Literature DB >> 26839212

Prevailing Trends in Haptic Feedback Simulation for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

David Pinzon1, Simon Byrns2, Bin Zheng2.   

Abstract

Background The amount of direct hand-tool-tissue interaction and feedback in minimally invasive surgery varies from being attenuated in laparoscopy to being completely absent in robotic minimally invasive surgery. The role of haptic feedback during surgical skill acquisition and its emphasis in training have been a constant source of controversy. This review discusses the major developments in haptic simulation as they relate to surgical performance and the current research questions that remain unanswered. Search Strategy An in-depth review of the literature was performed using PubMed. Results A total of 198 abstracts were returned based on our search criteria. Three major areas of research were identified, including advancements in 1 of the 4 components of haptic systems, evaluating the effectiveness of haptic integration in simulators, and improvements to haptic feedback in robotic surgery. Conclusions Force feedback is the best method for tissue identification in minimally invasive surgery and haptic feedback provides the greatest benefit to surgical novices in the early stages of their training. New technology has improved our ability to capture, playback and enhance to utility of haptic cues in simulated surgery. Future research should focus on deciphering how haptic training in surgical education can increase performance, safety, and improve training efficiency.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Keywords:  haptic feedback; minimally invasive surgery; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26839212     DOI: 10.1177/1553350616628680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy and inter-operator variability of small bowel length measurement at laparoscopy.

Authors:  Benny Gazer; Danny Rosin; Barak Bar-Zakai; Udi Willenz; Ofer Doron; Mordechai Gutman; Avinoam Nevler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Thymic tumours: a single center surgical experience and literature review on the current diagnosis and management of thymic malignancies.

Authors:  Fabrizio Minervini; Laura Boschetti; Michael Gregor; Mariano Provencio; Virginia Calvo; Peter B Kestenholz; Savvas Lampridis; Davide Patrini; Pietro Bertoglio; L Filipe Azenha; Consolato M Sergi; Gregor J Kocher
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-11

3.  How to examine anastomotic integrity intraoperatively in totally laparoscopic radical gastrectomy? Methylene blue testing prevents technical defect-related anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  Chun Deng; Yang Liu; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Heng-Duo Qi; Zhi Guo; Xu Zhao; Xiao-Jun Li
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Force application of laparoscopic surgeons under the impact of heavy personal protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yao Zhang; Shuyi Kiana Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Laparosc Endosc Robot Surg       Date:  2022-05-12

5.  Impact of haptic feedback on applied intracorporeal forces using a novel surgical robotic system-a randomized cross-over study with novices in an experimental setup.

Authors:  Johanna Miller; Manuel Braun; Johannes Bilz; Sebastian Matich; Carsten Neupert; Wolfgang Kunert; Andreas Kirschniak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Bio-Inspired Haptic Feedback for Artificial Palpation in Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Qiangqiang Ouyang; Juan Wu; Songping Sun; Jake Pensa; Ahmad Abiri; Erik Dutson; James Bisley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.756

7.  The effects of laparoscopic graspers with enhanced haptic feedback on applied forces: a randomized comparison with conventional graspers.

Authors:  Chantal C J Alleblas; Michel P H Vleugels; Sjors F P J Coppus; Theodoor E Nieboer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Low-cost three-dimensional printed phantom for neuraxial anesthesia training: Development and comparison to a commercial model.

Authors:  Azad Mashari; Mario Montealegre-Gallegos; Jelliffe Jeganathan; Lu Yeh; Joshua Qua Hiansen; Massimiliano Meineri; Feroze Mahmood; Robina Matyal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Surgical Simulator.

Authors:  Ben Sainsbury; Maciej Łącki; Mohammed Shahait; Mitchell Goldenberg; Amir Baghdadi; Lora Cavuoto; Jing Ren; Mark Green; Jason Lee; Timothy D Averch; Carlos Rossa
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-01-14

10.  Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  E Willuth; S F Hardon; F Lang; C M Haney; E A Felinska; K F Kowalewski; B P Müller-Stich; T Horeman; F Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.