Literature DB >> 30613211

Computational protein structure refinement: Almost there, yet still so far to go.

Michael Feig1.   

Abstract

Protein structures are essential in modern biology yet experimental methods are far from being able to catch up with the rapid increase in available genomic data. Computational protein structure prediction methods aim to fill the gap while the role of protein structure refinement is to take approximate initial template-based models and bring them closer to the true native structure. Current methods for computational structure refinement rely on molecular dynamics simulations, related sampling methods, or iterative structure optimization protocols. The best methods are able to achieve moderate degrees of refinement but consistent refinement that can reach near-experimental accuracy remains elusive. Key issues revolve around the accuracy of the energy function, the inability to reliably rank multiple models, and the use of restraints that keep sampling close to the native state but also limit the degree of possible refinement. A different aspect is the question of what exactly the target of high-resolution refinement should be as experimental structures are affected by experimental conditions and different biological questions require varying levels of accuracy. While improvement of the global protein structure is a difficult problem, high-resolution refinement methods that improves local structural quality such as favorable stereochemistry and the avoidance of atomic clashes are much more successful.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 30613211      PMCID: PMC6319934          DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci        ISSN: 1759-0884


  19 in total

1.  Computer Modeling of N-Acetylglutamate Synthase: From Primary Structure to Elemental Stages of Catalysis.

Authors:  I V Polyakov; A E Kniga; B L Grigorenko; A V Nemukhin; S D Varfolomeev
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 0.788

2.  Ligand-Binding-Site Structure Refinement Using Molecular Dynamics with Restraints Derived from Predicted Binding Site Templates.

Authors:  Hugo Guterres; Hui Sun Lee; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Computational Methods for the Elucidation of Protein Structure and Interactions.

Authors:  Nicholas S Edmunds; Liam J McGuffin
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Driven to near-experimental accuracy by refinement via molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Collin F Arbour; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-06-24

5.  High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-11-15

6.  Discrimination of Native-like States of Membrane Proteins with Implicit Membrane-based Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Bercem Dutagaci; Kitiyaporn Wittayanarakul; Takaharu Mori; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Improved 3-D Protein Structure Predictions using Deep ResNet Model.

Authors:  S Geethu; E R Vimina
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 2.371

8.  Targeting Bromodomain and Extraterminal Proteins for Drug Discovery: From Current Progress to Technological Development.

Authors:  Pan Tang; Jifa Zhang; Jie Liu; Cheng-Ming Chiang; Liang Ouyang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Physics-based protein structure refinement in the era of artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Giacomo Janson; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-06-29

10.  Improved Sampling Strategies for Protein Model Refinement Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Collin F Arbour; Giacomo Janson; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.