| Literature DB >> 26940865 |
Colin F Camerer1, Anna Dreber2, Eskil Forsell2, Teck-Hua Ho3, Jürgen Huber4, Magnus Johannesson2, Michael Kirchler5, Johan Almenberg6, Adam Altmejd2, Taizan Chan7, Emma Heikensten2, Felix Holzmeister4, Taisuke Imai1, Siri Isaksson2, Gideon Nave1, Thomas Pfeiffer8, Michael Razen4, Hang Wu9.
Abstract
The replicability of some scientific findings has recently been called into question. To contribute data about replicability in economics, we replicated 18 studies published in the American Economic Review and the Quarterly Journal of Economics between 2011 and 2014. All of these replications followed predefined analysis plans that were made publicly available beforehand, and they all have a statistical power of at least 90% to detect the original effect size at the 5% significance level. We found a significant effect in the same direction as in the original study for 11 replications (61%); on average, the replicated effect size is 66% of the original. The replicability rate varies between 67% and 78% for four additional replicability indicators, including a prediction market measure of peer beliefs.Year: 2016 PMID: 26940865 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf0918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728