Literature DB >> 22011261

Operative experience of urological trainees in the UK.

Jonathan D Gill1, Lianne F Stewart, Nicholas J R George, Ian Eardley.   

Abstract

What's known on the subject? And what does the study add? One of the main components of surgical training is the development of operative skills which, in part, is related to the extent of the practical operative experience. The operative experience of urological trainees in the UK has not being previously published. We examine trainees' current operative experience and analyse the changes over recent years. With a notable decrease in experience of certain procedures, we highlight the possible reasons and discuss the implications for future training. We have examined the operative experience of urological trainees in the UK over a 6-year period. Between 2004 and 2009, urological trainees submitting their operative logbooks to the Specialist Advisory Committee for the award of Certificate of Completion of Training were analysed. We recorded trainees' experience in eight operative procedures; transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP, including bipolar TURP), transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT), radical nephrectomy (RN, open and laparoscopic), radical cystectomy (RC), radical prostatectomy (RP), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureteroscopy (flexible and rigid). In all, 251 logbooks were identified over the 6-year period. In 2008/2009, the mean (range) number of cases 'performed' and 'supervised' were as follows; TURP 189 (41-516), TURBT 190 (50-432), open RN 21 (2-78), RC 10 (0-70), RP 13 (0-80), PCNL 19 (0-125), ureteroscopy 131 (14-465), laparoscopic RN 11 (0-97). Latterly there has been a significant reduction in the numbers of TURP, open RNs and RCs. There has been an increase in the use of trainees as assistants for RC, RP and open RN. There was a large variation in numbers of procedures performed between trainees. In summary there has been a recent decline in the numbers of TURP, open RNs and RCs performed. For all procedures, significant variability exists between trainees.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22011261     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10579.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Urology training in Germany: international comparison of educational concepts and satisfaction].

Authors:  A Cebulla; C Bolenz; D M Carrion; L Bellut
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Prostate surgery within residency programs in urology].

Authors:  J Bründl; F Zengerling; H Borgmann; I Syring
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Incorporation of the fluoroless C-Arm Trainer at the American Urological Association hands on training percutaneous renal access.

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; David M Hoenig; Philip Zhao; Sammy E Elsamra; Joshua Stern; Geoffrey Gaunay; Piruz Motamedinia; Zeph Okeke; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Robert M Sweet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Impact of surgeon's experience on outcome parameters following ureterorenoscopic stone removal.

Authors:  I Wolff; S Lebentrau; A Miernik; T Ecke; C Gilfrich; B Hoschke; M Schostak; M May
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Exposure of Urology Residents to the Management of Urethral Strictures in Saudi Arabia: Should the Program for Postgraduates Be Customized?

Authors:  Raed Almannie; Abdullah Alturki; Abdullah AlSufyani; Waleed Alkhamis; Saleh Binsaleh; Fahad Alyami
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 6.  A Comparison of Urology Training Across Five Major English-Speaking Countries.

Authors:  Rishi Naik; Indrajeet Mandal; Alexander Hampson; Rowan Casey; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-03-20

Review 7.  Training the resident in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  M Hammad Ather; Chi-Fai Ng; Gholamraza Pourmand; Palle J Osther
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-09-16

8.  Stepwise case selection using Guy's stone score reduces complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy training.

Authors:  Jiten Jaipuria; Manav Suryavanshi; Amitsinh P Desai; Sanjay Goyal; Kaushal Patel; Sandip S Parhad; Santosh K Subudhi; Chandrashekar V Rao; Satish P Kumar; Tridib K Sen
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

9.  Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Surgical Simulator.

Authors:  Ben Sainsbury; Maciej Łącki; Mohammed Shahait; Mitchell Goldenberg; Amir Baghdadi; Lora Cavuoto; Jing Ren; Mark Green; Jason Lee; Timothy D Averch; Carlos Rossa
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-01-14

Review 10.  How to Implement a Simulation-Based Education Programme: Lessons from the UK Urology Simulation Boot Camp.

Authors:  Helen Please; Chandra Shekhar Biyani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 0.437

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.