Literature DB >> 33478912

Clinician Variation in Ordering and Completion of Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening in a Safety-Net Medical System.

David E Gerber1, Heidi A Hamann2, Olivia Dorsey3, Chul Ahn4, Jessica L Phillips3, Noel O Santini5, Travis Browning6, Cristhiaan D Ochoa7, Joyce Adesina8, Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu8, Eric Steen5, Harris Majeed9, Amrit Gonugunta9, Simon J Craddock Lee4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Less than 5% of eligible individuals in the United States undergo lung cancer screening. Variation in clinicians' participation in lung cancer screening has not been determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied medical providers who ordered ≥ 1 low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening from February 2017 through February 2019 in an integrated safety-net healthcare system. We analyzed associations between provider characteristics and LDCT orders and completion using chi-square, Fisher exact, and Student t tests, as well as ANOVA and multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among an estimated 194 adult primary care physicians, 144 (74%) ordered at least 1 LDCT, as did 39 specialists. These 183 medical providers ordered 1594 LDCT (median, 4; interquartile range, 2-9). In univariate and multivariate models, family practice providers (P < .001) and providers aged ≥ 50 years (P = .03) ordered more LDCT than did other clinicians. Across providers, the median proportion of ordered LDCT that were completed was 67%. The total or preceding number of LDCT ordered by a clinician was not associated with the likelihood of LDCT completion.
CONCLUSION: In an integrated safety-net healthcare system, most adult primary care providers order LDCT. The number of LDCT ordered varies widely among clinicians, and a substantial proportion of ordered LDCT are not completed.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Primary care; Specialist; Underserved; Urban

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33478912      PMCID: PMC9208730          DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer        ISSN: 1525-7304            Impact factor:   4.840


  49 in total

1.  Racial differences in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  P B Bach; L D Cramer; J L Warren; C B Begg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Community-oriented primary care in action: a Dallas story.

Authors:  Sue Pickens; Paul Boumbulian; Ron J Anderson; Samuel Ross; Sharon Phillips
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  C Max Schmidt; Olivier Turrini; Purvi Parikh; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; Atilla Nakeeb; Thomas J Howard; Henry A Pitt; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-07

4.  Screening initiation with FIT or colonoscopy: Post-hoc analysis of a pragmatic, randomized trial.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Chul Ahn; Sandi L Pruitt; Amy E Hughes; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta; Noel O Santini; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Amit G Singal; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Examining screening mammography participation among women aged 40 to 74.

Authors:  Karena D Volesky; Paul J Villeneuve
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Physician Consolidation: Rapid Movement From Small To Large Group Practices, 2013-15.

Authors:  David B Muhlestein; Nathan J Smith
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Physicians' attitudes and behaviour toward screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.

Authors:  Patricia Smith; Susan Hum; Vered Kakzanov; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Ruth Heisey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Carlijn M van der Aalst; Pim A de Jong; Ernst T Scholten; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Carla Weenink; Uraujh Yousaf-Khan; Nanda Horeweg; Susan van 't Westeinde; Mathias Prokop; Willem P Mali; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Peter M A van Ooijen; Joachim G J V Aerts; Michael A den Bakker; Erik Thunnissen; Johny Verschakelen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Joan E Walter; Kevin Ten Haaf; Harry J M Groen; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Lung cancer diagnostic and treatment intervals in the United States: a health care disparity?

Authors:  Jeffrey T Yorio; Yang Xie; Jingsheng Yan; David E Gerber
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  The Effect of Primary Care Physician Knowledge of Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines on Perceptions and Utilization of Low-Dose Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Dan J Raz; Geena X Wu; Martin Consunji; Rebecca A Nelson; Heeyoung Kim; Can-Lan Sun; Virginia Sun; Jae Y Kim
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.785

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence And Impact of Medical Comorbidities in A Real-World Lung Cancer Screening Population.

Authors:  Harris Majeed; Hong Zhu; Sarah A Williams; Heidi A Hamann; Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu; Jessica Lee; Noel O Santini; Travis Browning; Tanushree Prasad; Joyce O Adesina; Minh Do; David Balis; Juana Gamarra de Willams; Ellen Kitchell; David H Johnson; Simon J Craddock Lee; David E Gerber
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.840

2.  Lung Cancer Screening by Race and Ethnicity in an Integrated Health System in Hawaii.

Authors:  Caryn E S Oshiro; Timothy B Frankland; Joanne Mor; Carmen P Wong; Yannica Theda Martinez; Cheryl K K Aruga; Stacey Honda
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-01-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.