Literature DB >> 2100311

Perceived pitch of vibrotactile stimuli: effects of vibration amplitude, and implications for vibration frequency coding.

J W Morley1, M J Rowe.   

Abstract

1. The effect of changes in amplitude on the perceived pitch of cutaneous vibratory stimuli was studied in psychophysical experiments designed to test whether the coding of information about the frequency of the vibration might be based on the ratio of recruitment of the PC (Pacinian corpuscle-associated) and RA (rapidly adapting) classes of tactile sensory fibres. The study was based on previous data which show that at certain vibration frequencies (e.g. 150 Hz) the ratio of recruitment of the PC and RA classes should vary as a function of vibration amplitude. 2. Sinusoidal vibration at either 30 Hz or 150 Hz, and at an amplitude 10 dB above subjective detection thresholds was delivered in a 1 s train to the distal phalangeal pad of the index finger in eight human subjects. This standard vibration was followed after 0.5 s by a 1 s comparison train of vibration which (unknown to the subject) was at the same frequency as the standard but at a range of amplitudes from 2 to 50 dB above the detection threshold. A two-alternative forced-choice procedure was used in which the subject had to indicate whether the comparison stimulus was higher or lower in pitch (frequency) than the standard. 3. Marked differences were seen from subject to subject in the effect of amplitude on perceived pitch at both 30 Hz and 150 Hz. At 150 Hz, five out of the eight subjects reported an increase in pitch as the amplitude of the comparison vibration increased, one experienced no change, and only two experienced the fall in perceived pitch that is predicted if the proposed ratio code contributes to vibrotactile pitch judgements. At 30 Hz similar intersubject variability was seen in the pitch-amplitude functions. 4. The results do not support the hypothesis that a ratio code contributes to vibrotactile pitch perception. We conclude that temporal patterning of impulse activity remains the major candidate code for pitch perception, at least over a substantial part of the vibrotactile frequency bandwidth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2100311      PMCID: PMC1181780          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  25 in total

1.  Vibrotactile frequency for encoding a speech parameter.

Authors:  M Rothenberg; R T Verrillo; S A Zahorian; M L Brachman; S J Bolanowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adaption and recovery in vibrotactile perception.

Authors:  U Berglund; B Berglund
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1970-06

3.  The effect of surface gradients on vibrotactile thresholds.

Authors:  R T Verrillo
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-03

4.  Quantifying sensory channels: generalizing colorimetry to orientation and texture, touch, and tones.

Authors:  W Richards
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-09

5.  Differential contributions to coding of cutaneous vibratory information by cortical somatosensory areas I and II.

Authors:  D G Ferrington; M Rowe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Tactile neuron classes within second somatosensory area (SII) of cat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  R E Bennett; D G Ferrington; M Rowe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Coding of information about tactile stimuli by neurones of the cuneate nucleus.

Authors:  P R Douglas; D G Ferrington; M Rowe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Functional capacities of tactile afferent fibres in neonatal kittens.

Authors:  D G Ferrington; M J Rowe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand.

Authors:  V B Mountcastle; R H LaMotte; G Carli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Human tactile detection thresholds: modification by inputs from specific tactile receptor classes.

Authors:  D G Ferrington; B S Nail; M Rowe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  9 in total

1.  Responses of cat ventroposterolateral thalamic neurons to vibrotactile stimulation of forelimb footpads.

Authors:  S Ghosh; A B Turman; R M Vickery; M J Rowe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Integration of auditory and vibrotactile stimuli: effects of frequency.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Impairment of human proprioception by high-frequency cutaneous vibration.

Authors:  N S Weerakkody; D A Mahns; J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Integration of vibrotactile frequency information beyond the mechanoreceptor channel and somatotopy.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Spatial and temporal influences on discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli on the arm.

Authors:  Valay A Shah; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt; Leigh A Mrotek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vibrotactile Perception for Sensorimotor Augmentation: Perceptual Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli Induced by Low-Cost Eccentric Rotating Mass Motors at Different Body Locations in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Ella Pomplun; Ashiya Thomas; Erin Corrigan; Valay A Shah; Leigh A Mrotek; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-07-01

7.  Vibrotactile Presentation of Musical Notes to the Glabrous Skin for Adults with Normal Hearing or a Hearing Impairment: Thresholds, Dynamic Range and High-Frequency Perception.

Authors:  Carl Hopkins; Saúl Maté-Cid; Robert Fulford; Gary Seiffert; Jane Ginsborg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Relative vibrotactile spatial acuity of the torso.

Authors:  Ómar I Jóhannesson; Rebekka Hoffmann; Vigdís Vala Valgeirsdóttir; Rúnar Unnþórsson; Alin Moldoveanu; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Measuring relative vibrotactile spatial acuity: effects of tactor type, anchor points and tactile anisotropy.

Authors:  Rebekka Hoffmann; Vigdís Vala Valgeirsdóttir; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Runar Unnthorsson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.