Literature DB >> 3351576

Neural mechanisms in vibrotactile adaptation.

S O'Mara1, M J Rowe, R P Tarvin.   

Abstract

1. Peripheral and central neural contributions to vibrotactile adaptation were investigated in decerebrate or anesthetized cats by recording from sensory nerve fibers associated with Pacinian corpuscle (PC) receptors and from central neurons of the dorsal column nuclei that receive their input from vibration-sensitive receptors of the forelimb footpads. Responsiveness of units was assessed using 1-s duration, test vibration stimuli delivered with 1- to 2-mm-diam probes at different times following adapting trains of vibration (usually 300 Hz) that lasted from less than 1 min up to 50 min. 2. Cuneate neuron responsiveness underwent marked depression following prior vibration. The extent of the depression and the time course of recovery in responsiveness were dependent on the intensity and duration of the adapting vibratory stimulus. The recovery time course (often several minutes) was approximately exponential and resembled the reported time course of subjective vibrotactile adaptation obtained in psychophysical experiments. 3. Response depression in PC fibers was only seen at low amplitudes of the test vibration and displayed a brief time course of recovery in comparison with that seen in cuneate neurons. It is therefore unlikely to account for the adaptation time course either in cuneate neurons or at a subjective level. Furthermore, as the adaptation seen in PC fiber responses had a similar time course in both cutaneous and mesenteric PC fibers it is unlikely that mechanical changes in the skin contribute significantly to the adaptation in PC fiber responses to vibration. 4. The time course of afferent-induced inhibition following long periods of prior vibration was too brief to account for the response adaptation in cuneate neurons. 5. As the long-term response depression in cuneate neurons following their prior activation was seen for inputs from unconditioned sites within the neuron's excitatory receptive field, as well as from the conditioned site, it appears that the response adaptation is attributable to changes in the central neuron or in synaptic processes associated with the central neuron. It is proposed that this adaptation may be due to an increase in extracellular potassium ion concentration that alters the responsiveness of the central neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3351576     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.59.2.607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Transmission security for single kinesthetic afferent fibers of joint origin and their target cuneate neurons in the cat.

Authors:  Gordon T Coleman; Hong-Qi Zhang; Mark J Rowe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Perceived pitch of vibrotactile stimuli: effects of vibration amplitude, and implications for vibration frequency coding.

Authors:  J W Morley; M J Rowe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Peripheral vs. central determinants of vibrotactile adaptation.

Authors:  A Klöcker; D Gueorguiev; J L Thonnard; A Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Food vibrations: Asian spice sets lips trembling.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hagura; Harry Barber; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  Y Y Leung; S J Bensmaïa; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Input-output relation of the somatosensory system for mechanical air-puff stimulation of the index finger in man.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Gatayama; K Yoshikawa; M Sasaki; M Nomura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; Y Y Leung; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Attenuation of somatosensory evoked potentials by acupuncture and tactile skin stimulation in man.

Authors:  Y Kawashima; S Toma; Y Nakajima
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Benoit P Delhaye; Matthew A Schiefer; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Application of a new, self-recording, vibratory sensation meter to measure temporary threshold shift of vibratory sensation caused by local vibration exposure.

Authors:  K Nishiyama; K Taoda; H Yamashita; S Watanabe
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.