Literature DB >> 16014802

Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

S J Bensmaïa1, Y Y Leung, S S Hsiao, K O Johnson.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of extended suprathreshold vibratory stimulation on the sensitivity of slowly adapting type 1 (SA1), rapidly adapting (RA), and Pacinian (PC) afferents. To that end, an algorithm was developed to track afferent absolute (I0) and entrainment (I1) thresholds as they change over time. We recorded afferent responses to periliminal vibratory test stimuli, which were interleaved with intense vibratory conditioning stimuli during the adaptation period of each experimental run. From these measurements, the algorithm allowed us to infer changes in the afferents' sensitivity. We investigated the stimulus parameters that affect adaptation by assessing the degree to which adaptation depends on the amplitude and frequency of the adapting stimulus. For all three afferent types, I0 and I1 increased with increasing adaptation frequency and amplitude. The degree of adaptation seems to be independent of the firing rate evoked in the afferent by the conditioning stimulus. In the analysis, we distinguished between additive adaptation (in which I0 and I1 shift equally) and multiplicative effects (in which the ratio I1/I0 remains constant). RA threshold shifts are almost perfectly additive. SA1 threshold shifts are close to additive and far from multiplicative (I1 threshold shifts are twice the I0 shifts). PC shifts are more difficult to classify. We used an integrate-and-fire model to study the possible neural mechanisms. A change in transducer gain predicts a multiplicative change in I0 and I1 and is thus ruled out as a mechanism underlying SA1 and RA adaptation. A change in the resting action potential threshold predicts equal, additive change in I0 and I1 and thus accounts well for RA adaptation. A change in the degree of refractoriness during the relative refractory period predicts an additional change in I1 such as that observed for SA1 fibers. We infer that adaptation is caused by an increase in spiking thresholds produced by ion flow through transducer channels in the receptor membrane. In a companion paper, we describe the time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery for SA1, RA, and PC fibers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16014802      PMCID: PMC1994926          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00002.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  31 in total

1.  Stability of rapidly adapting afferent entrainment vs responsivity.

Authors:  B L Whitsel; E F Kelly; K A Delemos; M Xu; P M Quibrera
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.111

2.  The depression of the receptor potential in pacinian corpuscles.

Authors:  J DIAMOND; J A GRAY; D R INMAN
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1958-04-03       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  Y Y Leung; S J Bensmaïa; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Ca(2+)-activated K+ currents in neurones: types, physiological roles and modulation.

Authors:  P Sah
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Perceived intensity of vibrotactile stimuli: the role of mechanoreceptive channels.

Authors:  M Hollins; E A Roy
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Adaptation-induced enhancement of vibrotactile amplitude discrimination: the role of adapting frequency.

Authors:  K A Delemos; M Hollins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances frequency discrimination.

Authors:  A K Goble; M Hollins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Calcium inflow of hamster Merkel cells in response to hyposmotic stimulation indicate a stretch activated ion channel.

Authors:  M Tazaki; T Suzuki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1998-02-27       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Time-dependence of SI RA neuron response to cutaneous flutter stimulation.

Authors:  B L Whitsel; E F Kelly; M Quibrera; M Tommerdahl; Y Li; O V Favorov; M Xu; C B Metz
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.111

10.  Post-tetanic potentiation and depression of generator potential in a single non-myelinated nerve ending.

Authors:  W R LOEWENSTEIN; S COHEN
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1959-11       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  50 in total

1.  Peripheral vs. central determinants of vibrotactile adaptation.

Authors:  A Klöcker; D Gueorguiev; J L Thonnard; A Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Food vibrations: Asian spice sets lips trembling.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hagura; Harry Barber; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  Y Y Leung; S J Bensmaïa; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Representation of object size in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  L J Berryman; J M Yau; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Tactile perception in adults with autism: a multidimensional psychophysical study.

Authors:  Carissa Cascio; Francis McGlone; Stephen Folger; Vinay Tannan; Grace Baranek; Kevin A Pelphrey; Gregory Essick
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-04-06

7.  Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  V Tannan; S Simons; R G Dennis; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures.

Authors:  Alison I Weber; Hannes P Saal; Justin D Lieber; Ju-Wen Cheng; Louise R Manfredi; John F Dammann; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Memory-guided force control in healthy younger and older adults.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Shaadee Samimy; Samantha L Blouch; Peiyuan Wang; Amanda Chennavasin; Michele T Diaz; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Benoit P Delhaye; Matthew A Schiefer; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.