| Literature DB >> 34001218 |
Elina Sillanpää1,2, Aino Heikkinen3,4, Anna Kankaanpää5, Aini Paavilainen5, Urho M Kujala6, Tuija H Tammelin7, Vuokko Kovanen5, Sarianna Sipilä5, Kirsi H Pietiläinen8,9, Jaakko Kaprio3, Miina Ollikainen3,4, Eija K Laakkonen5.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the correspondence of different biological ageing estimates (i.e. epigenetic age) in blood and muscle tissue and their associations with physical activity (PA), physical function and body composition. Two independent cohorts (N = 139 and N = 47) were included, whose age span covered adulthood (23-69 years). Whole blood and m. vastus lateralis samples were collected, and DNA methylation was analysed. Four different DNA methylation age (DNAmAge) estimates were calculated using genome-wide methylation data and publicly available online tools. A novel muscle-specific methylation age was estimated using the R-package 'MEAT'. PA was measured with questionnaires and accelerometers. Several tests were conducted to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength. Body composition was estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. DNAmAge estimates from blood and muscle were highly correlated with chronological age, but different age acceleration estimates were weakly associated with each other. The monozygotic twin within-pair similarity of ageing pace was higher in blood (r = 0.617-0.824) than in muscle (r = 0.523-0.585). Associations of age acceleration estimates with PA, physical function and body composition were weak in both tissues and mostly explained by smoking and sex. The muscle-specific epigenetic clock MEAT was developed to predict chronological age, which may explain why it did not associate with functional phenotypes. The Horvath's clock and GrimAge were weakly associated with PA and related phenotypes, suggesting that higher PA would be linked to accelerated biological ageing in muscle. This may, however, be more reflective of the low capacity of epigenetic clock algorithms to measure functional muscle ageing than of actual age acceleration. Based on our results, the investigated epigenetic clocks have rather low value in estimating muscle ageing with respect to the physiological adaptations that typically occur due to ageing or PA. Thus, further development of methods is needed to gain insight into muscle tissue-specific ageing and the underlying biological pathways.Entities:
Keywords: Biological ageing; DNA methylation; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Maximal oxygen consumption; Muscle mass; Muscle strength; Twin study
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34001218 PMCID: PMC8127311 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01094-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Descriptive characteristics of the participant groups
| Young adults | Middle-aged | Older adults | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FTC, | ERMA, | FTC, | |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
| Age, year | 32.9 (5.3) | 51.8 (2.0) | 63.7 (4.2) |
| Age, range | 23–42 | 48–55 | 57–69 |
| Sex, male/female, | 62/47 | –/47 | 18/28 |
| Education, | |||
| Primary | 1 (1.0) | 2 (4.3) | 9 (20.5) |
| Secondary | 52 (51.5) | 26 (55.3) | 26 (59.1) |
| Tertiary | 48 (47.5) | 19 (40.4) | 9 (20.5) |
| Smoking, | |||
| Never | 43 (46.2) | 31 (66.0) | 26 (56.5) |
| Former | 27 (29.1) | 13 (27.7) | 14 (30.4) |
| Current | 23 (24.7) | 3 (6.4) | 6 (13.0) |
| Alcohol, drinks per week¤ | 4.4 (7.4) | 4.2 (4.5) | 3.1 (5.5) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 28.7 (5.8) | 26.0 (3.6) | 28.9 (5.7) |
| Fat mass, kg | 30.4 (13.7) | 26.0 (8.2) | 30.9 (9.9) |
| Lean body mass, kg | 51.4 (10.8) | 42.6 (4.5) | 46.1 (9.1) |
| Percentage of fat, % | 34.9 (10.1) | 35.8 (7.0) | 38.5 (8.1) |
| Sport index | 2.8 (0.99) | 2.1 (1.1) | |
| Leisure index | 2.9 (0.60) | 2.7 (0.80) | |
| Work index | 2.8 (0.82) | 3.0 (0.51) | |
| Self-reported physical activity, | |||
| Low | 6 (12.8) | ||
| Medium | 13 (27.7) | ||
| High | 28 (59.6) | ||
| Monitored physical activity | |||
| MVPA, min | 56.1 (32.2) | ||
| Step counts per day | 9 337 (3 378) | ||
| VO2max, ml/kg/min* | 35.2 (8.5) | ||
| Maximal workload, W | 195.8 (54.7) | ||
| Walking test, 6 min distance (m) | 670 (65) | ||
| Hand grip strength (N) | 331 (56) | ||
| Knee extension torque (Nm) | 486 (95) | ||
| Vertical jumping height (m) | 0.19 (0.043) |
+missing data in education variable N = 10, ¤one drink = 12 g/100% alcohol; #Body composition is estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; *N = 60; MVPA moderate to vigorous physical activity, VOmax maximal oxygen uptake
Fig. 1Scatter plots, regression lines (dotted lines), reference lines (solid lines) and Pearson’s correlation coefficients for each of the four predicted DNA methylation ages (DNAmAge) and chronological age in blood. Each dot represents one participant. Black dots denote participants from the FTC cohort and blue dots participants from the ERMA cohort
Fig. 2Scatter plots, regression lines (dotted lines), reference lines (solid lines) and Pearson’s correlation coefficients for each of the three predicted DNA methylation ages (DNAmAge) and chronological age in muscle. Each dot represents one participant. Black dots denote participants from the FTC cohort and blue dots participants from the ERMA cohort
Correlation coefficients between chronological age and different DNAmAge estimates in total body (blood) and muscle tissue
DNAmAge DNA methylation age in years, MEAT muscle epigenetic age test
Correlation coefficients between different DNAmAge acceleration estimates in blood and muscle tissue
DNAmAge DNA methylation age, MEAT muscle epigenetic age test
Associations between DNAmAge age acceleration estimates and physical activity in muscle
| Muscle DNAmAge acceleration | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horvath | GrimAge | MEAT | ||||||||
| MVPA | ||||||||||
| Low (ref) | Model 1 | 0.045 | 0.022 | 0.002 | ||||||
| Medium | 0.456 (0.661) | 0.492 | 0.152 (0.273) | 0.578 | 0.120 (0.631) | 0.849 | ||||
| High | 0.531 (0.272) | 0.053 | 0.338 (0.630) | 0.592 | ||||||
| Low (ref) | Model 2 | 0.111 | 0.038 | 0.005 | ||||||
| Medium | − 0.040 (0.667) | 0.951 | 0.059 (0.299) | 0.843 | 0.156 (0.683) | 0.820 | ||||
| High | 0.493 (0.268) | 0.068 | 0.336 (0.682) | 0.637 | ||||||
| Leisure index | Model 1 | 0.584 (0.516) | 0.259 | 0.010 | 0.008 (0.189) | 0.967 | 0.000 | − 0.763 (0.472) | 0.109 | 0.018 |
| Model 2 | 0.483 (0.538) | 0.372 | 0.109 | − 0.019 (0.190) | 0.922 | 0.025 | − 0.740 (0.523) | 0.161 | 0.020 | |
| Sport index | Model 1 | 0.050 | 0.068 (0.123) | 0.592 | 0.002 | − 0.221 (0.319) | 0.491 | 0.004 | ||
| Model 2 | 0.756 (0.440) | 0.091 | 0.136 | 0.042 (0.127) | 0.740 | 0.026 | − 0.216 (0.377) | 0.569 | 0.006 | |
| MVPA, min | Model 1 | 0.030 (0.017) | 0.079 | 0.067 | 0.129 | 0.023 (0.016) | 0.163 | 0.043 | ||
| Model 3 | 0.032 (0.018) | 0.075 | 0.080 | 0.161 | 0.021 (0.017) | 0.226 | 0.049 | |||
| Step counts per day | Model 1 | 0.003 (0.002) | 0.114 | 0.055 | 0.153 | 0.001 (0.002) | 0.548 | 0.008 | ||
| Model 3 | 0.003 (0.002) | 0.105 | 0.068 | 0.189 | 0.001 (0.002) | 0.758 | 0.028 | |||
| Low (ref) | Model 1 | 0.075 | 0.002 | 0.056 | ||||||
| Medium | 3.22 (1.82) | 0.084 | 0.296 (0.965) | 0.761 | 2.82 (1.79) | 0.122 | ||||
| High | 2.92 (1.66) | 0.085 | 0.200 (0.880) | 0.821 | 1.58 (1.63) | 0.338 | ||||
| Low (ref) | Model 2 | 0.082 | 0.035 | 0.079 | ||||||
| Medium | 3.21 (1.87) | 0.093 | 0.209 (0.978) | 0.832 | 2.70 (1.82) | 0.144 | ||||
| High | 2.96 (1.72) | 0.094 | 0.101 (0.903) | 0.912 | 1.34 (1.68) | 0.428 | ||||
Model 1. Linear regression analysis with one predictor. Model 2. As Model one, but adjusted for family relatedness, sex and smoking. Model 3. As model one, but adjusted for smoking. Step counts per day calculated per 100 counts. MEAT, muscle epigenetic age test. FTC, Finnish twin cohort; ERMA, Estrogenic Regulation of Muscle Apoptosis study. In first analysis, we formed tertiles based on the amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA, ERMA cohort) and sport indexes (FTC cohort) and pooled the data from these two cohorts
Associations between DNAmAge age acceleration estimates, body composition and physical function in muscle
| Muscle DNAmAge Acceleration | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horvath | GrimAge | MEAT | ||||||||
| Body mass index, | Model 1 | − 0.049 (0.050) | 0.323 | 0.005 | − 0.037 (0.020) | 0.072 | 0.018 | − 0.014 (0.047) | 0.759 | 0.001 |
| kg/m2 | Model 2 | − 0.047 (0.048) | 0.334 | 0.014 | − 0.036 (0.020) | 0.070 | 0.034 | − 0.011 (0.060) | 0.848 | 0.002 |
| Fat mass, kg | Model 1 | − | − | − 0.006 (0.022) | 0.780 | 0.000 | ||||
| Model 2 | − | − | − 0.007 (0.025) | 0.788 | 0.003 | |||||
| Lean body mass, kg | Model 1 | 0.012 (0.011) | 0.290 | 0.006 | − 0.004 (0.026) | 0.875 | 0.000 | |||
| Model 2 | 0.040 (0.052) | 0.437 | 0.073 | 0.002 (0.019) | 0.909 | 0.018 | − 0.018 (0.048) | 0.710 | 0.004 | |
| Fat percent, % | Model 1 | − | − | 0.008 (0.029) | 0.771 | 0.001 | ||||
| Model 2 | − | − | 0.011 (0.038) | 0.771 | 0.003 | |||||
| Maximal oxygen | Model 1 | 0.037 (0.020) | 0.074 | 0.054 | − 0.077 (0.044) | 0.082 | 0.051 | |||
| uptake, ml/kg/min | Model 2 | 0.034 (0.069) | 0.626 | 0.195 | 0.028 (0.032) | 0.393 | 0.075 | − 0.079 (0.042) | 0.067 | 0.071 |
| Walking test 6 min | Model 1 | 0.002 (0.009) | 0.811 | 0.001 | 0.007 (0.004) | 0.138 | 0.050 | − 0.005 (0.008) | 0.506 | 0.009 |
| M | Model 3 | 0.000 (0.009) | 0.959 | 0.010 | 0.006 (0.005) | 0.187 | 0.070 | − 0.004 (0.008) | 0.632 | 0.014 |
| Hand grip strength | Model 1 | 0.001 (0.100) | 0.904 | 0.000 | 0.000 (0.005) | 0.959 | 0.000 | − 0.012 (0.009) | 0.203 | 0.036 |
| Model 3 | 0.001 (0.010) | 0.913 | 0.009 | 0.000 (0.005) | 0.973 | 0.034 | − 0.012 (0.009) | 0.213 | 0.051 | |
| Knee extension | Model 1 | 0.010 (0.006) | 0.098 | 0.066 | 0.004 (0.003) | 0.170 | 0.044 | − 0.003 (0.005) | 0.508 | 0.007 |
| torque, Nm | Model 3 | 0.010 (0.006) | 0.115 | 0.074 | 0.004 (0.003) | 0.285 | 0.066 | − 0.004 (0.005) | 0.486 | 0.056 |
| Vertical jumping | Model 1 | 1.43 (12.95) | 0.915 | 0.000 | 6.246 (6.545) | 0.345 | 0.020 | − 11.9 (12.0) | 0.326 | 0.021 |
| height, cm | Model 3 | 0.679 (13.3) | 0.960 | 0.009 | 5.431 (6.664) | 0.420 | 0.048 | − 12.8 (12.3) | 0.302 | 0.040 |
Model 1. Linear regression analysis with one predictor. Model 2. As Model one, but adjusted for family relatedness, sex and smoking. Model 3 as model one, but adjusted for smoking. MEAT, muscle epigenetic age test. FTC, Finnish twin cohort; ERMA, Estrogenic Regulation of Muscle Apoptosis study