Literature DB >> 6842808

Vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Experience in private practice.

E Gellman, M S Goldstein, S Kaplan, W J Shapiro.   

Abstract

To test whether vaginal delivery after cesarean section (VDAC) is a safe alternative to repeated section, a retrospective chart review of 2,350 deliveries during a ten-year period in a private practice group committed to VDAC was studied. Eighty-five parturients met six predetermined safety criteria and were permitted a trial of labor. These criteria were (1) prior low-segment transverse uterine incision; (2) vertex presentation; (3) carefully monitored labor with obstetrician present; (4) availability of emergency facilities; (5) no administration of oxytocin; and (6) patients' consent and desire to pursue VDAC. Seventy-six labors (89%) managed expectantly were successful in VDAC. No maternal or fetal morbidity was detected. No uterine ruptures were detected on postpartum examination or at the time of cesarean section. These results support the 1980 report of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development recommending that labor and VDAC are of low risk to mother and fetus in properly selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6842808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  5 in total

1.  VBAC: Is It Safe for Your Patients?

Authors:  A J Reid
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; H Bilodeau; R Blais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Factors influencing the practice of vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; L Potvin; R Blais; H Bilodeau
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies?

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.