Literature DB >> 33637700

Improved protein structure refinement guided by deep learning based accuracy estimation.

Naozumi Hiranuma1,2, Hahnbeom Park1, Minkyung Baek1, Ivan Anishchenko1, Justas Dauparas1, David Baker3,4.   

Abstract

We develop a deep learning framework (DeepAccNet) that estimates per-residue accuracy and residue-residue distance signed error in protein models and uses these predictions to guide Rosetta protein structure refinement. The network uses 3D convolutions to evaluate local atomic environments followed by 2D convolutions to provide their global contexts and outperforms other methods that similarly predict the accuracy of protein structure models. Overall accuracy predictions for X-ray and cryoEM structures in the PDB correlate with their resolution, and the network should be broadly useful for assessing the accuracy of both predicted structure models and experimentally determined structures and identifying specific regions likely to be in error. Incorporation of the accuracy predictions at multiple stages in the Rosetta refinement protocol considerably increased the accuracy of the resulting protein structure models, illustrating how deep learning can improve search for global energy minima of biomolecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33637700      PMCID: PMC7910447          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21511-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  31 in total

1.  Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Valerio Mariani; Florian Kiefer; Tobias Schmidt; Juergen Haas; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Distance-based protein folding powered by deep learning.

Authors:  Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Experimental accuracy in protein structure refinement via molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  VoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-03-24

5.  Deep convolutional networks for quality assessment of protein folds.

Authors:  Georgy Derevyanko; Sergei Grudinin; Yoshua Bengio; Guillaume Lamoureux
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Ivan Anishchenko; Hahnbeom Park; Zhenling Peng; Sergey Ovchinnikov; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning.

Authors:  Andrew W Senior; Richard Evans; John Jumper; James Kirkpatrick; Laurent Sifre; Tim Green; Chongli Qin; Augustin Žídek; Alexander W R Nelson; Alex Bridgland; Hugo Penedones; Stig Petersen; Karen Simonyan; Steve Crossan; Pushmeet Kohli; David T Jones; David Silver; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Computational protein structure refinement: Almost there, yet still so far to go.

Authors:  Michael Feig
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-28

9.  ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms.

Authors:  Karolis Uziela; Nanjiang Shu; Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  A guide to machine learning for biologists.

Authors:  Joe G Greener; Shaun M Kandathil; Lewis Moffat; David T Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide-protein docking.

Authors:  Tomer Tsaban; Julia K Varga; Orly Avraham; Ziv Ben-Aharon; Alisa Khramushin; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP14: Old and new challenges.

Authors:  Sohee Kwon; Jonghun Won; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-08-05

4.  Evaluation of model refinement in CASP14.

Authors:  Adam J Simpkin; Filomeno Sánchez Rodríguez; Shahram Mesdaghi; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Daniel J Rigden
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-07-29

5.  Physics-based protein structure refinement in the era of artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Giacomo Janson; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-06-29

6.  Improved Protein Model Quality Assessment By Integrating Sequential And Pairwise Features Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Jing; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 7.  The Road Less Traveled? Unconventional Protein Secretion at Parasite-Host Interfaces.

Authors:  Erina A Balmer; Carmen Faso
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-24

8.  Protein Structure Refinement Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization with Decomposition Strategy.

Authors:  Cheng-Peng Zhou; Di Wang; Xiaoyong Pan; Hong-Bin Shen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Protein model accuracy estimation empowered by deep learning and inter-residue distance prediction in CASP14.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Jian Liu; Zhiye Guo; Tianqi Wu; Jie Hou; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Improved Sampling Strategies for Protein Model Refinement Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Collin F Arbour; Giacomo Janson; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.