William E Kraus1, Kenneth E Powell2, William L Haskell3, Kathleen F Janz4, Wayne W Campbell5, John M Jakicic6, Richard P Troiano7, Kyle Sprow7, Andrea Torres8, Katrina L Piercy9. 1. Department and School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. 3. Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. 4. Department of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. 5. Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. 6. Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 7. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD. 8. ICF, Fairfax, VA. 9. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Conduct a systematic umbrella review to evaluate the relationship of physical activity (PA) with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD); to evaluate the shape of the dose-response relationships; and to evaluate these relationships relative to the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. METHODS: Primary search encompassing 2006 to March, 2018 for existing systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and pooled analyses reporting on these relationships. Graded the strength of evidence using a matrix developed for the Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. RESULTS: The association of self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) on all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, and atherosclerotic CVD-including incident coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke and heart failure-are very similar. Increasing MVPA to guidelines amounts in the inactive US population has the potential to have an important and substantial positive impact on these outcomes in the adult population. The following points are clear: the associations of PA with beneficial health outcomes begin when adopting very modest (one-third of guidelines) amounts; any MVPA is better than none; meeting the 2008 PA guidelines reduces mortality and CVD risk to about 75% of the maximal benefit obtained by physical activity alone; PA amounts beyond guidelines recommendations amount reduces risk even more, but greater amounts of PA are required to obtain smaller health benefits; and there is no evidence of excess risk over the maximal effect observed at about three to five times the amounts associated with current guidelines. When PA is quantified in terms of energy expenditure (MET·h·wk), these relationships hold for walking, running, and biking. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid the risks associated with premature mortality and the development of ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, and all-cause heart failure, all adults should strive to reach the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.
PURPOSE: Conduct a systematic umbrella review to evaluate the relationship of physical activity (PA) with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD); to evaluate the shape of the dose-response relationships; and to evaluate these relationships relative to the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. METHODS: Primary search encompassing 2006 to March, 2018 for existing systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and pooled analyses reporting on these relationships. Graded the strength of evidence using a matrix developed for the Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. RESULTS: The association of self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) on all-cause mortality, CVDmortality, and atherosclerotic CVD-including incident coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke and heart failure-are very similar. Increasing MVPA to guidelines amounts in the inactive US population has the potential to have an important and substantial positive impact on these outcomes in the adult population. The following points are clear: the associations of PA with beneficial health outcomes begin when adopting very modest (one-third of guidelines) amounts; any MVPA is better than none; meeting the 2008 PA guidelines reduces mortality and CVD risk to about 75% of the maximal benefit obtained by physical activity alone; PA amounts beyond guidelines recommendations amount reduces risk even more, but greater amounts of PA are required to obtain smaller health benefits; and there is no evidence of excess risk over the maximal effect observed at about three to five times the amounts associated with current guidelines. When PA is quantified in terms of energy expenditure (MET·h·wk), these relationships hold for walking, running, and biking. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid the risks associated with premature mortality and the development of ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, and all-cause heart failure, all adults should strive to reach the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.
Authors: Darren Er Warburton; Sarah Charlesworth; Adam Ivey; Lindsay Nettlefold; Shannon Sd Bredin Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Blair T Johnson; Hayley V MacDonald; Michael L Bruneau; Tashauna U Goldsby; Justin C Brown; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Linda S Pescatello Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: David M Buchner; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Chongzhi Di; Michael J LaMonte; Stephen W Marshall; Julie Hunt; Yuzheng Zhang; Dori E Rosenberg; I-Min Lee; Kelly R Evenson; Amy H Herring; Cora E Lewis; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-07-29 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Michael J LaMonte; Cora E Lewis; David M Buchner; Kelly R Evenson; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Chongzhi Di; I-Min Lee; John Bellettiere; Marcia L Stefanick; Charles B Eaton; Barbara V Howard; Chloe Bird; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Steven C Moore; Alpa V Patel; Charles E Matthews; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Yikyung Park; Hormuzd A Katki; Martha S Linet; Elisabete Weiderpass; Kala Visvanathan; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Michael Thun; Susan M Gapstur; Patricia Hartge; I-Min Lee Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: William E Kraus; Kathleen F Janz; Kenneth E Powell; Wayne W Campbell; John M Jakicic; Richard P Troiano; Kyle Sprow; Andrea Torres; Katrina L Piercy Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Melker S Johansson; Andreas Holtermann; Jacob L Marott; Eva Prescott; Peter Schnohr; Mette Korshøj; Karen Søgaard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John M Jakicic; Robert I Berkowitz; Paula Bolin; George A Bray; Jeanne M Clark; Mace Coday; Caitlin Egan; Mary Evans; John P Foreyt; Janet E Fulton; Frank L Greenway; Edward W Gregg; Helen P Hazuda; James O Hill; Edward S Horton; Van S Hubbard; Robert W Jeffery; Karen C Johnson; Ruby Johnson; Steven E Kahn; Anne Kure; Wei Lang; Cora E Lewis; David M Nathan; Jennifer Patricio; Anne Peters; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Henry Pownall; W Jack Rejeski; Monika Safford; Kerry J Stewart; Thomas A Wadden; Michael P Walkup; Rena R Wing; Holly Wyatt Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Susan K Malone; Freda Patterson; Laura Grunin; Gail D Melkus; Barbara Riegel; Naresh Punjabi; Gary Yu; Jacek Urbanek; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Allan Pack Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: N Aerts; D Le Goff; M Odorico; J Y Le Reste; P Van Bogaert; L Peremans; G Musinguzi; P Van Royen; H Bastiaens Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Hugo V Pereira; Pedro J Teixeira; Marta M Marques; Eliana V Carraça; Marlene N Silva; Jorge Encantado; Inês Santos; António L Palmeira Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: Tom Martinsson Ngouali; Mats Börjesson; Åsa Cider; Stefan Lundqvist Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 3.390