Literature DB >> 34156124

Physics-based protein structure refinement in the era of artificial intelligence.

Lim Heo1, Giacomo Janson1, Michael Feig1.   

Abstract

Protein structure refinement is the last step in protein structure prediction pipelines. Physics-based refinement via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations has made significant progress during recent years. During CASP14, we tested a new refinement protocol based on an improved sampling strategy via MD simulations. MD simulations were carried out at an elevated temperature (360 K). An optimized use of biasing restraints and the use of multiple starting models led to enhanced sampling. The new protocol generally improved the model quality. In comparison with our previous protocols, the CASP14 protocol showed clear improvements. Our approach was successful with most initial models, many based on deep learning methods. However, we found that our approach was not able to refine machine-learning models from the AlphaFold2 group, often decreasing already high initial qualities. To better understand the role of refinement given new types of models based on machine-learning, a detailed analysis via MD simulations and Markov state modeling is presented here. We continue to find that MD-based refinement has the potential to improve AI predictions. We also identified several practical issues that make it difficult to realize that potential. Increasingly important is the consideration of inter-domain and oligomeric contacts in simulations; the presence of large kinetic barriers in refinement pathways also continues to present challenges. Finally, we provide a perspective on how physics-based refinement could continue to play a role in the future for improving initial predictions based on machine learning-based methods.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP; Markov state models; conformational sampling; machine learning; molecular dynamics simulation; protein structure prediction; structure refinement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34156124      PMCID: PMC8616793          DOI: 10.1002/prot.26161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  63 in total

1.  Distance-based protein folding powered by deep learning.

Authors:  Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Determination of protein structural ensembles using cryo-electron microscopy.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bonomi; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) I: bond perception and atom typing.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; A D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 4.  Markov State Models: From an Art to a Science.

Authors:  Brooke E Husic; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Ivan Anishchenko; Hahnbeom Park; Zhenling Peng; Sergey Ovchinnikov; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning.

Authors:  Andrew W Senior; Richard Evans; John Jumper; James Kirkpatrick; Laurent Sifre; Tim Green; Chongli Qin; Augustin Žídek; Alexander W R Nelson; Alex Bridgland; Hugo Penedones; Stig Petersen; Karen Simonyan; Steve Crossan; Pushmeet Kohli; David T Jones; David Silver; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Alpan Raval; Stefano Piana; Michael P Eastwood; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-05-15

8.  Protein structure refinement via molecular-dynamics simulations: What works and what does not?

Authors:  Michael Feig; Vahid Mirjalili
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-08-17

9.  Protein structure determination using metagenome sequence data.

Authors:  Sergey Ovchinnikov; Hahnbeom Park; Neha Varghese; Po-Ssu Huang; Georgios A Pavlopoulos; David E Kim; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Nikos C Kyrpides; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Improved Sampling Strategies for Protein Model Refinement Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Collin F Arbour; Giacomo Janson; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Protein Function Analysis through Machine Learning.

Authors:  Chris Avery; John Patterson; Tyler Grear; Theodore Frater; Donald J Jacobs
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-09-06

2.  Evaluation of model refinement in CASP14.

Authors:  Adam J Simpkin; Filomeno Sánchez Rodríguez; Shahram Mesdaghi; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Daniel J Rigden
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-07-29

3.  Ins and outs of AlphaFold2 transmembrane protein structure predictions.

Authors:  Tamás Hegedűs; Markus Geisler; Gergely László Lukács; Bianka Farkas
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Assessing the utility of CASP14 models for molecular replacement.

Authors:  Claudia Millán; Ronan M Keegan; Joana Pereira; Massimo D Sammito; Adam J Simpkin; Airlie J McCoy; Andrei N Lupas; Marcus D Hartmann; Daniel J Rigden; Randy J Read
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-08-21

5.  A-Prot: protein structure modeling using MSA transformer.

Authors:  Yiyu Hong; Juyong Lee; Junsu Ko
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.