Literature DB >> 26315443

PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

.   

Abstract

Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original materials when available. Replication effects were half the magnitude of original effects, representing a substantial decline. Ninety-seven percent of original studies had statistically significant results. Thirty-six percent of replications had statistically significant results; 47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size; 39% of effects were subjectively rated to have replicated the original result; and if no bias in original results is assumed, combining original and replication results left 68% with statistically significant effects. Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26315443     DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  946 in total

1.  Explicit drinking identity and alcohol problems: The mediating role of drinking to cope.

Authors:  Angelo M DiBello; Mary Beth Miller; Chelsie M Young; Clayton Neighbors; Kristen P Lindgren
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Transparency and Reproducibility of Observational Cohort Studies Using Large Healthcare Databases.

Authors:  S V Wang; P Verpillat; J A Rassen; A Patrick; E M Garry; D B Bartels
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Markets for replication.

Authors:  Alec Brandon; John A List
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Why developmental psychology is incomplete without comparative and cross-cultural perspectives.

Authors:  Mark Nielsen; Daniel Haun
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Genes, Environments, and Sex Differences in Alcohol Research.

Authors:  Jessica E Salvatore; Seung Bin Cho; Danielle M Dick
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  Form and Function in Human Song.

Authors:  Samuel A Mehr; Manvir Singh; Hunter York; Luke Glowacki; Max M Krasnow
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.

Authors:  Amanda F Mejia; Mary Beth Nebel; Anita D Barber; Ann S Choe; James J Pekar; Brian S Caffo; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Considerations when processing and interpreting genomics data of the placenta.

Authors:  Chaini Konwar; Giulia Del Gobbo; Victor Yuan; Wendy P Robinson
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Network Analysis as an Alternative Approach to Conceptualizing Eating Disorders: Implications for Research and Treatment.

Authors:  Cheri A Levinson; Irina A Vanzhula; Leigh C Brosof; Kelsie Forbush
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Using Design Thinking to Improve Psychological Interventions: The Case of the Growth Mindset During the Transition to High School.

Authors:  David S Yeager; Carissa Romero; Dave Paunesku; Christopher S Hulleman; Barbara Schneider; Cintia Hinojosa; Hae Yeon Lee; Joseph O'Brien; Kate Flint; Alice Roberts; Jill Trott; Daniel Greene; Gregory M Walton; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.