl; Régis Nouvian; Jean-Luc Puel; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Excitotoxic effect of kainic acid on chicken otoacoustic emissions and cochlear potentials.

Authors:  H Sun; R J Salvi; D L Ding; D E Hashino; M Shero; X Y Zheng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Robert J Dooling; Otto Gleich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Kainic acid: an evaluation of its action on cochlear potentials.

Authors:  S C Bledsoe; R P Bobbin; D M Chihal
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms I: Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Garreth Prendergast; Hannah Guest; Kevin J Munro; Karolina Kluk; Agnès Léger; Deborah A Hall; Michael G Heinz; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Inner Hair Cell Loss Disrupts Hearing and Cochlear Function Leading to Sensory Deprivation and Enhanced Central Auditory Gain.

Authors:  Richard Salvi; Wei Sun; Dalian Ding; Guang-Di Chen; Edward Lobarinas; Jian Wang; Kelly Radziwon; Benjamin D Auerbach
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Animal models of hidden hearing loss: Does auditory-nerve-fiber loss cause real-world listening difficulties?

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.314

2.  Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Anita M Mepani; Sarah Verhulst; Kenneth E Hancock; Markus Garrett; Viacheslav Vasilkov; Kara Bennett; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.714

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.