Literature DB >> 3362177

Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital.

C S Landefeld1, M M Chren, A Myers, R Geller, S Robbins, L Goldman.   

Abstract

To determine the extent to which autopsies yield unexpected findings that are relevant to the patient's death and whether cases with a high yield of such findings can be identified selectively, we studied a total of 233 autopsies at a university hospital and at a community hospital. The rates at which autopsies detected major unexpected findings whose premortem diagnosis would probably have improved survival were 11 percent at the university hospital and 12 percent at the community hospital. Major unexpected findings whose premortem diagnosis would not have prolonged survival were found in another 12 and 21 percent of cases, respectively. Pulmonary embolism and fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts were the most common major unexpected findings. Neither we nor the patients' physicians were able to identify from the clinical data the autopsies likely to have high yields. Furthermore, the physicians' estimates of an autopsy's expected yield were similar for patients evaluated by autopsy and for matched patients who were not. We conclude that the autopsy continues to yield clinically relevant findings at a high level and that it is not currently possible to predict which cases will have high yields. Autopsies are vital to ensure the quality of medical care, and autopsy rates must be increased substantially if this role is to be fully realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3362177     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198805123181906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  36 in total

1.  Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study.

Authors:  Malcolm Brodlie; Ian A Laing; Jean W Keeling; Kathryn J McKenzie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

2.  Capturing zebras: what to do with a reportable case.

Authors:  S M Wright; C Kouroukis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Health and safety at necropsy.

Authors:  J L Burton
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  The impact of the organ retention controversy on the practice of hospital necropsy: a four year audit.

Authors:  D McGuone; E W Kay
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Trends of accuracy of clinical diagnoses of the basic cause of death in a university hospital.

Authors:  M H C Grade; S Zucoloto; J K Kajiwara; M T P Fernandes; L G F Couto; S B Garcia
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Value and impact of necropsy in paediatric cardiology.

Authors:  M A Gatzoulis; M N Sheppard; S Y Ho
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Necropsy practice after the "organ retention scandal": requests, performance, and tissue retention.

Authors:  J L Burton; J C E Underwood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Deaths and necropsies in a thoracic unit.

Authors:  D A Boldy; C Jones; H Matthews; C Edwards
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.