Hannah Arem1, Steven C Moore1, Alpa Patel2, Patricia Hartge1, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez1, Kala Visvanathan3, Peter T Campbell2, Michal Freedman1, Elisabete Weiderpass4, Hans Olov Adami5, Martha S Linet1, I-Min Lee6, Charles E Matthews1. 1. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 2. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden5Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø6Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo7Department of Genetic Epidemiolog. 5. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden8Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans recommended a minimum of 75 vigorous-intensity or 150 moderate-intensity minutes per week (7.5 metabolic-equivalent hours per week) of aerobic activity for substantial health benefit and suggested additional benefits by doing more than double this amount. However, the upper limit of longevity benefit or possible harm with more physical activity is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the dose-response association between leisure time physical activity and mortality and define the upper limit of benefit or harm associated with increased levels of physical activity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We pooled data from 6 studies in the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium (baseline 1992-2003). Population-based prospective cohorts in the United States and Europe with self-reported physical activity were analyzed in 2014. A total of 661,137 men and women (median age, 62 years; range, 21-98 years) and 116,686 deaths were included. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with cohort stratification to generate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Median follow-up time was 14.2 years. EXPOSURES: Leisure time moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The upper limit of mortality benefit from high levels of leisure time physical activity. RESULTS: Compared with individuals reporting no leisure time physical activity, we observed a 20% lower mortality risk among those performing less than the recommended minimum of 7.5 metabolic-equivalent hours per week (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.78-0.82]), a 31% lower risk at 1 to 2 times the recommended minimum (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67-0.70]), and a 37% lower risk at 2 to 3 times the minimum (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.62-0.65]). An upper threshold for mortality benefit occurred at 3 to 5 times the physical activity recommendation (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.59-0.62]); however, compared with the recommended minimum, the additional benefit was modest (31% vs 39%). There was no evidence of harm at 10 or more times the recommended minimum (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.78]). A similar dose-response relationship was observed for mortality due to cardiovascular disease and to cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Meeting the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans minimum by either moderate- or vigorous-intensity activities was associated with nearly the maximum longevity benefit. We observed a benefit threshold at approximately 3 to 5 times the recommended leisure time physical activity minimum and no excess risk at 10 or more times the minimum. In regard to mortality, health care professionals should encourage inactive adults to perform leisure time physical activity and do not need to discourage adults who already participate in high-activity levels.
IMPORTANCE: The 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans recommended a minimum of 75 vigorous-intensity or 150 moderate-intensity minutes per week (7.5 metabolic-equivalent hours per week) of aerobic activity for substantial health benefit and suggested additional benefits by doing more than double this amount. However, the upper limit of longevity benefit or possible harm with more physical activity is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the dose-response association between leisure time physical activity and mortality and define the upper limit of benefit or harm associated with increased levels of physical activity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We pooled data from 6 studies in the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium (baseline 1992-2003). Population-based prospective cohorts in the United States and Europe with self-reported physical activity were analyzed in 2014. A total of 661,137 men and women (median age, 62 years; range, 21-98 years) and 116,686 deaths were included. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with cohort stratification to generate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Median follow-up time was 14.2 years. EXPOSURES: Leisure time moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The upper limit of mortality benefit from high levels of leisure time physical activity. RESULTS: Compared with individuals reporting no leisure time physical activity, we observed a 20% lower mortality risk among those performing less than the recommended minimum of 7.5 metabolic-equivalent hours per week (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.78-0.82]), a 31% lower risk at 1 to 2 times the recommended minimum (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67-0.70]), and a 37% lower risk at 2 to 3 times the minimum (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.62-0.65]). An upper threshold for mortality benefit occurred at 3 to 5 times the physical activity recommendation (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.59-0.62]); however, compared with the recommended minimum, the additional benefit was modest (31% vs 39%). There was no evidence of harm at 10 or more times the recommended minimum (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.78]). A similar dose-response relationship was observed for mortality due to cardiovascular disease and to cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Meeting the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans minimum by either moderate- or vigorous-intensity activities was associated with nearly the maximum longevity benefit. We observed a benefit threshold at approximately 3 to 5 times the recommended leisure time physical activity minimum and no excess risk at 10 or more times the minimum. In regard to mortality, health care professionals should encourage inactive adults to perform leisure time physical activity and do not need to discourage adults who already participate in high-activity levels.
Authors: I-Min Lee; Nancy R Cook; J Michael Gaziano; David Gordon; Paul M Ridker; Joann E Manson; Charles H Hennekens; Julie E Buring Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-07-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeanine M Genkinger; Elizabeth A Platz; Sandra C Hoffman; George W Comstock; Kathy J Helzlsouer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: J E Manson; F B Hu; J W Rich-Edwards; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-08-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Annemarie Koster; Tamara B Harris; Steven C Moore; Arthur Schatzkin; Albert R Hollenbeck; Jacques Th M van Eijk; Michael F Leitzmann Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: A M Wolf; D J Hunter; G A Colditz; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; K A Corsano; B Rosner; A Kriska; W C Willett Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Ange Wang; FeiFei Qin; Haley Hedlin; Manisha Desai; Rowan Chlebowski; Scarlett Gomez; Charles B Eaton; Karen C Johnson; Lihong Qi; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Catherine Womack; Heather A Wakelee; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Erin J Howden; Satyam Sarma; Justin S Lawley; Mildred Opondo; William Cornwell; Douglas Stoller; Marcus A Urey; Beverley Adams-Huet; Benjamin D Levine Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Xiaosheng He; Kana Wu; Shuji Ogino; Edward L Giovannucci; Andrew T Chan; Mingyang Song Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Anna K Porter; Samantha Schilsky; Kelly R Evenson; Roberta Florido; Priya Palta; Katelyn M Holliday; Aaron R Folsom Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2019-08-01
Authors: Eric J Roseen; Michael P LaValley; Shanshan Li; Robert B Saper; David T Felson; Lisa Fredman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 5.128