Literature DB >> 19477580

Augmented reality: a new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Preliminary in vitro and in vivo results.

Dogu Teber1, Selcuk Guven, Tobias Simpfendörfer, Mathias Baumhauer, Esref Oguz Güven, Faruk Yencilek, Ali Serdar Gözen, Jens Rassweiler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of an augmented reality (AR)-based soft tissue navigation system in urologic laparoscopic surgery is an evolving technique.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a novel soft tissue navigation system developed to enhance the surgeon's perception and to provide decision-making guidance directly before initiation of kidney resection for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Custom-designed navigation aids, a mobile C-arm capable of cone-beam imaging, and a standard personal computer were used. The feasibility and reproducibility of inside-out tracking principles were evaluated in a porcine model with an artificially created intraparenchymal tumor in vitro. The same algorithm was then incorporated into clinical practice during LPN.
INTERVENTIONS: Evaluation of a fully automated inside-out tracking system was repeated in exactly the same way for 10 different porcine renal units. Additionally, 10 patients underwent retroperitoneal LPNs under manual AR guidance by one surgeon. MEASUREMENTS: The navigation errors and image-acquisition times were determined in vitro. The mean operative time, time to locate the tumor, and positive surgical margin were assessed in vivo. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The system was able to navigate and superpose the virtually created images and real-time images with an error margin of only 0.5 mm, and fully automated initial image acquisition took 40 ms. The mean operative time was 165 min (range: 135-195 min), and mean time to locate the tumor was 20 min (range: 13-27 min). None of the cases required conversion to open surgery. Definitive histology revealed tumor-free margins in all 10 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This novel AR tracking system proved to be functional with a reasonable margin of error and image-to-image registration time. Mounting the pre- or intraoperative imaging properties on real-time videoendoscopic images in a real-time manner will simplify and increase the precision of laparoscopic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477580     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  41 in total

1.  High-definition resolution three-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: randomized comparative study with high-definition resolution two-dimensional systems.

Authors:  Hidefumi Kinoshita; Ken Nakagawa; Yukio Usui; Masatsugu Iwamura; Akihiro Ito; Akira Miyajima; Akio Hoshi; Yoichi Arai; Shiro Baba; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Intraoperative augmented reality visualization. Current state of development and initial experiences with the CamC].

Authors:  S Weidert; L Wang; A von der Heide; N Navab; E Euler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  New trends in minimally invasive urological surgery: what is beyond the robot?

Authors:  Salvatore Micali; Giovannalberto Pini; Dogu Teber; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Stefano De Stefani; Giampaolo Bianchi; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Clinical application of a surgical navigation system based on virtual laparoscopy in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuichiro Hayashi; Kazunari Misawa; Masahiro Oda; David J Hawkes; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Endoscopic scene labelling and augmentation using intraoperative pulsatile motion and colour appearance cues with preoperative anatomical priors.

Authors:  Masoud S Nosrati; Alborz Amir-Khalili; Jean-Marc Peyrat; Julien Abinahed; Osama Al-Alao; Abdulla Al-Ansari; Rafeef Abugharbieh; Ghassan Hamarneh
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Learning kinematic mappings in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; Carla M Pugh; James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

7.  Real-time image guidance in laparoscopic liver surgery: first clinical experience with a guidance system based on intraoperative CT imaging.

Authors:  Hannes G Kenngott; Martin Wagner; Matthias Gondan; Felix Nickel; Marco Nolden; Andreas Fetzer; Jürgen Weitz; Lars Fischer; Stefanie Speidel; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Dittmar Böckler; Markus W Büchler; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  [Navigation in urological surgery: Possibilities and limits of current techniques].

Authors:  T Simpfendörfer; G Hatiboglu; B A Hadaschik; E Wild; L Maier-Hein; M-C Rassweiler; J Rassweiler; M Hohenfellner; D Teber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Laparascopic nephrectomy: different techniques and approaches.

Authors:  Tania González León
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Construction of a three-dimensional model of renal stones: comprehensive planning for percutaneous nephrolithotomy and assistance in surgery.

Authors:  Hulin Li; Yuanbo Chen; Chunxiao Liu; Bingkun Li; Kai Xu; Susu Bao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.