Literature DB >> 6859134

Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth.

J N Martin, B A Harris, J F Huddleston, J C Morrison, M G Propst, W L Wiser, H W Perlis, J T Davidson.   

Abstract

Because of the rising cesarean birth rate in the United States, renewed interest in vaginal delivery after prior abdominal operation has been evident. In a prospective collaborative study 789 patients were evaluated for inclusion into this investigation. Of the 717 subjects who entered the study 162 chose to attempt vaginal birth and 101 were successful. Desire for tubal sterilization and the lack of prior vaginal delivery were significant correlates of the group selecting repeat abdominal birth and of those who were unsuccessful when vaginal delivery was attempted. There were eight dehiscences and three uterine ruptures among the 717 patients and none was related to catastrophic outcome for the mother or neonate. Perinatal losses (12) were not related to uterine rupture or method of delivery. There were no significant differences in uterine disruption between patients selecting either route of delivery. Likewise ancillary factors such as a prior febrile puerperium (endometritis), number of prior cesarean births, low-vertical uterine incisions, recurrent operative indications, the use of epidural anesthesia, or oxytocin administration were not discriminating factors in whether women chose to attempt or were successful in completing vaginal delivery after prior abdominal birth. From our data vaginal birth after cesarean section appears to be safe if conducted in a carefully selected population that is closely monitored in a prospective manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6859134     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90746-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Marian S McDonagh; Patricia Osterweil; Peggy Nygren; Benjamin K S Chan; Mark Helfand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

2.  VBAC: Is It Safe for Your Patients?

Authors:  A J Reid
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  The use of oxytocin after a previous caesarean section--a review and report on a series.

Authors:  D Bider; G Barkai; H J Carp; S Mashiach
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Obstetrical anaesthesia update--1984.

Authors:  D R Biehl
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1984-05

6.  Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Maternal urological injuries associated with vaginal deliveries: change of pattern.

Authors:  S A Kattan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.