Literature DB >> 29749979

Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL).

James C Williams1, Chad A Zarse1, Molly E Jackson1, James E Lingeman2, James A McAteer1.   

Abstract

Great variability exists in the response of urinary stones to SWL, and this is true even for stones composed of the same mineral. Efforts have been made to predict stone fragility to shock waves using computed tomography (CT) patient images, but most work to date has focused on the use of stone CT number (i.e., Hounsfield units). This is an easy number to measure on a patient stone, but its value depends on a number of factors, including the relationship of the size of the stone to the resolution (i.e., the slicewidth) of the CT scan. Studies that have shown a relationship between stone CT number and failure in SWL are reviewed, and all are shown to suffer from error due to stone size, which was not accounted for in the use of Hounsfield unit values. Preliminary data are then presented for a study of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones, in which stone structure-rather than simple CT number values-is shown to correlate with fragility to shock waves. COM stones that were observed to have structure by micro CT (e.g., voids, apatite regions, unusual shapes) broke to completion in about half the number of shock waves required for COM stones that were observed to be homogeneous in structure by CT. This result suggests another direction for the use of CT in predicting success of SWL: the use of CT to view stone structure, rather than simply measuring stone CT number. Viewing stone structure by CT requires the use of different viewing windows than those typically used for examining patient scans, but much research to date indicates that stone structure can be observed in the clinical setting. Future clinical studies will need to be done to verify the relationship between stone structure observed by CT and stone fragility in SWL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  43.40.Ng; 81.70.Tx; 87.54.Hk; Hounsfield unit; computed tomography; kidney stones; micro CT; shock wave lithotripsy

Year:  2007        PMID: 29749979      PMCID: PMC5939597          DOI: 10.1063/1.2723592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIP Conf Proc        ISSN: 0094-243X


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size.

Authors:  Narendra Narepalem; Chandru P Sundaram; Illya C Boridy; Yan Yan; Jay P Heiken; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The efficacy of non-contrast helical computed tomography in the prediction of urinary stone composition in vivo.

Authors:  A Demirel; S Suma
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.

Authors:  Zubayr R Zaman; Sashi S Kommu; Nicholas A Watkin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Cystine: helical computerized tomography characterization of rough and smooth calculi in vitro.

Authors:  Samuel C Kim; Erin K Hatt; James E Lingeman; Robert B Nadler; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  [ESWL-resistant lithiasis].

Authors:  C González Enguita; J L Rodríguez Miñón-Cifuentes; J Cabrera Pérez; E García de la Peña; F J Calahorra Fernández; J García Cardoso; R Vela Navarrete
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 0.994

Review 6.  Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi.

Authors:  James C Williams; Samuel C Kim; Chad A Zarse; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Correction of helical CT attenuation values with wide beam collimation: in vitro test with urinary calculi.

Authors:  J C Williams; K C Saw; A G Monga; G T Chua; J E Lingeman; J A McAteer
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Matthew T Gettman; Audrey L Rohlinger; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography.

Authors:  Khaled Z Sheir; Osama Mansour; Khaled Madbouly; Emad Elsobky; Mohamed Abdel-Khalek
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-01-06

10.  [The usefulness of computerized axial tomography (CT) in establishing the composition of calculi].

Authors:  F J Burgos; J Sánchez; S Avila; J C Saez; A Escudero Barrilero
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 0.436

View more
  1 in total

1.  Histogram of kidney stones on non-contrast computed tomography to predict successful stone dusting during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Dong Soo Kim; Sung Kyoung Moon; Sang Hyub Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.