Literature DB >> 34346254

Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Investigational Medicines for the Inner Ear: Previous Trial Outcomes Should Inform Future Trial Design.

Colleen G Le Prell1.   

Abstract

Significance: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is an important public health issue resulting in decreased quality of life for affected individuals, and significant costs to employers and governmental agencies. Recent Advances: Advances in the mechanistic understanding of NIHL have prompted a growing number of proposed, in-progress, and completed clinical trials for possible protections against NIHL via antioxidants and other drug agents. Thirty-one clinical trials evaluating prevention of either temporary or permanent NIHL were identified and are reviewed. Critical Issues: This review revealed little consistency in the noise-exposed populations in which drugs are evaluated or the primary outcomes used to measure NIHL prevention. Changes in pure-tone thresholds were the most common primary outcomes; specific threshold metrics included both average hearing loss and incidence of significant hearing loss. Changes in otoacoustic emission (OAE) amplitude were relatively common secondary outcomes. Extended high-frequency (EHF) hearing and speech-in-noise perception are commonly adversely affected by noise exposure but are not consistently included in clinical trials assessing prevention of NIHL. Future Directions: Multiple criteria are available for monitoring NIHL, but the specific criterion to be used to define clinically significant otoprotection remains a topic of discussion. Audiogram-based primary outcome measures can be combined with secondary outcomes, including OAE amplitude, EHF hearing, speech-in-noise testing, tinnitus surveys, and patient-reported outcomes. Standardization of test protocols for the above primary and secondary outcomes, and associated reporting criterion for each, would facilitate clinical trial design and comparison of results across investigational drug agents. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 36, 1171-1202.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NIHL; clinical trial; noise-induced hearing loss; otoprotection; primary endpoint

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34346254      PMCID: PMC9221155          DOI: 10.1089/ars.2021.0166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal        ISSN: 1523-0864            Impact factor:   7.468


  162 in total

1.  The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Crystal S Carnell; Amber L Cleghorn
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.

Authors:  Theresa Y Schulz
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

3.  Clinical trials, ototoxicity grading scales and the audiologist's role in therapeutic decision making.

Authors:  Kelly A King; Carmen C Brewer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 4.  Monitoring neonates for ototoxicity.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Alison Kemph; Anne Marie Tharpe; Joern-Hendrik Weitkamp; Cynthia McEvoy; Peter S Steyger
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Cardiovascular conditions, hearing difficulty, and occupational noise exposure within US industries and occupations.

Authors:  Ellen Kerns; Elizabeth A Masterson; Christa L Themann; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Tinnitus Functional Index: Development, validation, outcomes research, and clinical application.

Authors:  James A Henry; Susan Griest; Emily Thielman; Garnett McMillan; Christine Kaelin; Kathleen F Carlson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Audiologic characteristics in a sample of recently-separated military Veterans: The Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study (NOISE Study).

Authors:  J S Gordon; S E Griest; E J Thielman; K F Carlson; W J Helt; M S Lewis; C Blankenship; D Austin; S M Theodoroff; J A Henry
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Van Summers; Matthew J Makashay; Sarah M Theodoroff; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Modeling individual noise-induced hearing loss risk with proxy measurements of external-ear amplification.

Authors:  Sarah K Grinn; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Supra-threshold auditory brainstem response amplitudes in humans: Test-retest reliability, electrode montage and noise exposure.

Authors:  Garreth Prendergast; Wenhe Tu; Hannah Guest; Rebecca E Millman; Karolina Kluk; Samuel Couth; Kevin J Munro; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The audiogram: Detection of pure-tone stimuli in ototoxicity monitoring and assessments of investigational medicines for the inner ear.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Carmen C Brewer; Kathleen C M Campbell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 2.  Investigational Medicinal Products for the Inner Ear: Review of Clinical Trial Characteristics in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 1.245

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.