Literature DB >> 33551904

The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science.

David M Sanbonmatsu1, Emily H Cooley1, Jonathan E Butner1.   

Abstract

The study of human behavior is severely hampered by logistical problems, ethical and legal constraints, and funding shortfalls. However, the biggest difficulty of conducting social and behavioral research is the extraordinary complexity of the study phenomena. In this article, we review the impact of complexity on research design, hypothesis testing, measurement, data analyses, reproducibility, and the communication of findings in psychological science. The systematic investigation of the world often requires different approaches because of the variability in complexity. Confirmatory testing, multi-factorial designs, survey methods, large samples, and modeling are frequently needed to study complex social and behavioral topics. Complexity impedes the measurement of general constructs, the reproducibility of results and scientific reporting, and the general rigor of research. Many of the benchmarks established by classic work in physical science are not attainable in studies of more complex phenomena. Consequently, the standards used to evaluate scientific research should be tethered to the complexity of the study topic.
Copyright © 2021 Sanbonmatsu, Cooley and Butner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complexity; measurement; methods; reproduction; scientific rigor

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551904      PMCID: PMC7859482          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  48 in total

1.  Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean?

Authors:  Scott E Maxwell; Michael Y Lau; George S Howard
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2015-09

2.  Complexity in biology. Exceeding the limits of reductionism and determinism using complexity theory.

Authors:  Fulvio Mazzocchi
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

4.  The Psychology of Replication and Replication in Psychology.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

Review 5.  Voodoo Correlations Are Everywhere-Not Only in Neuroscience.

Authors:  Klaus Fiedler
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03

6.  The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stroebe; Fritz Strack
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-01

7.  Don't characterize replications as successes or failures.

Authors:  Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.579

8.  Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics.

Authors:  Colin F Camerer; Anna Dreber; Eskil Forsell; Teck-Hua Ho; Jürgen Huber; Magnus Johannesson; Michael Kirchler; Johan Almenberg; Adam Altmejd; Taizan Chan; Emma Heikensten; Felix Holzmeister; Taisuke Imai; Siri Isaksson; Gideon Nave; Thomas Pfeiffer; Michael Razen; Hang Wu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment.

Authors:  Denes Szucs; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.