Literature DB >> 31064510

Don't characterize replications as successes or failures.

Andrew Gelman1.   

Abstract

No replication is truly direct, and I recommend moving away from the classification of replications as "direct" or "conceptual" to a framework in which we accept that treatment effects vary across conditions. Relatedly, we should stop labeling replications as successes or failures and instead use continuous measures to compare different studies, again using meta-analysis of raw data where possible.

Year:  2018        PMID: 31064510     DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X18000638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  2 in total

1.  Replications in Comparative Cognition: What Should We Expect and How Can We Improve?

Authors:  Benjamin G Farrar; Markus Boeckle; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Anim Behav Cogn       Date:  2020-02

Review 2.  The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science.

Authors:  David M Sanbonmatsu; Emily H Cooley; Jonathan E Butner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.