Lene Aasdahl1,2, Tom Ivar Lund Nilsen3,4, Ingebrigt Meisingset3, Anne Lovise Nordstoga3, Kari Anne I Evensen3,5,6,7, Julie Paulsen8, Paul Jarle Mork3, Eivind Schjelderup Skarpsno3,9. 1. Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Postboks 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. lene.aasdahl@ntnu.no. 2. Unicare Helsefort Rehabilitation Centre, Rissa, Norway. lene.aasdahl@ntnu.no. 3. Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Postboks 8905, MTFS, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. 4. Clinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 5. Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. 6. Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. 7. Unit for Physiotherapy Services, Trondheim, Norway. 8. Department of Medical Genetics, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 9. Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research shows that part of the variation in physical activity and sedentary behaviour may be explained by genetic factors. Identifying genetic variants associated with physical activity and sedentary behaviour can improve causal inference in physical activity research. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an updated overview of the evidence of genetic variants associated with physical activity or sedentary behaviour. METHODS: We performed systematic literature searches in PubMed and Embase for studies published from 1990 to April 2020 using keywords relating to "physical activity", "exercise", "sedentariness" and "genetics". Physical activity phenotypes were either based on self-report (e.g., questionnaires, diaries) or objective measures (e.g., accelerometry, pedometer). We considered original studies aiming to i) identify new genetic variants associated with physical activity or sedentary behaviour (i.e., genome wide association studies [GWAS]), or ii) assess the association between known genetic variants and physical activity or sedentary behaviour (i.e., candidate gene studies). Study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal were carried out by independent researchers, and risk of bias and methodological quality was assessed for all included studies. RESULTS: Fifty-four out of 5420 identified records met the inclusion criteria. Six of the included studies were GWAS, whereas 48 used a candidate gene approach. Only one GWAS and three candidate gene studies were considered high-quality. The six GWAS discovered up to 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with physical activity or sedentariness that reached genome-wide significance. In total, the candidate gene studies reported 30 different genes that were associated (p < 0.05) with physical activity or sedentary behaviour. SNPs in or close to nine candidate genes were associated with physical activity or sedentary behaviour in more than one study. CONCLUSION: GWAS have reported up to 10 loci associated with physical activity or sedentary behaviour. Candidate gene studies have pointed to some interesting genetic variants, but few have been replicated. Our review highlights the need for high-quality GWAS in large population-based samples, and with objectively assessed phenotypes, in order to establish robust genetic instruments for physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Furthermore, consistent replications in GWAS are needed to improve credibility of genetic variants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42019119456 .
BACKGROUND: Research shows that part of the variation in physical activity and sedentary behaviour may be explained by genetic factors. Identifying genetic variants associated with physical activity and sedentary behaviour can improve causal inference in physical activity research. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an updated overview of the evidence of genetic variants associated with physical activity or sedentary behaviour. METHODS: We performed systematic literature searches in PubMed and Embase for studies published from 1990 to April 2020 using keywords relating to "physical activity", "exercise", "sedentariness" and "genetics". Physical activity phenotypes were either based on self-report (e.g., questionnaires, diaries) or objective measures (e.g., accelerometry, pedometer). We considered original studies aiming to i) identify new genetic variants associated with physical activity or sedentary behaviour (i.e., genome wide association studies [GWAS]), or ii) assess the association between known genetic variants and physical activity or sedentary behaviour (i.e., candidate gene studies). Study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal were carried out by independent researchers, and risk of bias and methodological quality was assessed for all included studies. RESULTS: Fifty-four out of 5420 identified records met the inclusion criteria. Six of the included studies were GWAS, whereas 48 used a candidate gene approach. Only one GWAS and three candidate gene studies were considered high-quality. The six GWAS discovered up to 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with physical activity or sedentariness that reached genome-wide significance. In total, the candidate gene studies reported 30 different genes that were associated (p < 0.05) with physical activity or sedentary behaviour. SNPs in or close to nine candidate genes were associated with physical activity or sedentary behaviour in more than one study. CONCLUSION: GWAS have reported up to 10 loci associated with physical activity or sedentary behaviour. Candidate gene studies have pointed to some interesting genetic variants, but few have been replicated. Our review highlights the need for high-quality GWAS in large population-based samples, and with objectively assessed phenotypes, in order to establish robust genetic instruments for physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Furthermore, consistent replications in GWAS are needed to improve credibility of genetic variants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42019119456 .
Authors: Hannah Arem; Steven C Moore; Alpa Patel; Patricia Hartge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Kala Visvanathan; Peter T Campbell; Michal Freedman; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hans Olov Adami; Martha S Linet; I-Min Lee; Charles E Matthews Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: J Timothy Lightfoot; Eco J C DE Geus; Frank W Booth; Molly S Bray; Marcel DEN Hoed; Jaakko Kaprio; Scott A Kelly; Daniel Pomp; Michael C Saul; Martine A Thomis; Theodore Garland; Claude Bouchard Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: William E Kraus; Kenneth E Powell; William L Haskell; Kathleen F Janz; Wayne W Campbell; John M Jakicic; Richard P Troiano; Kyle Sprow; Andrea Torres; Katrina L Piercy Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Tessa Strain; Søren Brage; Stephen J Sharp; Justin Richards; Marko Tainio; Ding Ding; Jacques Benichou; Paul Kelly Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Valerie J Silfee; Christina F Haughton; Danielle E Jake-Schoffman; Andrea Lopez-Cepero; Christine N May; Meera Sreedhara; Milagros C Rosal; Stephenie C Lemon Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2018-05-10
Authors: Steven C Moore; I-Min Lee; Elisabete Weiderpass; Peter T Campbell; Joshua N Sampson; Cari M Kitahara; Sarah K Keadle; Hannah Arem; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Patricia Hartge; Hans-Olov Adami; Cindy K Blair; Kristin B Borch; Eric Boyd; David P Check; Agnès Fournier; Neal D Freedman; Marc Gunter; Mattias Johannson; Kay-Tee Khaw; Martha S Linet; Nicola Orsini; Yikyung Park; Elio Riboli; Kim Robien; Catherine Schairer; Howard Sesso; Michael Spriggs; Roy Van Dusen; Alicja Wolk; Charles E Matthews; Alpa V Patel Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: K E Roberts; P R Beckenkamp; M L Ferreira; G E Duncan; L Calais-Ferreira; J M Gatt; P Ferreira Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2022-10-08 Impact factor: 2.721
Authors: Elina Sillanpää; Aino Heikkinen; Anna Kankaanpää; Aini Paavilainen; Urho M Kujala; Tuija H Tammelin; Vuokko Kovanen; Sarianna Sipilä; Kirsi H Pietiläinen; Jaakko Kaprio; Miina Ollikainen; Eija K Laakkonen Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 6.551