Literature DB >> 31942072

Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning.

Andrew W Senior1, Richard Evans2, John Jumper2, James Kirkpatrick2, Laurent Sifre2, Tim Green2, Chongli Qin2, Augustin Žídek2, Alexander W R Nelson2, Alex Bridgland2, Hugo Penedones2, Stig Petersen2, Karen Simonyan2, Steve Crossan2, Pushmeet Kohli2, David T Jones3,4, David Silver2, Koray Kavukcuoglu2, Demis Hassabis2.   

Abstract

Protein structure prediction can be used to determine the three-dimensional shape of a protein from its amino acid sequence1. This problem is of fundamental importance as the structure of a protein largely determines its function2; however, protein structures can be difficult to determine experimentally. Considerable progress has recently been made by leveraging genetic information. It is possible to infer which amino acid residues are in contact by analysing covariation in homologous sequences, which aids in the prediction of protein structures3. Here we show that we can train a neural network to make accurate predictions of the distances between pairs of residues, which convey more information about the structure than contact predictions. Using this information, we construct a potential of mean force4 that can accurately describe the shape of a protein. We find that the resulting potential can be optimized by a simple gradient descent algorithm to generate structures without complex sampling procedures. The resulting system, named AlphaFold, achieves high accuracy, even for sequences with fewer homologous sequences. In the recent Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction5 (CASP13)-a blind assessment of the state of the field-AlphaFold created high-accuracy structures (with template modelling (TM) scores6 of 0.7 or higher) for 24 out of 43 free modelling domains, whereas the next best method, which used sampling and contact information, achieved such accuracy for only 14 out of 43 domains. AlphaFold represents a considerable advance in protein-structure prediction. We expect this increased accuracy to enable insights into the function and malfunction of proteins, especially in cases for which no structures for homologous proteins have been experimentally determined7.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31942072     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  41 in total

1.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

2.  Optimization by simulated annealing.

Authors:  S Kirkpatrick; C D Gelatt; M P Vecchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Template-based and free modeling of I-TASSER and QUARK pipelines using predicted contact maps in CASP12.

Authors:  Chengxin Zhang; S M Mortuza; Baoji He; Yanting Wang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-14

Review 4.  The protein folding problem.

Authors:  Ken A Dill; S Banu Ozkan; M Scott Shell; Thomas R Weikl
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 5.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 6.  The protein-folding problem, 50 years on.

Authors:  Ken A Dill; Justin L MacCallum
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Protein structure prediction: when is it useful?

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIII.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Maya Topf; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-10-23

9.  Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co-evolution and deep learning coming of age.

Authors:  Joerg Schaarschmidt; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-07

10.  Protein structure prediction using multiple deep neural networks in the 13th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13).

Authors:  Andrew W Senior; Richard Evans; John Jumper; James Kirkpatrick; Laurent Sifre; Tim Green; Chongli Qin; Augustin Žídek; Alexander W R Nelson; Alex Bridgland; Hugo Penedones; Stig Petersen; Karen Simonyan; Steve Crossan; Pushmeet Kohli; David T Jones; David Silver; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-12
View more
  437 in total

1.  Deep Learning applications for COVID-19.

Authors:  Connor Shorten; Taghi M Khoshgoftaar; Borko Furht
Journal:  J Big Data       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 2.  The role of chest computed tomography in the management of COVID-19: A review of results and recommendations.

Authors:  Molly D Wong; Theresa Thai; Yuhua Li; Hong Liu
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-06-26

3.  Machine Learning Attempts for Predicting Human Subcutaneous Bioavailability of Monoclonal Antibodies.

Authors:  Hao Lou; Michael J Hageman
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Machine Learning in a Molecular Modeling Course for Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Biophysics Students.

Authors:  Jacob M Remington; Jonathon B Ferrell; Marlo Zorman; Adam Petrucci; Severin T Schneebeli; Jianing Li
Journal:  Biophysicist (Rockv)       Date:  2020-08-13

6.  Neural networks for protein structure and function prediction and dynamic analysis.

Authors:  Yuko Tsuchiya; Kentaro Tomii
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-03-12

7.  Deep learning for inferring transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Peter K Koo; Matt Ploenzke
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2020-06-11

Review 8.  Challenges in protein docking.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Geared Toward Applications: A Perspective on Functional Sequence-Controlled Polymers.

Authors:  Cangjie Yang; Kevin B Wu; Yu Deng; Jingsong Yuan; Jia Niu
Journal:  ACS Macro Lett       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.903

10.  Learning to Make Chemical Predictions: the Interplay of Feature Representation, Data, and Machine Learning Methods.

Authors:  Mojtaba Haghighatlari; Jie Li; Farnaz Heidar-Zadeh; Yuchen Liu; Xingyi Guan; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  Chem       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 22.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.