Literature DB >> 25311505

Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.

Serdar Celik1, Ozan Bozkurt, Fatih Gulbey Kaya, Sedat Egriboyun, Omer Demir, Mustafa Secil, Ilhan Celebi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently, the most widely used method of treatment of urinary tract stones is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Patient and stone characteristics are important for SWL success. We evaluated noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) characteristics of urinary tract stones for the prediction of SWL success.
METHODS: Records of patients who underwent NCCT before SWL treatment between January 2008 and June 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic data were recruited from patient files. Hounsfield units (HU), stone size and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) were measured on NCCT. After serial measurements of the highest HU value (HUmax) and lowest HU value (HUmin), HU value was calculated as the average of these two values (HUave). These parameters were compared between successful [stone-free (SF) group] and unsuccessful [residual fragment (RF) group] cases after SWL.
RESULTS: A total of 254 patients, 113 kidney stones and 141 ureteral stones, were evaluated. Mean age was 51.0±14.6 (18-87) years, and mean stone size was 10.9±3.7 mm. Stone diameter, HUmax, HUmin and HUave were significantly lower in SF group when compared with RF group for both kidney and ureteral stones (p<0.05). We also found that SSD for kidney stones was predictive for SWL success.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that HUmax, HUmin and HUave values are significant predictors of SWL success for both kidney and ureteral stones. They might be used in daily clinical practice for patient counselling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25311505     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0857-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  17 in total

1.  Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.

Authors:  Gyan Pareek; Sean P Hedican; Fred T Lee; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.

Authors:  Idir Ouzaid; Said Al-qahtani; Sébastien Dominique; Vincent Hupertan; Pédro Fernandez; Jean-François Hermieu; Vincent Delmas; Vincent Ravery
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography.

Authors:  J R Fielding; G Steele; L A Fox; H Heller; K R Loughlin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Radiographic prognostic criteria for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a study of 485 patients.

Authors:  D Bon; B Dore; J Irani; M Marroncle; J Aubert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Analysis of stone fragility in vitro and in vivo with piezoelectric shock waves using the EDAP LT-01.

Authors:  Y H Wang; L Grenabo; H Hedelin; S Pettersson; G Wikholm; B F Zachrisson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  In situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of distal ureteral stones: parameters for therapeutic success.

Authors:  P Mattelaer; T Schröder; N Fischer; G Jakse
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  [Extracorporeal lithotripsy in the treatment of renal lithiasis. 5 years' experience].

Authors:  C Chaussy; G Fuchs
Journal:  J Urol (Paris)       Date:  1986

8.  Calcium oxalate stone morphology: fine tuning our therapeutic distinctions.

Authors:  S P Dretler; G Polykoff
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study.

Authors:  Peter Joseph; A K Mandal; S K Singh; Purabi Mandal; S N Sankhwar; S K Sharma
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; W Brendel; E Schmiedt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  A novel method for prediction of stone composition: the average and difference of Hounsfield units and their cut-off values.

Authors:  Serdar Celik; Ertugrul Sefik; Ismail Basmacı; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Mehmet Erhan Aydın; Tarık Yonguc; Tansu Degirmenci
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in new versus those patients with previous history of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on ipsilateral side.

Authors:  Nadeem Iqbal; Sajid Iqbal; Nasir Zareen; Keron Akintola Ayodele Blair
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.340

4.  How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?

Authors:  Gautier Müllhaupt; Daniel S Engeler; Hans-Peter Schmid; Dominik Abt
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Is scoring system of computed tomography based metric parameters can accurately predicts shock wave lithotripsy stone-free rates and aid in the development of treatment strategies?

Authors:  Yasser Ali Badran; Alsayed Saad Abdelaziz; Mohamed Ahmed Shehab; Hazem Abdelsabour Dief Mohamed; Absel-Aziz Ali Emara; Ali Mohamed Ali Elnabtity; Maged Mohammed Ghanem; Hesham Abdel Azim ELHelaly
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.