Literature DB >> 26940865

Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics.

Colin F Camerer1, Anna Dreber2, Eskil Forsell2, Teck-Hua Ho3, Jürgen Huber4, Magnus Johannesson2, Michael Kirchler5, Johan Almenberg6, Adam Altmejd2, Taizan Chan7, Emma Heikensten2, Felix Holzmeister4, Taisuke Imai1, Siri Isaksson2, Gideon Nave1, Thomas Pfeiffer8, Michael Razen4, Hang Wu9.   

Abstract

The replicability of some scientific findings has recently been called into question. To contribute data about replicability in economics, we replicated 18 studies published in the American Economic Review and the Quarterly Journal of Economics between 2011 and 2014. All of these replications followed predefined analysis plans that were made publicly available beforehand, and they all have a statistical power of at least 90% to detect the original effect size at the 5% significance level. We found a significant effect in the same direction as in the original study for 11 replications (61%); on average, the replicated effect size is 66% of the original. The replicability rate varies between 67% and 78% for four additional replicability indicators, including a prediction market measure of peer beliefs.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Year:  2016        PMID: 26940865     DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf0918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  83 in total

1.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Toward a science of delivering aid with dignity: Experimental evidence and local forecasts from Kenya.

Authors:  Catherine C Thomas; Nicholas G Otis; Justin R Abraham; Hazel Rose Markus; Gregory M Walton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The power of prediction markets.

Authors:  Adam Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science.

Authors:  Justin T Pickett; Sean Patrick Roche
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  What Crisis? Management Researchers' Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct.

Authors:  Christian Hopp; Gary A Hoover
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Wu Youyou; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evidence of general economic principles of bargaining and trade from 2,000 classroom experiments.

Authors:  Po-Hsuan Lin; Alexander L Brown; Taisuke Imai; Joseph Tao-Yi Wang; Stephanie W Wang; Colin F Camerer
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-08-03

8.  Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Bayesian markets to elicit private information.

Authors:  Aurélien Baillon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.

Authors:  Amanda Kvarven; Eirik Strømland; Magnus Johannesson
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.