Literature DB >> 33501160

Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Surgical Simulator.

Ben Sainsbury1, Maciej Łącki2, Mohammed Shahait3, Mitchell Goldenberg4, Amir Baghdadi5, Lora Cavuoto5, Jing Ren2, Mark Green1, Jason Lee4, Timothy D Averch3, Carlos Rossa2.   

Abstract

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy is the standard surgical procedure used to remove large kidney stones. PCNL procedures have a steep learning curve; a physician needs to complete between 36 and 60 procedures, to achieve clinical proficiency. Marion Surgical K181 is a virtual reality surgical simulator, which emulates the PCNL procedures without compromising the well-being of patients. The simulator uses a VR headset to place a user in a realistic and immersive operating theater, and haptic force-feedback robots to render physical interactions between surgical tools and the virtual patient. The simulator has two modules for two different aspects of PCNL kidney stone removal procedure: kidney access module where the user must insert a needle into the kidney of the patient, and a kidney stone removal module where the user removes the individual stones from the organ. In this paper, we present user trials to validate the face and construct validity of the simulator. The results, based on the data gathered from 4 groups of users independently, indicate that Marion's surgical simulator is a useful tool for teaching and practicing PCNL procedures. The kidney stone removal module of the simulator has proven construct validity by identifying the skill level of different users based on their tool path. We plan to continue evaluating the simulator with a larger sample of users to reinforce our findings.
Copyright © 2020 Sainsbury, Łącki, Shahait, Goldenberg, Baghdadi, Cavuoto, Ren, Green, Lee, Averch and Rossa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCNL; haptics; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; simulation; surgical simulation and training; virtual reality

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501160      PMCID: PMC7805868          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  20 in total

1.  Operative experience of urological trainees in the UK.

Authors:  Jonathan D Gill; Lianne F Stewart; Nicholas J R George; Ian Eardley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Use of a virtual reality simulator to improve percutaneous renal access skills: a prospective study in urology trainees.

Authors:  A G Papatsoris; T Shaikh; D Patel; A Bourdoumis; C Bach; N Buchholz; J Masood; I Junaid
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Prevailing Trends in Haptic Feedback Simulation for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  David Pinzon; Simon Byrns; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 4.  To the point: medical education review of the role of simulators in surgical training.

Authors:  Maya M Hammoud; Francis S Nuthalapaty; Alice R Goepfert; Petra M Casey; Sandra Emmons; Eve L Espey; Joseph M Kaczmarczyk; Nadine T Katz; James J Neutens; Edward G Peskin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Lack of transfer of skills after virtual reality simulator training with haptic feedback.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Lars Eirik Bø; Esther Kuhry; Gjermund Johnsen; Ronald Mårvik; Thomas Langø; Toril Nagelhus Hernes
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.442

6.  Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Thomas Langø; Ronald Mårvik; Magdalena Karolina Chmarra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Limitations of haptic feedback devices on construct validity of the LapSim® virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Lars Eirik Bø; Magdalena Karolina Chmarra; Esther Kuhry; Gjermund Johnsen; Ronald Mårvik; Thomas Langø
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Linking simulation-based educational assessments and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Brydges; Rose Hatala; Benjamin Zendejas; Patricia J Erwin; David A Cook
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 9.  Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy--a critical review.

Authors:  Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Maria P Laguna; Jens J Rassweiler; Pierre Conort
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The effects of laparoscopic graspers with enhanced haptic feedback on applied forces: a randomized comparison with conventional graspers.

Authors:  Chantal C J Alleblas; Michel P H Vleugels; Sjors F P J Coppus; Theodoor E Nieboer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Trends and Innovations of Simulation for Twenty First Century Medical Education.

Authors:  Eduardo Herrera-Aliaga; Lisbell D Estrada
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.