Literature DB >> 16222071

Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Y Y Leung1, S J Bensmaïa, S S Hsiao, K O Johnson.   

Abstract

Extended suprathreshold vibratory stimulation applied to the skin results in a desensitization of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. In a companion paper, we describe the dependence of the threshold shift on the parameters of the adapting stimulus and discuss neural mechanisms underlying afferent adaptation. Here we describe the time-course of afferent adaptation and recovery. We found that absolute and entrainment thresholds rise and fall exponentially during adaptation and recovery with time constants that vary with fiber type. slowly adapting type I (SA1) afferents adapt most rapidly, and pacinian (PC) afferents adapt most slowly, whereas rapidly adapting (RA) afferents exhibit intermediate rates of adaptation; SA1 fibers also recover more rapidly from adaptation than RA and PC fibers. We also showed that threshold adaptation is accompanied by a shift in the timing of the spikes within individual cycles of the adapting stimulus (i.e., a shift in the impulse phase). We invoked an integrate-and-fire model to explore possible mechanisms underlying afferent adaptation. Finally, we found that the time-course of afferent adaptation is more rapid than that of its psychophysical counterpart, as is the time-course of recovery from adaptation, suggesting that central factors play a role in the psychophysical phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16222071      PMCID: PMC1839047          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00001.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

1.  Stability of rapidly adapting afferent entrainment vs responsivity.

Authors:  B L Whitsel; E F Kelly; K A Delemos; M Xu; P M Quibrera
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.111

2.  Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; Y Y Leung; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand.

Authors:  W H Talbot; I Darian-Smith; H H Kornhuber; V B Mountcastle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of sensory adaptation on the form of the psychophysical magnitude function for cutaneous vibration.

Authors:  G A Gescheider; J H Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-06

5.  Low-frequency vibrotactile adaptation.

Authors:  J F Hahn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-12

6.  Adaption and recovery in vibrotactile perception.

Authors:  U Berglund; B Berglund
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1970-06

7.  Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand.

Authors:  R S Johansson; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey.

Authors:  A W Freeman; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model.

Authors:  A W Freeman; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Mechanical transmission in a Pacinian corpuscle. An analysis and a theory.

Authors:  W R Loewenstein; R Skalak
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  42 in total

1.  Adaptation of swallowing hyo-laryngeal kinematics is distinct in oral vs. pharyngeal sensory processing.

Authors:  Ianessa A Humbert; Akshay Lokhande; Heather Christopherson; Rebecca German; Alice Stone
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-03-08

2.  Peripheral vs. central determinants of vibrotactile adaptation.

Authors:  A Klöcker; D Gueorguiev; J L Thonnard; A Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Food vibrations: Asian spice sets lips trembling.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hagura; Harry Barber; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Human MST but not MT responds to tactile stimulation.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Nafi E Yasar; Neel Kishan; Tony Ro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; Y Y Leung; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Representation of object size in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  L J Berryman; J M Yau; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  V Tannan; S Simons; R G Dennis; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The fundamental unit of pain is the cell.

Authors:  David B Reichling; Paul G Green; Jon D Levine
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Benoit P Delhaye; Matthew A Schiefer; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.